Welcome to Gaia! ::

The NFL Guild

Back to Guilds

A guild for fans of the game. 

Tags: National Football League, Football, Pigskin, American, Sports 

Reply The NFL Guild
Who will win next year? Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Austin Shipp

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:44 pm


if a team drives 99 yards and gets stuffed on the goal line and they dont score those 99 yards diddent count for s**t, brian stewart was the head of the defense till the bye week then wade took over. and now ellis will be out of the way, so they can let spencer shine, spencer has been compared to merriman and if he reaches his potential, dallas will win the NFC East. that 17 embarrasment, the cowboys team was a mess, not lack of talent but lack of leadership, as for the loss of T.O, who cares, Roy Williams, Austin, Crayton, Witten, Bennet,Barber,Jones,Choice, Dallas still has more weapons than any team in the NFC East
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 3:17 pm


Austin Shipp
if a team drives 99 yards and gets stuffed on the goal line and they dont score those 99 yards diddent count for s**t, brian stewart was the head of the defense till the bye week then wade took over. and now ellis will be out of the way, so they can let spencer shine, spencer has been compared to merriman and if he reaches his potential, dallas will win the NFC East. that 17 embarrasment, the cowboys team was a mess, not lack of talent but lack of leadership, as for the loss of T.O, who cares, Roy Williams, Austin, Crayton, Witten, Bennet,Barber,Jones,Choice, Dallas still has more weapons than any team in the NFC East


lets see, more weapons huh? philly, westbrook, mccoy, curtis, jackson, celek, mcnabb, avant, ingram, peters (has played TE in college and NFL), weaver, baskett... i can keep going. as for your mentions of those other players, Williams has to show who he really is this year or he was not worth the trade, austin is ok, Crayton is good to above average, Witten is one of the best, bennet is ok, barber is above average, jones is so-so, choice will show what he can do... ingram and maclin are going to show what they can do and were rated to be among the best draft picks this year with the chance to impact the starting/expanded roles on the teams they were drafted. Baskett has shown to be a pain in the butt to any team when he puts it together and has shown that he may be doing that, avant has shown to be a sure thing in the slot, westbrook even hurt is better than most with half the touches, celek busted out when given the start and most likely will not look back.. i could keep going. to say they have more weapons is just plain ignorant. Dallas, NYG and Philly all can lay claim to that compared to any other team in the league. But defensively, it as you say it was last year, which I remember it being the year before, then why is it that under wade they gave up more points and yards and almost everything else than they did earlier in the year and the year before? and as for those 99 yards, at least they get three points out of it. you are so against anything i say and dont want to admit you are wrong on things (where i have already admitted for myself) that you are trying to play symantics.

vegito61283


Austin Shipp

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 6:27 pm


vegito61283
Austin Shipp
if a team drives 99 yards and gets stuffed on the goal line and they dont score those 99 yards diddent count for s**t, brian stewart was the head of the defense till the bye week then wade took over. and now ellis will be out of the way, so they can let spencer shine, spencer has been compared to merriman and if he reaches his potential, dallas will win the NFC East. that 17 embarrasment, the cowboys team was a mess, not lack of talent but lack of leadership, as for the loss of T.O, who cares, Roy Williams, Austin, Crayton, Witten, Bennet,Barber,Jones,Choice, Dallas still has more weapons than any team in the NFC East


lets see, more weapons huh? philly, westbrook, mccoy, curtis, jackson, celek, mcnabb, avant, ingram, peters (has played TE in college and NFL), weaver, baskett... i can keep going. as for your mentions of those other players, Williams has to show who he really is this year or he was not worth the trade, austin is ok, Crayton is good to above average, Witten is one of the best, bennet is ok, barber is above average, jones is so-so, choice will show what he can do... ingram and maclin are going to show what they can do and were rated to be among the best draft picks this year with the chance to impact the starting/expanded roles on the teams they were drafted. Baskett has shown to be a pain in the butt to any team when he puts it together and has shown that he may be doing that, avant has shown to be a sure thing in the slot, westbrook even hurt is better than most with half the touches, celek busted out when given the start and most likely will not look back.. i could keep going. to say they have more weapons is just plain ignorant. Dallas, NYG and Philly all can lay claim to that compared to any other team in the league. But defensively, it as you say it was last year, which I remember it being the year before, then why is it that under wade they gave up more points and yards and almost everything else than they did earlier in the year and the year before? and as for those 99 yards, at least they get three points out of it. you are so against anything i say and dont want to admit you are wrong on things (where i have already admitted for myself) that you are trying to play symantics.


