|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:02 pm
shrab Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab um first who said loser? second i actually do win with frog not as much as a meta deck could but that has never been my goal. now no i won't make that bet even if i thought i could win against your with my current deck the fact that i have no idea what you'll use just lowers my chances further. im not that stupid. now i simply just want you to stop being rude it ruins the whole point of posting decks in the database. One "the two losers" knowingly implying me and one other person "leaving said person blank because he isn't needed" Two, I can care less who plays your so called meta decks local's don't count, locals are ******** easy. I win mine almost every week. Three, I bet you wouldn't make that bet after calling someone out because obviously you have no skill in this game. No I've always given correct advice rather my posts are blunt and rude. People are stupid to nice advice and nice advice is usually wrong. edited out the who said loser part just noticed now lets see this is a card game correct? yes im fairly sure i am there. so how hard is it to actually help the deck instead of saying its s**t? and i am refering to the meta in general not at locals. and if u would like to describe what you think the meta is then please do so because i think we are refering to the same set of decks but im begging to wonder. also i never called you out. i simply asked you to do something. you in turn tried to make a bet with me that you undoubtedly knew you would win just to be an a*****e (which i am only assuming you thought i would jump at the chance) correct advice? i saw no advice on here i only saw you say it was s**t and that isnt advice its an insult. In here, I give advice everywhere. No I was making that claim based of you calling me a loser and you edited it out, If that's the case then I'll gladly take back that statement. As for correcting a bad deck, I've done so about three times one involving you and you bitched out due to not having alot of money. There is no saving failed archetypes or random decks such as this thus "this deck isn't great" is the proper term. Not to mention I was originally calling this f** out for turning down critizim. ok yes ill admit that i was having a bad day then and i apologize for the back and forth then but even still dinosaur decks with a little help are pretty good. anyway im satisfied here so yeah. hey im about to post another deck but before i do imma ask you before then just to avoid the critisizm now. im about to post a fish deck any beforehand comments? Wrong it's in the list of failed archtypes. Then you have anti meta which are decks meant for locals where your frogs would be located. Then you have tier decks which are meant for regs nats sjcs worlds. Which consist of bwings/glads/ls/twilight/zombies/chaos/chaos stun/rogue decks *a very well though out original deck idea* As for fish i wouldn't bother, frogs are the closest thing to a good pure water archetype.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:07 pm
Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab um first who said loser? second i actually do win with frog not as much as a meta deck could but that has never been my goal. now no i won't make that bet even if i thought i could win against your with my current deck the fact that i have no idea what you'll use just lowers my chances further. im not that stupid. now i simply just want you to stop being rude it ruins the whole point of posting decks in the database. One "the two losers" knowingly implying me and one other person "leaving said person blank because he isn't needed" Two, I can care less who plays your so called meta decks local's don't count, locals are ******** easy. I win mine almost every week. Three, I bet you wouldn't make that bet after calling someone out because obviously you have no skill in this game. No I've always given correct advice rather my posts are blunt and rude. People are stupid to nice advice and nice advice is usually wrong. edited out the who said loser part just noticed now lets see this is a card game correct? yes im fairly sure i am there. so how hard is it to actually help the deck instead of saying its s**t? and i am refering to the meta in general not at locals. and if u would like to describe what you think the meta is then please do so because i think we are refering to the same set of decks but im begging to wonder. also i never called you out. i simply asked you to do something. you in turn tried to make a bet with me that you undoubtedly knew you would win just to be an a*****e (which i am only assuming you thought i would jump at the chance) correct advice? i saw no advice on here i only saw you say it was s**t and that isnt advice its an insult. In here, I give advice everywhere. No I was making that claim based of you calling me a loser and you edited it out, If that's the case then I'll gladly take back that statement. As for correcting a bad deck, I've done so about three times one involving you and you bitched out due to not having alot of money. There is no saving failed archetypes or random decks such as this thus "this deck isn't great" is the proper term. Not to mention I was originally calling this f** out for turning down critizim. ok yes ill admit that i was having a bad day then and i apologize for the back and forth then but even still dinosaur decks with a little help are pretty good. anyway im satisfied here so yeah. hey im about to post another deck but before i do imma ask you before then just to avoid the critisizm now. im about to post a fish deck any beforehand comments? Wrong it's in the list of failed archtypes. Then you have anti meta which are decks meant for locals where your frogs would be located. Then you have tier decks which are meant for regs nats sjcs worlds. Which consist of bwings/glads/ls/twilight/zombies/chaos/chaos stun/rogue decks *a very well though out original deck idea* As for fish i wouldn't bother, frogs are the closest thing to a good pure water archetype. well if i can find ways to get out coelacanth out faster it might work out sorta well. im mean think about it i get him out discard one cards and i can synch twice. obviously one for stardust and the other for whatever then lets say i have a dark bribe down. thats a decent field i think. ofcoarse thats not all itd be doing but eh. oh well i guess ill stop posting here.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:10 pm
