|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:45 pm
Tecnia Heck, they better come back. My three favorite charectors can't just be gone... Except for Kasha, cause y'know...she died. But Spader and Gunny, if they don't come back, I'll be in depression. And depression is not fun. ...lol Or maybe MacHale got rid of them for a specific reason, so that maybe it'll all come down to Pendragon & Dane. Wait...then why didn't Loor die? Maybe she needs to be in the story just for a while longer, and then at the end she'll die? But that would just be evil... burning_eyes Gah. I'm confuzzled. Sorry, I'm just having another conversation with myself... sweatdrop Lol mrgreen noooooo don't say that Loor will die at the end of the series. I mean it would be a really sad for Bobby because he loves her remember.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Targeted They will get out. Dont worry. yeah I think theyll show up again sometime in the series
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:45 pm
Raidens_Dragon Tecnia Heck, they better come back. My three favorite charectors can't just be gone... Except for Kasha, cause y'know...she died. But Spader and Gunny, if they don't come back, I'll be in depression. And depression is not fun. ...lol Or maybe MacHale got rid of them for a specific reason, so that maybe it'll all come down to Pendragon & Dane. Wait...then why didn't Loor die? Maybe she needs to be in the story just for a while longer, and then at the end she'll die? But that would just be evil... burning_eyes Gah. I'm confuzzled. Sorry, I'm just having another conversation with myself... sweatdrop Lol mrgreen noooooo don't say that Loor will die at the end of the series. I mean it would be a really sad for Bobby because he loves her remember. Yeah well, Bobby probably dissapears at the end, seeing as they're illusions or however you spell that and then the very end is told by Mark and Courtney or something.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:29 am
Zanny_Yosho Raidens_Dragon Tecnia Heck, they better come back. My three favorite charectors can't just be gone... Except for Kasha, cause y'know...she died. But Spader and Gunny, if they don't come back, I'll be in depression. And depression is not fun. ...lol Or maybe MacHale got rid of them for a specific reason, so that maybe it'll all come down to Pendragon & Dane. Wait...then why didn't Loor die? Maybe she needs to be in the story just for a while longer, and then at the end she'll die? But that would just be evil... burning_eyes Gah. I'm confuzzled. Sorry, I'm just having another conversation with myself... sweatdrop Lol mrgreen noooooo don't say that Loor will die at the end of the series. I mean it would be a really sad for Bobby because he loves her remember. Yeah well, Bobby probably dissapears at the end, seeing as they're illusions or however you spell that and then the very end is told by Mark and Courtney or something.quite possible
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:26 am
Would multiple flumes on Eelong matter? I mean, if the travaler from Eelong is dead than it just seems like all the flumes would collapes and leave Eelong completely disconected.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:27 pm
Lacia Would multiple flumes on Eelong matter? I mean, if the travaler from Eelong is dead than it just seems like all the flumes would collapes and leave Eelong completely disconected. Why would the flume collaspe if the traveler is dead?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:02 pm
Targeted Lacia Would multiple flumes on Eelong matter? I mean, if the travaler from Eelong is dead than it just seems like all the flumes would collapes and leave Eelong completely disconected. Why would the flume collaspe if the traveler is dead? There's still travelers so teh flume wouldnt collapse
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:04 pm
GreatBuddha Targeted Lacia Would multiple flumes on Eelong matter? I mean, if the travaler from Eelong is dead than it just seems like all the flumes would collapes and leave Eelong completely disconected. Why would the flume collaspe if the traveler is dead? There's still travelers so teh flume wouldnt collapse But there are no more travelers from Eelong. Thats what she is talking about. Spoiler --> But if this were true, Ibara's flume would collaspe.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:24 pm
Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted Lacia Would multiple flumes on Eelong matter? I mean, if the travaler from Eelong is dead than it just seems like all the flumes would collapes and leave Eelong completely disconected. Why would the flume collaspe if the traveler is dead? There's still travelers so teh flume wouldnt collapse But there are no more travelers from Eelong. Thats what she is talking about. Spoiler --> But if this were true, Ibara's flume would collaspe. Ah, yeah sorry misread it. I dunno, but that is true of ibara.So I guess the Flumes are there regardless of wether there's a travelor or not