first who the hell are those clowns highlighted, yea i can so see reid putting peters at TE rolleyes , and how is jones so-so he only played in 6 games and got 4 total TDs and averaged 8.9 yards per carry.
and Bennet is OK, he had better stats than celek and they played an equal amount ,of time, so our 2nd string TE is better than your first. and look at what choice put up in the last 5 games of the season when he got to play,

Reciving Leaders Dallas
Jason Witten 81 Rec. 952 Yrds. 4 TD
Patrick Crayton 39 Rec. 550 Yrds. 4 TD
Roy Williams 36 Rec 430 Yrds 2 TD
Martellius Bennet 20 Rec 283 Yrds 4 TD
Marion Barber 52 Rec 417 Yrds 2 TD

Total of top 5 recivers 228 Rec 2632 Yrds 16 TD

Reciving Leaders Philly
Desean Jackson 62 Rec 912 Yrds 2TD
Brian Westbrook 54 Rec 402 Yrds 5 TD
Kevin Curtis 33 Rec 390 Yrds 2 TD
Hank Baskett 33 Rec 440 Yrds 3 TD
Brent Celek 27 Rec 318 1 TD

Total of Top 5 Recivers 209 Rec 2462 Yrds 13 TD

so the dallas recivers beat philly (not even counting T.O.s stats)

Top 3 Rushers Dallas
Marrion Barber 885 Yrds 3.7 Avg 7 TD
Felix Jones 266 Yrds 8.9 Avg 3 TD (only played in 6 games)
Tashard Choice 472 Yrds 5.1 Avg 2 TD
Total 1623 Yrds 4.5 Avg 12 TD

Top 3 rushers Philly
Brian Westbrook 936 Yrds 4.0 Avg 9 TD
Lorenzo Booker 53 Yrds 2.7 Avg 0 TD
Kyle Eckel 79 Yrds 3.1 Avg 0 TD

Total 1068 Yrds 3.9 Avg 9 TD

So there Backs Beat Philly too

Tony Romo 26 TD 14 INT 3448 Yrds 91.4 Rating (missed 3 games)

Donovan McNabb 23 TD 11 INT 3916 Yrds 86.4 Rating (played all games)
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 7:05 pm


Austin Shipp
vegito61283
Austin Shipp
if a team drives 99 yards and gets stuffed on the goal line and they dont score those 99 yards diddent count for s**t, brian stewart was the head of the defense till the bye week then wade took over. and now ellis will be out of the way, so they can let spencer shine, spencer has been compared to merriman and if he reaches his potential, dallas will win the NFC East. that 17 embarrasment, the cowboys team was a mess, not lack of talent but lack of leadership, as for the loss of T.O, who cares, Roy Williams, Austin, Crayton, Witten, Bennet,Barber,Jones,Choice, Dallas still has more weapons than any team in the NFC East


lets see, more weapons huh? philly, westbrook, mccoy, curtis, jackson, celek, mcnabb, avant, ingram, peters (has played TE in college and NFL), weaver, baskett... i can keep going. as for your mentions of those other players, Williams has to show who he really is this year or he was not worth the trade, austin is ok, Crayton is good to above average, Witten is one of the best, bennet is ok, barber is above average, jones is so-so, choice will show what he can do... ingram and maclin are going to show what they can do and were rated to be among the best draft picks this year with the chance to impact the starting/expanded roles on the teams they were drafted. Baskett has shown to be a pain in the butt to any team when he puts it together and has shown that he may be doing that, avant has shown to be a sure thing in the slot, westbrook even hurt is better than most with half the touches, celek busted out when given the start and most likely will not look back.. i could keep going. to say they have more weapons is just plain ignorant. Dallas, NYG and Philly all can lay claim to that compared to any other team in the league. But defensively, it as you say it was last year, which I remember it being the year before, then why is it that under wade they gave up more points and yards and almost everything else than they did earlier in the year and the year before? and as for those 99 yards, at least they get three points out of it. you are so against anything i say and dont want to admit you are wrong on things (where i have already admitted for myself) that you are trying to play symantics.


first who the hell are those clowns highlighted, yea i can so see reid putting peters at TE rolleyes , and how is jones so-so he only played in 6 games and got 4 total TDs and averaged 8.9 yards per carry.
and Bennet is OK, he had better stats than celek and they played an equal amount ,of time, so our 2nd string TE is better than your first. and look at what choice put up in the last 5 games of the season when he got to play,

Reciving Leaders Dallas
Jason Witten 81 Rec. 952 Yrds. 4 TD
Patrick Crayton 39 Rec. 550 Yrds. 4 TD
Roy Williams 36 Rec 430 Yrds 2 TD
Martellius Bennet 20 Rec 283 Yrds 4 TD
Marion Barber 52 Rec 417 Yrds 2 TD

