|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:53 pm
@infernal: lolz okay. XD
@deathgod: but shes kind of right. not because of homoseua;lity, but even then, if god turns out to be real I AM SO BONED. anyway i wasnt really offended cuz im atheist, and if it turns out im wrong im going to make him swallow his teeth. oh my god i am putting that on my epitaph.
@bleeding angel: yeah eÎpt if i ever have gay se% its gonna be oral because either i stick my d**k in the same place where s**t comes from or PAIN.
@b100dless: unfortunately im the kind of guy wholl actually do that. PICS NAO IM NOT FAPPIN TO YER AVI.
@maui: thats probably because, you know, you dont have the fetish. anyway i actually get kind of sad when i watch it cuz the girl almost always dies and it FEELS BAD MAN. also the only reason i added the haters gonna hate is because this is the internet. anonymity+audience=TOTAL d**k. im not ashamed. i dont give a damn about other peoples' opinions. but im in high sch001 and i do give a damn about people ******** with me EVERY SINGLE DAY if i come out to the eye are ells. ever heard of a town called laramie? one gay kid bleeding to death cuz of ******** is already too many. when i graduate, however, i am going to touch SO MANY PENISES.
@elyzia: why are you so ******** c001. heart
@wild child: even though erryones gettin pissed and all im not actually offended that much. and seeing as you werent trying to, its fine. neutral
@rock: THIS.
@kira: SO JEALOUS yeah my parents are hos and make me go to church and it SUCKS d**k :c
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:01 pm
:3 have a happy life being gay/bi curious
hope you meet someone who loves you just the way your are biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:17 pm
Congrats! I love futa too, but I still classify as straight. For one, I can never see myself in any sort of romantic relationship with a male and (more importantly) while the organ itself doesn't turn me off, knowing that it's attached to a man does. I've long wished that I had it in me to be bisexual, but the idea of any sexual contact with a man (at least without a woman being involved) does little to nothing for me. More power to you, though, and as I said, congratulations oj coming out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:19 pm
Hey, love is love. heart Lol, I love who your so laid back about this like it's an everyday thing. But in all seriousness, I'm happy for you and like NerdOrgy said, I hope you find someone who loves you for you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:20 pm
Matasoga Congrats! I love futa too, but I still classify as straight. For one, I can never see myself in any sort of romantic relationship with a male and (more importantly) while the organ itself doesn't turn me off, knowing that it's attached to a man does. I've long wished that I had it in me to be bisexual, but the idea of any sexual contact with a man (at least without a woman being involved) does little to nothing for me. More power to you, though, and as I said, congratulations oj coming out. eh. . . same goes for me i guess but i could see myself with another woman tho i just prefer guys
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:21 pm
yay!!! im special!!!! biggrin heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:41 pm
elyzia Rock4ourRock elyzia Quote: it goes against my religion If you're going to believe in whatever your religion says you should, you should seriously consider learning more about your religion's beliefs first. Nowhere in the bible does it say a single word against homosexual marriage. You are the apple... Couldnt you associate homosexual marriage with homosexuality as a whole?
and I am your core. Well, yeah; it's not like it's a huge leap or anything to assume that if you think being homosexual is wrong you also think letting homosexuals get married is wrong. It's definitely fair to assume that if ******** was alive today, they'd be against homosexual marriage (I can't possibly imagine homosexual marriage existed as any sort of issue or topic or discussion 2,000 years ago). Then again, though, if the people who wrote the bible were alive today, they'd change their minds about a whole ton of things, & the entire thing would fall apart at its seams. If people are going to believe what the bible says & exactly what the bible says, & the bible says nothing about the issue of homosexual marriage, then either they should have no opinion on the issue or form their own & not claim that that opinion was taught to them by the bible, since it wasn't... ... That's all kind of irrelevant to the point I was originally making to the OP, though. The OP said she didn't have a problem with homosexuals & all that, but that she was specifically against homosexual marriage because her religion says so. Hopefully the reason I mentioned that the bible doesn't say homosexual marriage is wrong makes more sense given the context? Fun fact: Ancient Hebrew language didn't even have a word for "Homosexuals" or "Homosexuality." Most passages that the small-minded fear mongers lean on actually refer to male prostitutes, but given our laughably bad grasp of the language during the time of King James, that's what we came up with. Just one of the reasons why enlightenment, information, and education have such a hard time coexisting with bigotry.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:48 pm
Matasoga elyzia Rock4ourRock elyzia Quote: it goes against my religion If you're going to believe in whatever your religion says you should, you should seriously consider learning more about your religion's beliefs first. Nowhere in the bible does it say a single word against homosexual marriage. You are the apple... Couldnt you associate homosexual marriage with homosexuality as a whole?
and I am your core. Well, yeah; it's not like it's a huge leap or anything to assume that if you think being homosexual is wrong you also think letting homosexuals get married is wrong. It's definitely fair to assume that if ******** was alive today, they'd be against homosexual marriage (I can't possibly imagine homosexual marriage existed as any sort of issue or topic or discussion 2,000 years ago). Then again, though, if the people who wrote the bible were alive today, they'd change their minds about a whole ton of things, & the entire thing would fall apart at its seams. If people are going to believe what the bible says & exactly what the bible says, & the bible says nothing about the issue of homosexual marriage, then either they should have no opinion on the issue or form their own & not claim that that opinion was taught to them by the bible, since it wasn't... ... That's all kind of irrelevant to the point I was originally making to the OP, though. The OP said she didn't have a problem with homosexuals & all that, but that she was specifically against homosexual marriage because her religion says so. Hopefully the reason I mentioned that the bible doesn't say homosexual marriage is wrong makes more sense given the context? Fun fact: Ancient Hebrew language didn't even have a word for "Homosexuals" or "Homosexuality." Most passages that the small-minded fear mongers lean on actually refer to male prostitutes, but given our laughably bad grasp of the language during the time of King James, that's what we came up with. Just one of the reasons why enlightenment, information, and education have such a hard time coexisting with bigotry.