shrab Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab edited out the who said loser part just noticed now lets see this is a card game correct? yes im fairly sure i am there. so how hard is it to actually help the deck instead of saying its s**t? and i am refering to the meta in general not at locals. and if u would like to describe what you think the meta is then please do so because i think we are refering to the same set of decks but im begging to wonder. also i never called you out. i simply asked you to do something. you in turn tried to make a bet with me that you undoubtedly knew you would win just to be an a*****e (which i am only assuming you thought i would jump at the chance) correct advice? i saw no advice on here i only saw you say it was s**t and that isnt advice its an insult. In here, I give advice everywhere. No I was making that claim based of you calling me a loser and you edited it out, If that's the case then I'll gladly take back that statement. As for correcting a bad deck, I've done so about three times one involving you and you bitched out due to not having alot of money. There is no saving failed archetypes or random decks such as this thus "this deck isn't great" is the proper term. Not to mention I was originally calling this f** out for turning down critizim. ok yes ill admit that i was having a bad day then and i apologize for the back and forth then but even still dinosaur decks with a little help are pretty good. anyway im satisfied here so yeah. hey im about to post another deck but before i do imma ask you before then just to avoid the critisizm now. im about to post a fish deck any beforehand comments? Wrong it's in the list of failed archtypes. Then you have anti meta which are decks meant for locals where your frogs would be located. Then you have tier decks which are meant for regs nats sjcs worlds. Which consist of bwings/glads/ls/twilight/zombies/chaos/chaos stun/rogue decks *a very well though out original deck idea* As for fish i wouldn't bother, frogs are the closest thing to a good pure water archetype. well if i can find ways to get out coelacanth out faster it might work out sorta well. im mean think about it i get him out discard one cards and i can synch twice. obviously one for stardust and the other for whatever then lets say i have a dark bribe down. thats a decent field i think. ofcoarse thats not all itd be doing but eh. oh well i guess ill stop posting here. It takes alot to get that card going and to maintain a consistant deck with him. If he was a one tribute then sure I'd say I'd gladly
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:11 pm
he is with legendary ocean on the field thats why im adding in two or three of them and two warrior of atlantis (its search monster)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:16 pm
shrab he is with legendary ocean on the field thats why im adding in two or three of them and two warrior of atlantis (its search monster) Field cards are the worst game mechanic. I know what warrior does. the only DECENT field cards are sky scraper for little city and the seal of orichalcos which hasn't been legaly in print minus the side event in 2003/04
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:19 pm
Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab he is with legendary ocean on the field thats why im adding in two or three of them and two warrior of atlantis (its search monster) Field cards are the worst game mechanic. I know what warrior does. the only DECENT field cards are sky scraper for little city and the seal of orichalcos which hasn't been legaly in print minus the side event in 2003/04 hmmm ok ill go ahead and scrap that idea. im trying to think of a deck i can make that will actually be able to compete. my frogs are my deck i just like playing with... hmmm any ideas on something that could be somewhat easy to get together?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:10 pm
O3o god.. all over a Deck.. Thats Foolish to Fight over. Tata :3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:30 pm
To the OP I've got a spellcaster/fiend deck that works quite well, so dont listen to the people who say something doesnt work, unless they have played the EXACT deck you posted, they cant say s**t.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:45 am
Emporer NeoWing To the OP I've got a spellcaster/fiend deck that works quite well. You mean that pile? It's s**t.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:25 pm
Yuu_Kanda_exorcist shrab once again the 2 losers are here to hate on another deck. listen you two just because it isnt meta doesnt make it s**t. and it is rude of you to give such critical opinions on every deck you see. so i will ask this nicely. please do not comment any longer unless it is constructive minus the superior douchebag insults such as "bold shows you suck at this game and aren't looking for any constructive advice. Most idiots type that." now i kinda like this deck and have a friend who run dino's very well. heres an idea. try to find a tuner and synchro that might go well in here. because gilasaurus might work really well at etting out some synchros. not a fully evolved idea but its worth thinking about. Loser? Excuse us for being correct. Sorry you suck at this game. tell ya what how about we play a game, if I win I get all your gaia items and if you win you get all of mine on both accounts. That is what you ALWAYS do. If I was a mod, I would ban your a** right now.
Try to be civil, and stop being a ******** troll. Excuse my language.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:42 pm
i completely agree with u, Shippo, but you're wasting your time asking him to stop. trollers do what they do best: demean and insult any and everyone who doesn't meet with their standards. just let it be. stare
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:15 pm
Fresh Porn Sigh, lets make a dino deck that can actually do something. Can't wait for the dino tuners to come out. As for the basic plan. Beat down, Remove from play,get out a tyranno infinity for an otk smackdown albeit this is a rough draft I whipped up Monsters: 18 3 Sabersaurus 3 Tyranno Infinity 3 Hydrogeddon 2 Hyper Hammerhead 2 Black Veloci 2 Destroyer Saurus 2 Ultimate Tyranno 1 Black Tyranno Spells: 14 2 Dimensional Fissure 2 Jurrasic World 2 Fossil Dig2 Burden of the Mighty2 Big Evolution Pill 1 Terraforming 1 Heavy Storm 1 Mystical Space Typhoon 1 Lightning Vortex Traps:8 3 Fossil Excavation2 Bottomless Traphole 1 Torrential Tribute 1 Return from the Different Dimensions 1 Mirror Force try something like my deck fix. it gives more beat stick with otk capabilities
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|