|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:17 pm
It's been a wrestling match over the mechanics of the same opening exchange.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:40 pm
Man, just ********' restrain their arms with yours and start having a headbutting match of who can smash their head against the other person's harder.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:57 pm
I think they went to sleep...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:58 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:20 am
I think how the judging is based on a lot of technical stuff, arguements over technicalities will occur instead of trying to make fights flow and entertain. Because the entertaining aspect of a fight here doesn't seem to count in a decision.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:38 am
The entertainment aspect went out the fight the moment you tried to say counter clockwise is a right turn instead of a left. rofl
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:01 am
The judging is based on who kicked whose a**.
If no one landed a hit.. the most aggressive person will be decided the winner.. very simple.
I realize the whole "who hit who" or "who kicked whose a** the most" thing makes two people want to get into a mode where they never take hits. But I'd take a hit just to give my opponent two.. or three.. or for the chance to break their arm. Also because it's impossible to go through a fight without taking a hit unless your very first attack is a knockout one... and it lands.
If you guys are aggressive, and focus on pounding the opponent mercilessly. Dominating them. And etc. etc.
Then it will be entertaining to read no matter how you cut it.
I leave those words of wisdom with you two in hopes that you'll kick eachother's asses in the 2nd & 3rd rounds.
cause I have this 40k.. and there are no such things as draws here.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:01 am
It doesn't matter, one way or another, that punch could react to yours that had to reach all the way across the body against mine that was slanted back from the beginning.
Quit your bitching, ref made a call, now fight.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:32 am
Oh Im fighting... worry about *you*.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:39 pm
Heheh. I take fights just so the thing keeps moving along.
A counter maybe every few rounds, but thats it.
Cause nine posts to land a hit or anyone to actually FINISH a move is a bit ridiculous.
I'd rather lose, have fun, and take the blows than to argue with anyone. That and I don't have to worry about people like Wulf going "Well technically, you didn't say what you were doing with your left pinky toe, so..."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:45 pm
Silver Moonblade Heheh. I take fights just so the thing keeps moving along. A counter maybe every few rounds, but thats it. Cause nine posts to land a hit or anyone to actually FINISH a move is a bit ridiculous. I'd rather lose, have fun, and take the blows than to argue with anyone. That and I don't have to worry about people like Wulf going "Well technically, you didn't say what you were doing with your left pinky toe, so..." Do you lose when you have 20k and an attached association's respect on the line... just to have fun?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:07 pm
Kichiro Oda Do you lose when you have 20k and an attached association's respect on the line... just to have fun? Cant argue with that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:40 pm
Arguing the semantics of attacks doesn't count as aggressiveness.
Not even with IC "actions."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:52 pm
Online reputations are overrated. stare
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:54 pm
I am doing this fight because Crawley suggested it, and I respect his opinions because of his career as a Roleplay fighter and ability to knock me down in a fight.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|