|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:23 am
Teh Emo Squirrel EDIT:And what about forming a GGE gun show? I'll need to work out a bit first, but okay.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:54 pm
Fresnel Teh Emo Squirrel EDIT:And what about forming a GGE gun show? I'll need to work out a bit first, but okay. ... yeah I think I'll need to work out too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:57 pm
Fresnel Hmm... No XBox here. I might be able to play... does anybody know if the Atari 5200 can be networked? I could totally kick your asses at Pac-Man. xd You can get an Xbox and buy Pacman off the XBL Marketplace->Arcade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:01 pm
As of today. i have a 360! Moddes else with supers fans ((they even have a switch!)) and a nice painted body, pics soon ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:34 pm
GAMERTAG IS NEW ::: KRILLIAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:02 pm
Well, I was playing CoD5 with Thdark/Karabiner 98 and he got 34 kills and 0 deaths. That's good even if you're a tank whore!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 4:44 am
Yeah that's pretty leetskeet.
There's a guy that frequents the same COD:UO servers that I go to, his name is Landser, he's pretty leetskeet as well. Only uses the K98.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:09 am
I used to play MoH: Spearhead quite a bit, and one time I ran into a guy name Hans on a sniper-only server. The map was divided, so anyone crossing the river was declared 'suicide' and auto-killed by the server, and snipers lined the buildings on either side. Hans had been playing for one hour and was 64-0. Everyone knew where he was, nobody could hit him. Pretty much everyone on the server vouched that he wasn't cheating, and he'd been playing since the game came out. That was bloody impressive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:50 am
SBBuckner SBBuckner Halo 3 is all I have and at the moment I don't have gold....hopefully i could get some new games (it pains me to say this, but Halo is starting to bore me) and gold if only for a month. Mabye we could all get Rock Band and start the GGE band... I CALL GUITAR!!!If you can play this s**t online and on PC I call mic. uryu ishida I only have a PS2. And i isn't even connected to the internet. Well I only have a PS1 and I got it like 2 years after they stopped making PS1 games. Requiem6661 I have two accounts (one on my friend's 360 and one on by brother's), but I don't do Xbox Live. It's infested with pre-teens who have nothing better to do than blow each other up, all while throwing around really bad c**k insults and "yo mamma" jokes. That, and I suck at Halo 3. Yeah that kind of s**t is what turned me off from online multiplayer. I played Delta Force 2 online, but every game had at least one s**t head glitching. When you put 20 rounds from an M249 into someones skull before they knife you and continue on you know they're doing something less than honest. (for those who haven't played the delta force series there is not health % meter. A headshot is instant death and like 2 or 3 torso shots will be fatal). Aside from people using hacking programs there were too many noobs with the whole internet tough guy persona. Thdark Karabiner 98
Isn't it surprising it's not Thdark or something? very Considering how I have no job I can't buy my own game system. All the new games require better and better machines and my "new" computer will only have a 2.2 ghz processor. I probably wouldn't be able to play online with you guys anytime soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:17 pm
Desert_Fox_Rommel my "new" computer will only have a 2.2 ghz processor. Haha, you say 'only'. Sometimes I wonder why Mac hasn't hit the ~4GHz range with PC processors yet. There HAS to be a good reason, I just don't know it. The only one anywhere near that range is the Mac Pro, which has an option to put in two quad-core processors, and STILL tops out at 3.2GHz. You'd think an octo-core machine would be better than that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:47 am
Fresnel Desert_Fox_Rommel my "new" computer will only have a 2.2 ghz processor. Haha, you say 'only'. Sometimes I wonder why Mac hasn't hit the ~4GHz range with PC processors yet. There HAS to be a good reason, I just don't know it. The only one anywhere near that range is the Mac Pro, which has an option to put in two quad-core processors, and STILL tops out at 3.2GHz. You'd think an octo-core machine would be better than that... Even with the slower processor that's... I guess, 8 processors that are sharing the load. That is if all of them are being used. I know there's a reason why Macs don't use good processors, and it's probably beyond that of, 'Macs suck, PCs ftw'. They're by tradition, non-gamer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:51 am
Barru Fresnel Desert_Fox_Rommel my "new" computer will only have a 2.2 ghz processor. Haha, you say 'only'. Sometimes I wonder why Mac hasn't hit the ~4GHz range with PC processors yet. There HAS to be a good reason, I just don't know it. The only one anywhere near that range is the Mac Pro, which has an option to put in two quad-core processors, and STILL tops out at 3.2GHz. You'd think an octo-core machine would be better than that... Even with the slower processor that's... I guess, 8 processors that are sharing the load. That is if all of them are being used. I know there's a reason why Macs don't use good processors, and it's probably beyond that of, 'Macs suck, PCs ftw'. They're by tradition, non-gamer? See, even if that was true though, they'd still use at LEAST a 3ghz processor, simply because there's no reason to go smaller. I think it has something to do with the physical building of the Mac processor that gigahertz are measured differently or something. I really just don't know, and I don't think I'd understand if someone told me unless I had a degree in EE-micro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:04 pm
Fresnel Barru Fresnel Desert_Fox_Rommel my "new" computer will only have a 2.2 ghz processor. Haha, you say 'only'. Sometimes I wonder why Mac hasn't hit the ~4GHz range with PC processors yet. There HAS to be a good reason, I just don't know it. The only one anywhere near that range is the Mac Pro, which has an option to put in two quad-core processors, and STILL tops out at 3.2GHz. You'd think an octo-core machine would be better than that... Even with the slower processor that's... I guess, 8 processors that are sharing the load. That is if all of them are being used. I know there's a reason why Macs don't use good processors, and it's probably beyond that of, 'Macs suck, PCs ftw'. They're by tradition, non-gamer? See, even if that was true though, they'd still use at LEAST a 3ghz processor, simply because there's no reason to go smaller. I think it has something to do with the physical building of the Mac processor that gigahertz are measured differently or something. I really just don't know, and I don't think I'd understand if someone told me unless I had a degree in EE-micro. I don't believe it's because of how it's measured. The only big difference that was between Macs and PCs was that the one read Little-Endian and the other Big-Endian. Which for a while made software and OSs incompatible with the two. But now that they're conforming and using, well, a more established system, you're able to find Macs with Windows XP or Vista. I just don't see a whole lot of gamers using Macs and that may partly be why they're not giving out Macs with high end processors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