Total of top 5 recivers 228 Rec 2632 Yrds 16 TD

Reciving Leaders Philly
Desean Jackson 62 Rec 912 Yrds 2TD
Brian Westbrook 54 Rec 402 Yrds 5 TD
Kevin Curtis 33 Rec 390 Yrds 2 TD
Hank Baskett 33 Rec 440 Yrds 3 TD
Brent Celek 27 Rec 318 1 TD

Total of Top 5 Recivers 209 Rec 2462 Yrds 13 TD

so the dallas recivers beat philly (not even counting T.O.s stats)

Top 3 Rushers Dallas
Marrion Barber 885 Yrds 3.7 Avg 7 TD
Felix Jones 266 Yrds 8.9 Avg 3 TD (only played in 6 games)
Tashard Choice 472 Yrds 5.1 Avg 2 TD
Total 1623 Yrds 4.5 Avg 12 TD

Top 3 rushers Philly
Brian Westbrook 936 Yrds 4.0 Avg 9 TD
Lorenzo Booker 53 Yrds 2.7 Avg 0 TD
Kyle Eckel 79 Yrds 3.1 Avg 0 TD

Total 1068 Yrds 3.9 Avg 9 TD

So there Backs Beat Philly too

Tony Romo 26 TD 14 INT 3448 Yrds 91.4 Rating (missed 3 games)

Donovan McNabb 23 TD 11 INT 3916 Yrds 86.4 Rating (played all games)


well lets look at your stats since you seem to not want to look at any of mine. your recievers that you gave were thrown to 19 more times than ours. avg in to give both teams the same amount of throws and guess what, philly beats them out (2685) and probably ties the same amount of TDs.
as for the rushing, you did not for some reason (i can only assume that that was to try to prove your point), you did not add Buckhalter. Booker was used only in cleanup roles. So you take out Booker because he was the lowest and you add in Buckhalter and you have Dallas winning that but at a lot slimmer margin in yards and by only 1 TD. Also Choice had more carries than buckhalter did along with barber having more carries than westbrook. Now if you would like, I could make an entire spread sheet on everything down to the exact average of what each player did. or we can understand each other for our opinions and look at what has occured.

here are the facts for it.. 1. dallas was said to have the best defense in the league when wade took over. stats do not prove it nor even back that assumption up save for sacks. 2. dallas only did a little better than '07. 3. dallas offense did not place in the top ten even with all the better talent than what both philly and giants boasted. 4. injuries hampered both philly and dallas. dallas wr's were relatively healthy all season while philly did not get back its original starters till almost half way through the season. injuries kept wesbrook hampered all season since his injury in training camp and had no FB like dallas has much less a run blocking line. 5. you can toss out the felix jones assessment since he played the same amount or greater time than all our backups. 6. witten was tossed the ball almost 3 1/2 times more than celek and celek only started in the second half of the year when lj smith finally went down with injuries for almost good. 7. despite only playing with 2's and 3's for the wr corps, philly broke its franchise passing record for avg, yds and came second for td's (and that actually says something due to philly having some of the better recieving/passing records in the nfl books overall. not best, some of the better). dallas had a legit number one and two number 2's.

overall breakdown for you to understand- dallas on paper and with talent had the better team and one of the best in the league. philly outplayed and had it not been for rookie mistakes (i cannot believe that demps screwed up on that 80yd pass protection on TO in the first meeting and his screw up by muffing that kickoff turning the ball over to dallas), philly would have actually won both games.

now with that said, do you want to continue this discussion with which odds show we can go on with this for another 5 weeks? or shall we agree to disagree and continue on with the laughing at noobs and correcting other peoples mistakes/ educating those who do not understand? i would hope the latter due to just plain tired of schooling about 300+ people on an NFL forum for them not taking into account the whole picture instead of just their teams.

lol

well anyways, hope we can bury that hatchet instead of being at eachothers throats here.

vegito61283


Austin Shipp

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 7:51 pm


I did not add buckhalter because he is no longer with the team, just like i did not add T.O., i could say the same thing you did if i added T.O with what you said with Buckhalter. and with the what ifs with demps, lets say week 17 first play ware injures mcnabb dallas could have won, when i assess both teams i see if westbrook gets hurt they are screwed if McCoy doesent pan out, if McNabb gets hurt then the eagles are screwed. Dallas has 2 starting caliber RB in Barber and Choice and an excellent scat-back in Jones, they have Romo and now Jon Kitna, he aint nothin special but he can win games. so Philly is more vunerable to injury than dallas. cant wait till LP finally logs on and chimes in about the giants so we can have a 3 headed NFC east Massacre also dallas doesent run with a fb often they moslty do 2 TE, and i actually enjoy aguments like these cause when im right its fun and when im wrong i learn new things thus further expanding my NFL knowlege
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 12:23 am


Sorry to interrupt a perfectly good argument with a new post (heh), but I guess it's time to put in .02 cents.

