|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:04 pm
I feel dark bride is just like solmen being that both should be used at aprpriate times. For instance I only use bribes on anything thats going to cost me the game if I don't or on heavy storm, mirror force, Torrential tribute or even lighting vortex. I try to only use it on those types of cards because doing so ensures I've gotten rid of the one copy they have of the card making it to where I'm free from worrie or if bribe a lighting vortex it was because they ditch a card so potentially they are doing a 2 for 2 trade off essentially not getting the plus one. I still however like solmen better and I am waiting and hoping that eventially it will be at 2 or back to 3. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:15 pm
2 would be ok. but still overkill. 1 is just not enough and 2 is too many.... such a hassle. anyway, whats your opinion on this deck ?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:51 am
Well a guy that just randomly showed up at my locals this month plays gravekeepers (possibly the reason he came back into the game) and hes really excited about the new cards. In my opinion your build seems to be the norm for gravekeepers. Possibly only thing I would change about it is the allure count should be at two. I think that you should take the pheniox wing wind blast down to one. I've used it before and one is usable, but two not always the best answer to a problem at hand.
I suppose if I were to play gravekeepers I would play it much differently, but this is just because I like to think outside the box. I don't like playing the same deck everyone else plays. I played LS Twilight for the last 3 1/2 months now just so that I could get a feel for honest at three before something happens to the deck. I didn't play the same Twilight build that big tournament winners played mainly because I was out of my element playing with LS for the first time. If I were to play this deck I would find a way to capitilze on the strengths of the deck. As for your build it looks average. I hope it works out for you. I couldn't tell you from experince what I think the most approriate gravekeeper deck should or in the future will look like because I haven't had any real experince playing the deck just playing agianst the deck.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:12 am
the reason why i have 1 allure is because its limited on the new list. so i figured i might as well construct it with one
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:00 am
I thought that this was for the current format, but yah then keep it to one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:29 pm
changed the deck up again. tell me what you think ?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:25 pm
it good, but you should definately main deck deck devastation virus. it's so wicked in GK.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:54 pm
axean it good, but you should definately main deck deck devastation virus. it's so wicked in GK. how so ? it only destroys 1500atk or less. that hits just tuners... mainly
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:57 pm
Dr Iceic axean it good, but you should definately main deck deck devastation virus. it's so wicked in GK. how so ? it only destroys 1500atk or less. that hits just tuners... mainly thats good. having one in your deck for tuner destruction is good... except for decks that don't use tuners... okay side deck it. xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:09 pm
XD ill attempt to get an ulti
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:13 pm
Dr Iceic XD ill attempt to get an ulti yay
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|