|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 1:18 pm
FreeArsenal cactuar tamer FreeArsenal And how can you say people practiced sex in history if men in ancient Greece and Rome married a woman only to have infidelities with other men? We can find documents on that, so how does that relate to your idea of what marriage meant in history? The logic really fails here. The if = then formula doesn't work if you base it of of a false assumption, Free. False Logic If people have sex outside of marriage, then none of the purposes of getting married are to have sex. -- Doesn't make sense. If people eat food outside of restauraunts, then the none of the purposes of going to a restauraunt are to eat food. --- Doesn't really make sense either does it? Being unfaithul to your spouse doesn't mean you're not having sex with her. These men were getting heirs from thier wives, not their homosexual lovers, and I don't think turkey basters had been invented yet. Marital infidelity does not deny the existance of marriage as a sexual relationship. Try again. Why should I try again just because you don't like it? Because you were wrong. I'm telling you 2+2 does not equal 5 quite plainly, and demonstrating my point to be true. The only reason for this most latest reply that I can fathom is that you don't have a rebuttal. In which case, I'll re-iterate what I said in the other thread: Shut up, or stop jerking me around. This guild was created for people to debate seriously away from trolls and idiots. If you can't take it seriously, then distance yourself. If you don't see the point to debating, then keep it to the teeming masses of tweens in ED.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 2:01 pm
cactuar tamer Because you were wrong. I'm telling you 2+2 does not equal 5 quite plainly, and demonstrating my point to be true. The only reason for this most latest reply that I can fathom is that you don't have a rebuttal. In which case, I'll re-iterate what I said in the other thread: Shut up, or stop jerking me around. This guild was created for people to debate seriously away from trolls and idiots. If you can't take it seriously, then distance yourself. If you don't see the point to debating, then keep it to the teeming masses of tweens in ED. I see you like to use an Ad-hominem attack. You don't realize that the abortion debate in itself is regulated only to opinions, everything written and done by medical doctors, scientists and even people who fight for pro-life or pro-choice are all biased to one side of the opinion table. In what you say, 2+2=5 when I see the equation you make, to me it's correct and 2+2=4. So if you can't see how an opinion can change the whole equation, then you're in the wrong place, and should just go away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 5:41 pm
FreeArsenal cactuar tamer Because you were wrong. I'm telling you 2+2 does not equal 5 quite plainly, and demonstrating my point to be true. The only reason for this most latest reply that I can fathom is that you don't have a rebuttal. In which case, I'll re-iterate what I said in the other thread: Shut up, or stop jerking me around. This guild was created for people to debate seriously away from trolls and idiots. If you can't take it seriously, then distance yourself. If you don't see the point to debating, then keep it to the teeming masses of tweens in ED. I see you like to use an Ad-hominem attack. You don't realize that the abortion debate in itself is regulated only to opinions, everything written and done by medical doctors, scientists and even people who fight for pro-life or pro-choice are all biased to one side of the opinion table. In what you say, 2+2=5 when I see the equation you make, to me it's correct and 2+2=4. So if you can't see how an opinion can change the whole equation, then you're in the wrong place, and should just go away. If you can't stop blowing smoke when I call you out about refusing to provide a RELEVANT rebuttal to an argument, then you are in the wrong place, and should go away. If it was your OPINION that an amulet would protect you from bullets, it wouldn't make you any less dead at the end of the day. You -------> This Getting back to the topic False Logic If people have sex outside of marriage, then none of the purposes of getting married are to have sex. -- Doesn't make sense. If people eat food outside of restauraunts, then the none of the purposes of going to a restauraunt are to eat food. --- Doesn't really make sense either does it? Being unfaithul to your spouse doesn't mean you're not having sex with her. These men were getting heirs from thier wives, not their homosexual lovers, and I don't think turkey basters had been invented yet. Marital infidelity does not deny the existance of marriage as a sexual relationship. For the sake of novelty, could you please try to Stick to the subject, formulate relevant rebuttals and make an effort to support your position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2005 1:57 pm
It's sad you result to name calling. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2005 5:31 pm
cactuar tamer FreeArsenal It's sad you result to name calling. xd  It's sad that you are unwilling to debate, and ironic that you've proved my point with yet another excuse for not offering a rebuttal. don't see what has you so upset, cactuar. But afterall, someone unwilling to debate usually ticks ye off. A stiff upper lip is needed for debate, along with a thick skin. Not these childish remarks, obvious insults and name calling. Never go into an argument angry, or you'll just leave it angerier. Either way, being angry in an argument never helps. Destress yourself and move on. However, I'm not advocating that we shouldn't do something about people like Free Arsenal. In fact, I think I know just the thing to cheer you up. Maybe you should hangout with me and talk for a little.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2005 5:54 pm
Veled cactuar tamer FreeArsenal It's sad you result to name calling. xd It's sad that you are unwilling to debate, and ironic that you've proved my point with yet another excuse for not offering a rebuttal. don't see what has you so upset, cactuar. But afterall, someone unwilling to debate usually ticks ye off. A stiff upper lip is needed for debate, along with a thick skin. Not these childish remarks, obvious insults and name calling. Never go into an argument angry, or you'll just leave it angerier. Either way, being angry in an argument never helps. Destress yourself and move on. However, I'm not advocating that we shouldn't do something about people like Free Arsenal. In fact, I think I know just the thing to cheer you up. Maybe you should hangout with me and talk for a little. Ah, I guess I shouln't have let my self get so upset. Sometimes I tend to carry things farther than they have to go. Everything would probabably work out more smoothly if I didn't get worked up. Easing up and taking things less seriously might help. Hainging out sounds fun ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2005 6:41 pm
Veled cactuar tamer FreeArsenal It's sad you result to name calling. xd It's sad that you are unwilling to debate, and ironic that you've proved my point with yet another excuse for not offering a rebuttal. don't see what has you so upset, cactuar. But afterall, someone unwilling to debate usually ticks ye off. A stiff upper lip is needed for debate, along with a thick skin. Not these childish remarks, obvious insults and name calling. Never go into an argument angry, or you'll just leave it angerier. Either way, being angry in an argument never helps. Destress yourself and move on. However, I'm not advocating that we shouldn't do something about people like Free Arsenal. In fact, I think I know just the thing to cheer you up. Maybe you should hangout with me and talk for a little. Veled must you use subliminal messaging about personal issues? EDIT: Thread's closed until further notice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
