|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:46 am
Terrible Article.
First off, you go onto say the Katana is useless if your not trained in it. Most things are useless if you don't know how to use them. Even guns. If I where to enter a shootout with a Police offer, I am going to lose. He has more training with it. Same with swords, clubs, pullarms, darts. Anything
Then you go onto say that a Katana is useless again heavy armour. I've some news, In Japan during that time period full plate didnt really exist. Compairing 6th centry swords to 13th centry out of region armour is pointless. My Kevlar makes short work of your Arquebus!
I've yet to meet anyone that claims a Katana or any sword can block bullets. Unless you count movies, and if you do. You have serious problems.
I am not to knowledgable on Japanese history, so please bare with me on this. The Katana was an honorable sword. Not because It was the end all and be all of weapons, but because the Society said it was. Much like the Bible. Christians believe its a Holy book therefor it is. To them.
On another note. I've always been partial to the Naginata.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:57 am
Threx Terrible Article. First off, you go onto say the Katana is useless if your not trained in it. Most things are useless if you don't know how to use them. Even guns. If I where to enter a shootout with a Police offer, I am going to lose. He has more training with it. Same with swords, clubs, pullarms, darts. Anything I think that was the point. Quote: Then you go onto say that a Katana is useless again heavy armour. I've some news, In Japan during that time period full plate didnt really exist. Compairing 6th centry swords to 13th centry out of region armour is pointless. My Kevlar makes short work of your Arquebus! Again, that is the point. The katana is not some uber sword that kills everyone in one dramatic bullshit slice. If it cant handle armor while another sword can, that sword is probably better than the katana. Quote: I've yet to meet anyone that claims a Katana or any sword can block bullets. Unless you count movies, and if you do. You have serious problems. Gaia is full of them. They are there, trust me. Quote: I am not to knowledgable on Japanese history, so please bare with me on this. The Katana was an honorable sword. Not because It was the end all and be all of weapons, but because the Society said it was. Much like the Bible. Christians believe its a Holy book therefor it is. To them. When Vince reads this he is going to type some 100 page essay on honor for you. Seriously, its a sword. Honor means s**t to something that is inanimate and kills people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:17 am
Fenrir Fenix Seriously, its a sword. Honor means s**t to something that is inanimate and kills people. guns/swords dont kill people, people do
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:19 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:47 am
Threx Terrible Article. First off, you go onto say the Katana is useless if your not trained in it. Most things are useless if you don't know how to use them. Even guns. If I where to enter a shootout with a Police offer, I am going to lose. He has more training with it. Same with swords, clubs, pullarms, darts. Anything That IS the point - the katana was POOR military weapon and a SHITTY modern day one because of the IMMENSE amount of training required to use one effecively, due to its innate lack of mass and the desgin of the blade - if you did not have training with it; you were going to die. As opposed to the b*****d sword, whcih if you didnt have trianing - it was still a fairly simple weapon - you could pretty much just grab with both hands and hit them REALLY hard with the pointy end - no techniqe required to be effective there. Threx Then you go onto say that a Katana is useless again heavy armour. I've some news, In Japan during that time period full plate didnt really exist. Compairing 6th centry swords to 13th centry out of region armour is pointless. My Kevlar makes short work of your Arquebus! Buddy. The katana was used up until the EARLY 19TH CENTURY - when the introdcution of modern policy in the Meji era did away with the need or wont of a sword. So yeah - full plate was around while the katana was in use. Threx I've yet to meet anyone that claims a Katana or any sword can block bullets. Unless you count movies, and if you do. You have serious problems. You havent been to GD yes have you? Threx I am not to knowledgable on Japanese history, so please bare with me on this. The Katana was an honorable sword. Not because It was the end all and be all of weapons, but because the Society said it was. Much like the Bible. Christians believe its a Holy book therefor it is. To them. Honor? Repeat after me. HONOR. IN. COMBAT. IS. TOTALLY. POINTLESS. The samurai had a code of honor, the Bushido Shinjousu, I have a copy of it on my desk next to me THIS VERY SECOND. The code of Bushido was pretty much just a system that said the following Honor your family. Do well by those you meet. Be polite. Be vigilient. That was pretty much the gist of it. The common mistake about the katana being 'honorable' is the concept that the samurai considered it thier 'soul' - by that they meant how they used it reprisented the condition of thier character, its essentially if you draw your sword in defense of the weak - thats a good thing, thus 'honorable'. Whilst if you rape, pillage and plunder - bad thing 'dishonroable'. The reason this worked is because the ENTIRE BLOODY CULTURE subscribed to this system, so everyone followed these invisiable codes of conduct in battle and what not... But in modern soceity - SMART society, honor systems are pointless, even if it WERE the mainstream - the world is too big, too diverse for these to work, there woudl always be someone who fougth dirty, and who didnt play fair. So honro is comabt is stupid, if someone is trying to KILL ME I'm seriously not worried about figthing fair, I'll bit, kcik, scratch and beat his a** with blunt instriments in any manner i deem fit to SURVIVE. Honor in combat is silly, stupid, and will get you KILLED. A weapon, therefor cannot be honorable, as it is a TOOL, its not alive, it doesnt influence your being, its a BIG SHARP METAL STICK. Threx On another note. I've always been partial to the Naginata. Huzzah. I've always been partial to the FN-F2000. Practicality, yo.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:28 am