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:29 pm
GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted Lacia Would multiple flumes on Eelong matter? I mean, if the travaler from Eelong is dead than it just seems like all the flumes would collapes and leave Eelong completely disconected. Why would the flume collaspe if the traveler is dead? There's still travelers so teh flume wouldnt collapse But there are no more travelers from Eelong. Thats what she is talking about. Spoiler --> But if this were true, Ibara's flume would collaspe. Ah, yeah sorry misread it. I dunno, but that is true of ibara.So I guess the Flumes are there regardless of wether there's a travelor or not Yeah. I mean, since these are the last travelers, the territories shouls stay after all the travelers are gone.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:31 pm
Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted Lacia Would multiple flumes on Eelong matter? I mean, if the travaler from Eelong is dead than it just seems like all the flumes would collapes and leave Eelong completely disconected. Why would the flume collaspe if the traveler is dead? There's still travelers so teh flume wouldnt collapse But there are no more travelers from Eelong. Thats what she is talking about. Spoiler --> But if this were true, Ibara's flume would collaspe. Ah, yeah sorry misread it. I dunno, but that is true of ibara.So I guess the Flumes are there regardless of wether there's a travelor or not Yeah. I mean, since these are the last travelers, the territories shouls stay after all the travelers are gone. Im thinking that after a set many of years there will be more travelers. Its like a cycle. and Its the waiting period before the new ones arrive
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:32 pm
GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha There's still travelers so teh flume wouldnt collapse But there are no more travelers from Eelong. Thats what she is talking about. Spoiler --> But if this were true, Ibara's flume would collaspe. Ah, yeah sorry misread it. I dunno, but that is true of ibara.So I guess the Flumes are there regardless of wether there's a travelor or not Yeah. I mean, since these are the last travelers, the territories shouls stay after all the travelers are gone. Im thinking that after a set many of years there will be more travelers. Its like a cycle. and Its the waiting period before the new ones arrive Well maybe once Sd is gone, the Travelers will be gone, too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:37 pm
Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha There's still travelers so teh flume wouldnt collapse But there are no more travelers from Eelong. Thats what she is talking about. Spoiler --> But if this were true, Ibara's flume would collaspe. Ah, yeah sorry misread it. I dunno, but that is true of ibara.So I guess the Flumes are there regardless of wether there's a travelor or not Yeah. I mean, since these are the last travelers, the territories shouls stay after all the travelers are gone. Im thinking that after a set many of years there will be more travelers. Its like a cycle. and Its the waiting period before the new ones arrive Well maybe once Sd is gone, the Travelers will be gone, too. yeah since maybe the travelers are there because its Halla's way of balancing out SD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:41 pm
GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Ah, yeah sorry misread it. I dunno, but that is true of ibara.So I guess the Flumes are there regardless of wether there's a travelor or not Yeah. I mean, since these are the last travelers, the territories shouls stay after all the travelers are gone. Im thinking that after a set many of years there will be more travelers. Its like a cycle. and Its the waiting period before the new ones arrive Well maybe once Sd is gone, the Travelers will be gone, too. yeah since maybe the travelers are there because its Halla's way of balancing out SD Then again, Sd is a traveler himslef. Plus Nevva.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:42 pm
Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Targeted GreatBuddha Ah, yeah sorry misread it. I dunno, but that is true of ibara.So I guess the Flumes are there regardless of wether there's a travelor or not Yeah. I mean, since these are the last travelers, the territories shouls stay after all the travelers are gone. Im thinking that after a set many of years there will be more travelers. Its like a cycle. and Its the waiting period before the new ones arrive Well maybe once Sd is gone, the Travelers will be gone, too. yeah since maybe the travelers are there because its Halla's way of balancing out SD Then again, Sd is a traveler himslef. Plus Nevva. It could also be the whole Ying and Yang thing going on
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|