Parity in the NFL makes preseason speculation impossible. Case in point: the Arizona Cardinals were in the Super Bowl. And ALMOST WON. biggrin

But since NFL fans have nothing better to do (well, football-wise) this time of year, why not take a shot? Here are some teams:

Atlanta Falcons: This is the trendy sleeper pick, to the point where it's not really a sleeper pick anymore. The Falcons are one of the teams I follow (behind my Bills, who will not be on this list smile ), and since I live in the Atlanta area, they were on my TV every week. So I have a pretty good idea of what they're all about. I don't see them taking that step this year. The defense needs time. The draft was used to fill in spots, and so another year of seasoning is required. Also, Roddy "Hands Of Stone" White still can't catch... I can't believe he's now considered a star player. He's _amazing_ with the ball... when he manages to somehow fail to drop it. I feel that they'll end up 9-7 or so, possibly grab a wild-card again.

New Jersey Giants: I expect them to stay in the hunt. This is a team with discipline and a good (football) mindset. Plax can be replaced... they did well not to reach for Braylon "Hands Of Jello" Edwards.

Philadelphia Eagles: This team is one move away from taking that last step. Unfortunately, that move involves someone taking offensive play-calling away from Andy "Allergic To Rushing" Reid. Reid is a tremendous talent evaluator, and his much-maligned benching of McNabb last year turned out to be a very good motivational maneuver. But his play-calling is execrable. The Eagles have the talent to win it all, but until that offense becomes versatile, it won't happen.

Minnesota Vikings: Give them a quarterback with a pulse, and they'll win their division with ease. Give them a quarterback with talent, and they'll become a threat to win it all. Sage Rosenfeld is not the answer. The Vikings front office is probably already looking ahead to next year... to see if they can land one of the many prospects in the loaded QB class of '10, or a good free agent, or anything...

Arizona Cardinals: Can anybody give me a good reason why not? The NFC West is not significantly tougher. Warner is still ace, and Fitzgerald is still a monster. Boldin... was unhappy THIS year, so it's not like there's a downturn there. They didn't lose anyone they cannot replace. And folks, that playoff run was not a fluke; that's what happens when this team gets playing the way they were built to. I don't foresee a repeat Super Bowl appearance, but it IS possible.

New England Patriots: I hate them. But you know, losers don't typically engender hate. The Patriots will contend for as long as Belicheck is coaching them. Their biggest obstacle is that success has turned them away from their original mold; they're a superstar-driven team now. Still, those are some pretty good superstars...

Miami Dolphins: I hate them more than the Patriots, but that's my inner Bills fan talking. Also, the Wildcat offense is named for a high school that is a rival to my old high school. Nonetheless, this team bears the Parcells stamp... not a superstar-driven team, but a group of team-driven players. That is a proven recipe for success.

Pittsburgh Steelers: The Steelers will contend... well, probably forever. This is the model for how all sports franchises should be run. A repeat is well within the realm of possibility; they've lost practically nothing, which is highly unusual for a Pittsburgh Steelers offseason. And James Harrison is still mean and surly, which is a good sign that complacency is no issue.

Baltimore Ravens: Speaking of mean and surly, the Ravens will be even more so than usual. The Steelers embarrassed them in every concievable way last year, but this group of people will use that to motivate and drive them. They will once again be in the mix at the end.

Jacksonville Jaguars: Whenever the Jaguars get counted out, they always seem to creep back into the playoff mix. Just saying...

Indianapolis Colts: So long as Peyton Manning is taking the snaps, this team has a chance. He's still the most talented quarterback in the NFL. All the signs point to a decline, though. They belong in the discussion, but I'm thinking this is a down year. Probably for the entire AFC South.

Tennesee Titans: The loss of Albert Haynesworth portends a fall back to the pack for the Titans. This may not be a bad thing. The team they have is plenty capable of pulling off some surprises when nobody sees them coming. I suspect that they will win their division again, but not quite with the dominance of this past season.

San Diego Chargers: This is it. The window shuts after this season. They have to know that. We will see what desperation does to this team, which has been its own worst enemy for years now. The AFC West is theirs to lose after the departure of Jay Cutler... can they become the Arizona of 2010? We shall see.