Bruce-Ganked-Lee FiaNari A modern knight can be Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger(yes they were both knighted) and a few others. Let's not forget Elton John and Ian McKellan. But then what the ******** is a modern samurai? Taliban? Modern Knights are t3h scary come to think of it. I mean who really wants to mess with Mick Jagger? If you start him up he never stops!! gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:59 am
FiaNari Bruce-Ganked-Lee FiaNari A modern knight can be Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger(yes they were both knighted) and a few others. Let's not forget Elton John and Ian McKellan. But then what the ******** is a modern samurai? Taliban? Modern Knights are t3h scary come to think of it. I mean who really wants to mess with Mick Jagger? If you start him up he never stops!! gonk Dont forget Sean Connery. Black belt or no - you just dont ******** with that s**t. He'll go all badass Scotsman on your a** with a golfclub.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:22 am
Vincent Darkholme FiaNari Bruce-Ganked-Lee FiaNari A modern knight can be Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger(yes they were both knighted) and a few others. Let's not forget Elton John and Ian McKellan. But then what the ******** is a modern samurai? Taliban? Modern Knights are t3h scary come to think of it. I mean who really wants to mess with Mick Jagger? If you start him up he never stops!! gonk Dont forget Sean Connery. Black belt or no - you just dont ******** with that s**t. He'll go all badass Scotsman on your a** with a golfclub. Or launch pen missles at you...him being James Bond and what not. Oh and don't you guys know? Sir Elton John is the leader of the gay mafia(so sayseth Will and Grace).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:40 am
Bruce-Ganked-Lee Vincent Darkholme FiaNari Bruce-Ganked-Lee FiaNari A modern knight can be Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger(yes they were both knighted) and a few others. Let's not forget Elton John and Ian McKellan. But then what the ******** is a modern samurai? Taliban? Modern Knights are t3h scary come to think of it. I mean who really wants to mess with Mick Jagger? If you start him up he never stops!! gonk Dont forget Sean Connery. Black belt or no - you just dont ******** with that s**t. He'll go all badass Scotsman on your a** with a golfclub. Or launch pen missles at you...him being James Bond and what not. Oh and don't you guys know? Sir Elton John is the leader of the gay mafia(so sayseth Will and Grace). I think this thread turned to ridicuousness a long time ago. Oh I think Spain still knights I think as well.(will research)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:00 pm
DarklingGlory Fenrir Fenix Seriously, its a sword. Honor means s**t to something that is inanimate and kills people. guns/swords dont kill people, people do Its weapon. Weapons are used to kill people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 5:02 am
I fear I may have been partially responsible in inspiring this, yet I shall attempt to repeat what I said in my PM. The katana is hardly an ultimate weapon, true, but it wasn't made to be either. Now, when was the katana most popular? Its popularity skyrocketed just around the time when they were entering the edo-period (tokugawa-era), due to less emphazising on warfare and more on individual accomplishment. This in turn was because of the strict feodalism that Ieyasu founded, one which ensured a manner of "peace" within the previously ever so infighting-eager country. The reason the katanas popularity went up in this period was most of all because it wasn't as much the kind of sword most people would prefer on the battlefield as it was a quickdraw-weapon. Why is this so useful? Simple - dueling, something that grew ever more common in these peaceful times. The katana was, already when it was made, designed for a warrior to be able to draw it with lightning speed. The quickdraw-duels in most western-movies are, after all, inspired by the iai-duels of samurai. The strength of the katana lies in the ability to utilize the saya, the curved blade and your own body in order to draw a sword of such length with speed rivalling that of a dagger. In combat the same principles remain, to a degree. The katana was made for speed, not heavy impact. Even in the edo-period, while many swords of greater length and the like were modified to be more like katana, many other weapons were popular. Though even harder to learn and handle than a katana, for some reason I've always been quite fond of the kusari-gama. J. Thorn A final note as well:Miyamoto Musashi, the finest swordsman in Japan was beaten by a man with a polearm. I shall take this opportunity to try and relate the whole story, as briefly as I can manage. First Musashi beat the man, fair and square, he defeated him. Then Musashi went off to fight others, while the man, more or less devastated by his defeat, modified his style and trained harder than ever. When they met next time he had developed an entirely new weapon, the jo, and a style which was essientially based around primarily beating Musashi's style and secondly being generally effective against the common, during the period steadily growing, kenjutsu. Finally, he did not beat Musashi. Both lived their lives following the duel claiming that they had lost, something I find it strange people so rarely interpret as a draw, and after the fight the man became Musashi's disciple. Now if he had been superior, why did he want to study under an inferior man? I am in no way insulting Jodo or its founder, but I find simple statements of Musashi's defeat somewhat annoying.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 1:16 pm
