|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:56 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Either way hes a ******** class="clear"> he was a good musician, talented actor, and a whole lot better than tom cruise (who, unfortunately, is still alive) I agree but that really doesn't change the fact. all i'm saying is if you're gonna hate a scientologist, hate tom cruise. he's more worthy of your contempt I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Yes, because one man can move a huge bolder, or rise from the dead and there really are talking bushes. rolleyes Then what is christian science.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:47 pm
Celtic guardian91 MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I agree but that really doesn't change the fact. all i'm saying is if you're gonna hate a scientologist, hate tom cruise. he's more worthy of your contempt I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Explain if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:51 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I agree but that really doesn't change the fact. all i'm saying is if you're gonna hate a scientologist, hate tom cruise. he's more worthy of your contempt I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Yes, because one man can move a huge bolder, or rise from the dead and there really are talking bushes. rolleyes Then what is christian science. havent you ever heard the term "science" applied to something that isnt physics/bio/chem/etc? you've never heard someone say, for example, "he's so good at [something] that he's turned the process into a science"? from my understanding, christian science is pretty similar - they have analyzed what it means to be a christian much as a biologist might analyze an organism beneath the microscope, and have based their beliefs on what they have determined based on their observations and conclusions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:12 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I agree but that really doesn't change the fact. all i'm saying is if you're gonna hate a scientologist, hate tom cruise. he's more worthy of your contempt I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Yes, because one man can move a huge bolder, or rise from the dead and there really are talking bushes. rolleyes Then what is christian science. havent you ever heard the term "science" applied to something that isnt physics/bio/chem/etc? you've never heard someone say, for example, "he's so good at [something] that he's turned the process into a science"? from my understanding, christian science is pretty similar - they have analyzed what it means to be a christian much as a biologist might analyze an organism beneath the microscope, and have based their beliefs on what they have determined based on their observations and conclusions. That sounds like it would be full of know-it-all jackasses...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:17 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Yes, because one man can move a huge bolder, or rise from the dead and there really are talking bushes. rolleyes Then what is christian science. havent you ever heard the term "science" applied to something that isnt physics/bio/chem/etc? you've never heard someone say, for example, "he's so good at [something] that he's turned the process into a science"? from my understanding, christian science is pretty similar - they have analyzed what it means to be a christian much as a biologist might analyze an organism beneath the microscope, and have based their beliefs on what they have determined based on their observations and conclusions. That sounds like it would be full of know-it-all jackasses... i find that most religions have their share of know it all jackasses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:26 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Yes, because one man can move a huge bolder, or rise from the dead and there really are talking bushes. rolleyes Then what is christian science. havent you ever heard the term "science" applied to something that isnt physics/bio/chem/etc? you've never heard someone say, for example, "he's so good at [something] that he's turned the process into a science"? from my understanding, christian science is pretty similar - they have analyzed what it means to be a christian much as a biologist might analyze an organism beneath the microscope, and have based their beliefs on what they have determined based on their observations and conclusions. That sounds like it would be full of know-it-all jackasses... i find that most religions have their share of know it all jackasses. Good point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:27 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Yes, because one man can move a huge bolder, or rise from the dead and there really are talking bushes. rolleyes Then what is christian science. havent you ever heard the term "science" applied to something that isnt physics/bio/chem/etc? you've never heard someone say, for example, "he's so good at [something] that he's turned the process into a science"? from my understanding, christian science is pretty similar - they have analyzed what it means to be a christian much as a biologist might analyze an organism beneath the microscope, and have based their beliefs on what they have determined based on their observations and conclusions. That sounds like it would be full of know-it-all jackasses... i find that most religions have their share of know it all jackasses. Good point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:43 am
MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I agree but that really doesn't change the fact. all i'm saying is if you're gonna hate a scientologist, hate tom cruise. he's more worthy of your contempt I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Explain if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't. Yeah I see what you mean
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:44 am
MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I agree but that really doesn't change the fact. all i'm saying is if you're gonna hate a scientologist, hate tom cruise. he's more worthy of your contempt I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Explain if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't. I disagree on this one, Mega. PM me if you're interested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:01 pm
Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Explain if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't. I disagree on this one, Mega. PM me if you're interested. i expected that. after all, you are a christian, and thus do have to believe that he could and did rise from the dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:08 pm
MegaTherion777 Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence I do hate him, and all the other ones aswell. talk2hand One thing I don't understand is "Christian Science", I mean, how the hell is that possible, Christianity and Science are about the complete oposite things... 1) christian science is not science. 2) christianity and science are not completely incompatible. Explain if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't. I disagree on this one, Mega. PM me if you're interested. i expected that. after all, you are a christian, and thus do have to believe that he could and did rise from the dead. Yup, but I have something cool I could tell you. I am just not in the mood for a great discussion with everyone else, so just PM me if you're interested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:26 pm
Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't. I disagree on this one, Mega. PM me if you're interested. i expected that. after all, you are a christian, and thus do have to believe that he could and did rise from the dead. Yup, but I have something cool I could tell you. I am just not in the mood for a great discussion with everyone else, so just PM me if you're interested. Start a thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:37 am
Gravechylde Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't. I disagree on this one, Mega. PM me if you're interested. i expected that. after all, you are a christian, and thus do have to believe that he could and did rise from the dead. Yup, but I have something cool I could tell you. I am just not in the mood for a great discussion with everyone else, so just PM me if you're interested. Start a thread. grave, i think you missed the point of me PMing him, so i have emboldened it for you xp cruor: send me what you have, i'll consider it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:44 am
Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 Divinus Cruor MegaTherion777 if you regard the fantastical stories as allegories, metaphors, symbolic tales with morals then chrisitianity is completely compatible. there was a man named jesus. science can neither prove nor disprove his divinity. science can neither prove nor disprove god. no, burning bushes don't talk, but buddha also could not have meditated for years under the bodhi tree without food, water, or sleep. these things are mythological exaggerations, they are symbolic. of course, to be a christian you DO have to believe jesus returned from the dead, which is impossible, but that's why i said it wasnt COMPLETELY incompatible. there are still some aspects of christianity that aren't. I disagree on this one, Mega. PM me if you're interested. i expected that. after all, you are a christian, and thus do have to believe that he could and did rise from the dead. Yup, but I have something cool I could tell you. I am just not in the mood for a great discussion with everyone else, so just PM me if you're interested. I wanna know! gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:33 pm
MegaTherion777 grave, i think you missed the point of me PMing him, so i have emboldened it for you xp No, I just thought it would be an interesting topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