You are the apple...
That's an interesting idea. Care to cite it for me?
and I am your core.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:57 pm
Rock4ourRock Matasoga elyzia Rock4ourRock elyzia Quote: it goes against my religion If you're going to believe in whatever your religion says you should, you should seriously consider learning more about your religion's beliefs first. Nowhere in the bible does it say a single word against homosexual marriage. You are the apple... Couldnt you associate homosexual marriage with homosexuality as a whole?
and I am your core. Well, yeah; it's not like it's a huge leap or anything to assume that if you think being homosexual is wrong you also think letting homosexuals get married is wrong. It's definitely fair to assume that if ******** was alive today, they'd be against homosexual marriage (I can't possibly imagine homosexual marriage existed as any sort of issue or topic or discussion 2,000 years ago). Then again, though, if the people who wrote the bible were alive today, they'd change their minds about a whole ton of things, & the entire thing would fall apart at its seams. If people are going to believe what the bible says & exactly what the bible says, & the bible says nothing about the issue of homosexual marriage, then either they should have no opinion on the issue or form their own & not claim that that opinion was taught to them by the bible, since it wasn't... ... That's all kind of irrelevant to the point I was originally making to the OP, though. The OP said she didn't have a problem with homosexuals & all that, but that she was specifically against homosexual marriage because her religion says so. Hopefully the reason I mentioned that the bible doesn't say homosexual marriage is wrong makes more sense given the context? Fun fact: Ancient Hebrew language didn't even have a word for "Homosexuals" or "Homosexuality." Most passages that the small-minded fear mongers lean on actually refer to male prostitutes, but given our laughably bad grasp of the language during the time of King James, that's what we came up with. Just one of the reasons why enlightenment, information, and education have such a hard time coexisting with bigotry. You are the apple... That's an interesting idea. Care to cite it for me?
and I am your core. Unfortunately, I didn't come armed with citations. You were right to call me out on this, but I'm afraid that I can't back it up, right now. I encourage you to look into it, as it is an argument that I do believe that I have heard multiple times from disparate sources. Please, do look into it, sometime and I'll do the same. Except for that we had a relatively poor understanding of the original Hebrew in the time of King James. I feel that particular statement needs no citation.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:23 pm
NerdOrgy Matasoga Congrats! I love futa too, but I still classify as straight. For one, I can never see myself in any sort of romantic relationship with a male and (more importantly) while the organ itself doesn't turn me off, knowing that it's attached to a man does. I've long wished that I had it in me to be bisexual, but the idea of any sexual contact with a man (at least without a woman being involved) does little to nothing for me. More power to you, though, and as I said, congratulations oj coming out. eh. . . same goes for me i guess but i could see myself with another woman tho i just prefer guys we are all best friends now okay. FUTA BROS 4 LYFE also nerdorgy is THE BEST FREAKING NAME and matasoga your argument doesnt need a citation. the bible has been translated so many times that its not even the word of god anymore, its the word of whichever biased translator you happen to get stuck with depending on which version you follow. like if i were to write a holy book containing the word "stumped" in it, 2000 years from now people would be getting killed over whether or not i meant "unable to think of something" or "the removal of all of one's limbs." (fun fact: i found that pun on a quad amputee thread on /d/ and it totally made the disconcerted erection i had developed by the time i got there and the uncertainty of whether to update my list of fetishes totally worth it)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:29 pm
biggrin why thank you , it took some time to think it up ^-^
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:37 pm
Internet Noir but shes kind of right. not because of homoseua;lity, but even then, if god turns out to be real I AM SO BONED. anyway i wasnt really offended cuz im atheist, and if it turns out im wrong im going to make him swallow his teeth. oh my god i am putting that on my epitaph. Well you know, if he is real and all, I'm not doubting him, but you won't be able to "Make him swallow his teeth" Cause you are so going to Hell. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:32 pm
Internet Noir @b100dless: unfortunately im the kind of guy wholl actually do that. PICS NAO IM NOT FAPPIN TO YER AVI. Honestly. It doesn't bother me. XD I mean, so what if a guy fantasizes about me or hits on me? It doesn't mean anything about me. I mean, I wouldn't like someone to make a move on me without my permission, but surely everyone has a problem with sexual molestation/rape? There seems to be this weird misconception the homosexuality=SERIAL RAPIST. ANYWAY. I actually was debating putting a pic up of me on the pictures thread, but be forwarned: YOU WILL BE DISSAPOINTED.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:36 pm
o--o woah i love your bloody avi
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|