Tveir I fear I may have been partially responsible in inspiring this, yet I shall attempt to repeat what I said in my PM. The katana is hardly an ultimate weapon, true, but it wasn't made to be either. Now, when was the katana most popular? Its popularity skyrocketed just around the time when they were entering the edo-period (tokugawa-era), due to less emphazising on warfare and more on individual accomplishment. This in turn was because of the strict feodalism that Ieyasu founded, one which ensured a manner of "peace" within the previously ever so infighting-eager country. The reason the katanas popularity went up in this period was most of all because it wasn't as much the kind of sword most people would prefer on the battlefield as it was a quickdraw-weapon. Why is this so useful? Simple - dueling, something that grew ever more common in these peaceful times. The katana was, already when it was made, designed for a warrior to be able to draw it with lightning speed. The quickdraw-duels in most western-movies are, after all, inspired by the iai-duels of samurai. The strength of the katana lies in the ability to utilize the saya, the curved blade and your own body in order to draw a sword of such length with speed rivalling that of a dagger. In combat the same principles remain, to a degree. The katana was made for speed, not heavy impact. Even in the edo-period, while many swords of greater length and the like were modified to be more like katana, many other weapons were popular. Though even harder to learn and handle than a katana, for some reason I've always been quite fond of the kusari-gama. J. Thorn A final note as well:Miyamoto Musashi, the finest swordsman in Japan was beaten by a man with a polearm. I shall take this opportunity to try and relate the whole story, as briefly as I can manage. Quote: First Musashi beat the man, fair and square, he defeated him. Then Musashi went off to fight others, while the man, more or less devastated by his defeat, modified his style and trained harder than ever. When they met next time he had developed an entirely new weapon, the jo, and a style which was essientially based around primarily beating Musashi's style and secondly being generally effective against the common, during the period steadily growing, kenjutsu. Finally, he did not beat Musashi. Both lived their lives following the duel claiming that they had lost, something I find it strange people so rarely interpret as a draw, and after the fight the man became Musashi's disciple. Now if he had been superior, why did he want to study under an inferior man? As quoted from Fightauthority.com: Many years later, Gonnosuke fought Musashi again. This time around, the two samurai attacked simultaneously, stopping just before connecting with their strikes. They recognized that if they had finished their attacks, both men would have died. This draw was the closest anyone ever got to defeat Musashi.If I were about to die from a strike, I'd consider it a loss on my end; if I was perfect, I would have been able to do something to avoid it. However, the man probably chose to study under Musashi because he realized that he could become better than he was. Quote: I am in no way insulting Jodo or its founder, but I find simple statements of Musashi's defeat somewhat annoying. I wasn't insulting Musashi either, but considering the nature of Katana fanboys, I feel it had to be said-no one is invincible.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 2:55 am
I can't believe anyone has not mentioned the mace, flail, morning star, warhammer, pickhammer yet. Doesn't anyone think that these weaopns also have their uses against opponents? I personally am fond of the mace and flail. I would like to see a samurai try to block one of those! Even though I respect the Samurai, medieval weaponry is just more practical and adaptive.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 6:49 am
Gloglablyn I can't believe anyone has not mentioned the mace, flail, morning star, warhammer, pickhammer yet. Doesn't anyone think that these weaopns also have their uses against opponents? I personally am fond of the mace and flail. I would like to see a samurai try to block one of those! Even though I respect the Samurai, medieval weaponry is just more practical and adaptive. Mentioning every weapon that can possibly have a practical application in combat against an opponent wielding a katana isn't really what the discussion is about. The discussion, as far as I know, was meant to dispell the illusion of mysterious perfection with which the media has labelled the katana. Then again, your arguments take for granted that people would attempt to block you. The only place where blocking is commonplace in a swordfight is fiction and most people in real life would prefer dodging or countering with an attack of their own.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 10:16 am
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|