|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:25 am
Well, I suppose I'll be first to name names then.
Knowing Primmy, I think she will not have bugged pirate or berserker because she likes to forget about Dart, Geese and Geitz. I don't think she would've done soldier because there isn't really a playable one. The FE4 Mages are almost certainly safe, picking one of them is a good shout.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:19 pm
Hmmm.... I say:
Duke Knight from FE4: Mounted Paladins that only use lances.
Bow Armour (FE4, maybe FE10): It's so pointlessly obscure that it won't be bugged.
Forrest from FE4: A sturdier Swordmaster, I guess the progenitor to the Hero? But they never used axes...
Dark Dragon Idoun from FE6. Unique class all her own.
Barons from FE4: Essentially enemy-only General-Like units that could use almost any weapon.
FE4 Ballistae Units. They were their own... unit thing. Couldn't dismount or anything, and weren't particularly hard to kill.
Primmy, do classes overlap? Like an old school class that's essentially the same as another class from later on being counted as the same, or are they still different?
@Card Queen: Geitz is a Warrior, not a Pirate/Berserker.
Playable soldiers are in the later console versions, the ones in Tellius. For example, there's Aran, Nephenee, Devdan, Jarod, and Levail. :3
FE4 Mages might be lumped in with the oh-so-common mainstream Mage, since they were consolidated for FE9, but then separated for FE10. XP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Whether she's right about Geitz or not, she seems pretty credible... And I would think classes ovrelap.
Pirate and berserker seem pretty safe to me, then, and what's this about obscure classes? FE4 mages and FE7 mages seem just about as different as the two screens on a DS. So either way, mages is up. And they aren't seen too often, so it might go with Nils' suggestion for unique classes, unless I'm missing something... (I've always recognized shamans and monks over mages.)
Dancers are also unique, as well as Lords... And brigands, seeing as you never get one. Maybe assassins too?
(Total adding to suggestion pot: Pirate, berserker, Mages, Dancers, Lord, Brigands, Assassins.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:26 pm
*raises hand* You get a Brigand in FE6. Gonzales. He's fugly, he's got bad grammar, and he promotes into a Berserker. :3
Whatcha mean by obscure classes? I meant, like, those classes from the old school games that only got used, like, once, like the Duke Knight, Baron, MageFighter, and so on. :3
So is this what we've got, what overall?
Pirate, Berserker, Soldier, Mage (multiple types), Dancer, Lord, Brigand, Assassin, Duke Knight, Bow Armor, Forrest, Dark Dragon, Baron, Ballistae, and MageFighter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 7:11 am
Got any your feel confident in, Rei?
I like pirate, berserker and bow armour.
Also, I don't know if Ballistae would count. confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:14 am
I'm going to agree that FE4 classes are almost certainly safe. I don't even know all those classes, though...
How about final bosses? Do you think she would think so far as to choose Fire Dragon to be bugged? I highly doubt it. Is that even an option?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:56 pm
Rath, in case you wanna check, FEP has a list of the FE4 classes here. Well, I nominated Dark Dragon, so Fire Dragon is plausible. Although, he might be synonymous with Mamkutes from FE6. Why don't we just pick Berserker, instead of both it and Pirate? A little more variety never hurt. XP Oh, and FE4 Ballistae users were bound to the Ballistae, and FE11 has the Shooter class, which uses Ballistae. :3 I pick MageFighter, but I feel confident with pretty much anything from FE4. XD So we've got Bow Armour, Pirate or Berserker, Mage Fighter, and 3 others? For the other spots, I nominate... Old School Shaman. Extremely rare class (first tier) that used Light Magic and Staves, and was thoroughly awesome. But, you couldn't get Light Tomes at first, so they weren't too hax. :3 Also, I nominate Bow Knight, either FE9/10 or FE4. in FE4, they were promoted ArchKnights, and could only use Bows. And we all know what they can do in FE9/10. So the sure ones: Bow Armour, Pirate/Berserker/Both. Nominated: MageFighter, Olde Shaman, Bow Knight, Final Bosses, Soldiers, Mages, Dancers, Lords, Brigands, Assassins, Duke Knights, Forrests, and Barons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:04 pm
I'm pretty sure that the old shaman and what we know as a shaman will be considered the same. Given their uniqueness, I think the shaman class is a little more likely to be bugged then the others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:01 am
Oh, cool. xp
I'm not too familiar with 4 or 11 so I apologise.
Berserker is the levelled-up Pirate, isn't it? Damn, I'm rusty. I thought that was Batre/Dorcas's levelled-up class. Is that Warrior or something?
I also agree with Rath about the Shamans. I don't think Primmy will let us get away with that! crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 1:48 pm
Hmm... Good list, needs to be condensed, but I like it...
Lord seems too broad. How about Knight Lord?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:27 pm
Card Queen Oh, cool. xp I'm not too familiar with 4 or 11 so I apologise. Berserker is the levelled-up Pirate, isn't it? Damn, I'm rusty. I thought that was Batre/Dorcas's levelled-up class. Is that Warrior or something? I also agree with Rath about the Shamans. I don't think Primmy will let us get away with that! crying
I agree with Zelym. Lord is broad, and since it's a main character thing, it's probably bugged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:08 pm
Lord is broad so I think we should think a pacific class for lord (i.e: Knight lord). Definitely keep dancer though mainly because of their abilities of support. I'm not to sure about magic users really for the reason that they can be very genetic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:25 pm
But, Lords are different. Marth is different from Sigurd, who is different from Roy, who is different from Ike. Wouldn't we be able to just say 'Lord,' and then maybe pick one at the end? But, like, since it's SO broad, it'd be like saying 'Magic User' or 'Swordfighter.' Tons of possibilities, but there are minor differences and stuff.
So the sure ones: Bow Armour, Pirate, Warrior, Lord(of some kind TBD), Soldier, Magefighter.
Nominated: Final Bosses, Dancers, Assassins, Duke Knights, Forrests, and Barons.
I added Magefighter and Soldier because they're almost definitely not bugged, and nobody objected to them prior.
Anyone wanna change anything, or does this satisfy all of us? :O
Edit~ Oh, and Primmy, whatcha want us to do about the people who haven't came in and posted at all yet? I think there's gotta be at least one... >_<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:37 am
Just thinking, if you guys are going to use dancers, you might as well consider bard because that seems equally as obscure...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:09 am
I'm not exactly sure when we all agreed to these choices. Soldier is a very common unit, and I think it could be bugged. The lord class in general is too broad and could be bugged. We need to choose one of the special lord classes. It feels like we're kind of being pushed into agreeing with these classes...
We haven't even considered FE10 classes yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