Picking a Super Bowl is almost like picking Lotto numbers. But more fun, so here goes:
I will pick a Ravens-Giants Super Bowl, which will be muuuuch closer than the last Ravens-Giants Super Bowl. But ultimately, the same end result. Ravens 27, Giants 19

Practisite


vegito61283

PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 7:57 am


Austin Shipp
I did not add buckhalter because he is no longer with the team, just like i did not add T.O., i could say the same thing you did if i added T.O with what you said with Buckhalter. and with the what ifs with demps, lets say week 17 first play ware injures mcnabb dallas could have won, when i assess both teams i see if westbrook gets hurt they are screwed if McCoy doesent pan out, if McNabb gets hurt then the eagles are screwed. Dallas has 2 starting caliber RB in Barber and Choice and an excellent scat-back in Jones, they have Romo and now Jon Kitna, he aint nothin special but he can win games. so Philly is more vunerable to injury than dallas. cant wait till LP finally logs on and chimes in about the giants so we can have a 3 headed NFC east Massacre also dallas doesent run with a fb often they moslty do 2 TE, and i actually enjoy aguments like these cause when im right its fun and when im wrong i learn new things thus further expanding my NFL knowlege


actually the one thing that has been shown time in and time out is that when mcnabb goes down they are good enough to still play anyone in the league. AJ Feeley, Jeff Garcia, Tom McMahon just had so very little to work with since basically all but a handfull of starters were injured. They dont have to worry about that. Now if I wanted to take TO's stats into account here you go.

297rec 3684yds =dallas
291rec 3331yds =eagles

will not argue tds. i have no issue with giving you the lead in recieving td's.

now you take that for the recieving, you have still a close matchup when you decide to take into account the difference of yardage from having an all-pro wide reciever who will be going into the hall of fame compared to a team that had to rely on a rookie and career backups for the first half of the season and then backups, rookie and one legit number 2 who was coming back from surgery the second half of the season and only his second season with this team. that when taken into account is something that is severly impressive and even more-so when you look that they were one of the better recieving teams in the nfl. dallas has weapons out the wazzoo just like philly and giants. giants do not have as many this year, but still are very dangerous. philly will have healthy wr's for the first time in a long time and they will have a year more experience and acclimation to the nfl. dallas does not have anything to really boast save for a committee approach for their wr's now and their rb's healthy. oh yeah, dont forget to mention that the only healthy rb that had more than a year experience was injured the whole season while playing and missing 2-4 games. now with philly giving all 4 of their rb's rushing attempts and dallas only giving 3 and then 2, you have to take into account they will have fewer attempts and with a superior rush blocking line, better yardage. it was said many many times throughout the season last year that philly had almost no rush blocking and the rb's had to make their yardage. dallas really did not need to do that. like i said, we can keep going at this.

last year save for felix jones going down with an injury (and that is why i said he is so-so because he will have to have 2 years of rehab in order to be back, year and a half if he is lucky). then you have to understand that he will have to come back mentally as well and that part has ruined so many would be great careers. he was doing very well last year, but when you take into account that he had more rushing attempts that half of philly's rb's and even the fb's then that also tells you that he was a good rookie, but may not have been as effective as well behind a line that was one of the most well rounded int he league.

man, i am getting lost in lecture. have to stop. LMFAO. i await your counter argument.
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:05 pm


hope steelers or patriots will win

Aquj-5


MXS09

PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:39 pm


Chicago Bears, Because they got Jay Cutler!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:30 pm


I'll try not to be biased...


Its either the the Patriots or the Steelers.

The Patriots even though i dispise them are a great team.

And the steelers have all they need right now to win it again. But i based on the comback from the last time we won a superbowl, chances arent high. Looking clearly at the team though. They have a shot.

mandada


Ice Cold Panther

PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:50 pm


IF THE PATS OR STEELERS WIN, I REALLY WILL START LIKE GOIN OF A BRIDGE!
IT PISSES ME OFF THAT PEOPLE WOULD WANT NE OR PITTSBURG TO WIN WHEN THEY ARE TEAMS THAT HAVEN'T EVEN WON THEIR FIRST SUPER BOWL YET.
I want to say that the super bowl will be:

SUPERBOWL 44
PANTHERS VS. CHARGERS

WINNER CAROLINA PANTHERS
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:39 am


REDSKINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kishin Crona


DGDT4TT00

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:41 pm


New England!!!!!!!
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:54 pm


Patriots. If Brady is 100%

KrispyChicken


vegito61283

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:38 pm


It will be _____________.

SUCKA!!!!!!
Reply
The NFL Guild

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum