|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:36 am
Dragons are said to be extremely intelligent creatures, so I don't think their intellect is the issue. To begin with, I think one needs to dwell on a species' state of mind and biological properties. It's a confusing issue and it's one that I feel I understand in my mind but can't quite put into words.
Regarding half human half lion creatures, it's silly in my opinion. It's the same with centaurs, it's the same with all creatures that are part human/elf (or another race) and half animal. You will find sick and twisted individuals that enjoy doing very wrong things with animals, but no-one's mated with a dog and produced ANY kind of offspring let alone something that's half human and half canine. Same with cats of any kind, horses, or any other kind of animal. The blood, DNA, sperm and sexual organs of such creatures are completely incompatible and it's simply disgusting that the thought should ever occur. If the species was already like that, then that's something different so long as the species only mated with those of its own kind.
The vampire issue relates to demons, which is a much more complex issue.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:52 pm
I see yer point but I wasn't thinking about a true crossbreed between a human and a lion, that would be disturbing... I was thinking more along the lines of what some people do in certain stories, by this I mean genetic modifications. Do you know what I mean? I've heard and seen about characters modifying their bodies so they can look more like animals. But that's not all, if they go through with it they also can gain some of the characteristics of the animal they change into. For example, if they look like a bull or an ox, they become very strong. If they look like a rabbit, they become quick footed and so on. I was wondering if a Lion looking person would be a cool idea or not so much.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:16 am
I could understand a half lion-half man but only in some instinces. For example if it were not the result of mating but of magic. Say a wizard or druid working with magic related to animals and transmutations were to cast some kind of spell(or curse) upon a human(or elf),permanently changing it's biological form to something between the two species. Still kindof an odd idea and I don't think the to bodies would be able to function properly in terms of organs and whatnot, so the half human half whatever would most likely have a very short lifespan before it body failed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:41 am
That I can understand and agree to. It's done in Fullmetal Alchemist. People have been crossed with animals to create chimeras.
You'd need to watch the series (it's rather...gruesome in places) to understand how it's done. It's called transmutation and it's a form of alchemy in that world.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:58 pm
Yeah, the shows I've seen that have something related to this are: Batman Beyond (AKA: Batman of tomorrow) Heat Guy J There have to be a few others but I only remember those right now. I've also seen all the episodes of FMA. At least, up until the episode where it seems like the brothers end up being apart and wanting to reunite. I've heard there's a new season in the works too and I can't wait to watch it. I figured that if a being looked like a combination of lion and man, it could be best done by merely modifying the outside more than the inside, that way there wouldn't be much problem trying to get incompatible organs together as Drizzt put it. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:45 pm
Actually I have seen quite a few episodes of full metal alchemist, it's kindof what I had in mind when I was talking about transmutation razz . mhm altering the outside would take away the whole bioligical function problem, I guess I was just thinking of the FMA way of combining humans and animals sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:58 pm
Many half-human creatures, like centaurs and merfolk, exist in fantasy. I don't know if they were supposed to have resulted from the actual mating of humans with horses or fish or the like. Rather I think they are considered their own species. Ancient people didn't have our modern understanding ob biology, so who knows what they were thinking when they came up with this stuff. I agree with Mel that the thought is disturbing. I was watchin one of my favorite anime series, The Slayers, with a friend once. There was a character that was half wolfman half troll. My friend turned to me and made some remark, I can't remember what exactly, about the trolls getting it on with the wolves. I rolled my eyes. That's exactly the kind of thing its just best not to think about.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:36 am
I wasn't saying that such creatures should ever be the product of a person and something. It relates to what Drizzt was saying some time ago about "could something like this happen?"
He mentioned dragon vampires and the likes. The topic is "crossbreeds", something that is crossed with something else evidently. If centaurs and the likes are their own species, then they're effectively NOT crossbreeds.
I don't see merfolk like how they appear in The Little Mermaid. I see them very differently.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:39 pm
Right! Mel has a good point there. But I ask, wasn't there a point where a species in particular was just a crossbreed of two separate species? I mean, after a while of breeding specific kinds of dogs, we now have lots more, don't we? I'm just using this as an example, don't go nuts on me telling me that it doesn't apply or whatever; I'm just asking... sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 7:11 pm
I think this is a great idea! Cross breeding has been used in a number of popular novels, the Harry Potter series being one of them.
I see merpeople almost just like they are discribed by JKRowling. Isn't it funny how we can imagine things and then read about them, and discuss it with someone else, and have that person perciving a completely different perspective than you?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:21 am
Here are a few perceptions of merfolk... The picture to the left follows the more conventional image of a mermaid. If you think along the lines of The Little Mermaid, I don't agree with it. You can't speak verbally underwater, and you can't breathe air underwater. Plus, if they have human-like skin, it's really not going to work and neither is human hair to be 100% honest. That image of the mermaid LOOKS like a crossbreed.
However, take a look at the ones above. This I would say is realistic for merfolk.
DING! New topic *creates Merfolk thread.*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:04 pm
Yes Fire_Phieonix, it's both funny and cool cuz sometimes you get to see some interesting perceptions, like the ones Mel brought from Magic The Gathering. That is why it's my favorite card game (cuz they're perceptions are usually more realistic). 3nodding I'm gonna check out that thread right after this one! wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 4:19 pm
Aye there is another example of a "crossbread" doesn't that just prove that they could exist(in a fantasy setting)? Obviously they wouldn't coe from a human and a fish breading because I doubt that's physically possible, and if it were it would be disturbing on many levels... but they had to get there somehow.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 10:24 pm
hypnocrown Yes Fire_Phieonix, it's both funny and cool cuz sometimes you get to see some interesting perceptions, like the ones Mel brought from Magic The Gathering. That is why it's my favorite card game (cuz they're perceptions are usually more realistic). 3nodding I'm gonna check out that thread right after this one! wink Okay, I gotta call some shenanigans, because this is something about this sub-forum that has been bugging me ever since the Elves thread got going. Realistic according to who? They're fictional, mythical creatures that never actually existed. Real world genetics, real world biologies, real world science need not necessarily apply. That is completely and entirely up to the writer. If someone wants to write that merfolk were the product of cross-breeding, that's their creative choice. If someone wanted to write that centaurs were the result of the great kitchen god Zorgblag getting hammered, dropping his great and mighty meatcleaver of bouncing (+1) down from the heavens on to a horse and a man and being too drunk to put them back together properly, that's their (probably unpublished) choice, too. People around here seem to be arguing about these creatures as if they're real and have to have a single, uniform concept. That's something that I don't buy. There is no reason that one person's definition of elves, merfolk, centaurs, dragons, or whatever has to shoehorn into someone else's completely uniformly. And for that matter, they don't even have to exist in worlds where things work the same as they do here. For a fantasy guild, we seem to be taking a rather dim view of things like magic, of late and it kind of distresses me. Basically, I'm saying that we seem to be limiting ourselves to imagining worlds that still work like our own. And I know for a fact that the people around here have bigger imaginations than that. I've seen it. It was one of the reasons I came to this guild and it's one of the reasons that I participate here on a daily basis when I often don't even check most of my other guilds. Not only that, but there seems to be a lot of "agreeing to disagree" about things over which there is nothing to disagree about. Phrases are popping up like "I see them as being like this" or "you're entitled to your theory." What theory are we even talking about, here? Yours? Mine? The one sitting in a box by the door? So, consider this a challenge, I guess. Rather than arguing the scientific aspects of all these individual creatures, rather than telling each other what form they would take in your own personal pieces of fiction, how about discussing the underlying ideas. What is a crossbreed, conceptually? Is it something that bridges two worlds? Or is it something that exists partially in two worlds? Perhaps it is something that exists in those strange in-between places where both worlds exist. Why are the common things common? Why are the uncommon things uncommon? What are their origins in myth and where are they trending, conceptually, today? That sort of thing. Not whether or not a mermaid's skin would dry out in the air and whether she would have hair. Rant over for now. Berz.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 12:27 pm
How do you know that something doesn't exist just because you haven't seen it?
If humans had never seen dolphins, would you say they're "fictional" just because they'd been written about in myths and legends? We know dolphins exist because we've seen them, but what if we hadn't? That doesn't mean they aren't there.
We only know dinosaurs existed because their bones are scattered across the planet. But, what if no remains had been left? Or what if their remains had never been found? That doesn't mean they never existed.
People don't believe in God because they've never seen Him, yet His work is all around us. Just because He can't be seen, doesn't mean He isn't there.
Fantasy doesn't have to be "realistic". It can be as farfetched as you want and that's why it's called FANTASY. It can be whatever you want it to be, and whether or not the things we incude in fantasy exist. The possibility for such creatures exist, and therefore I treat them as real. The only one who can know whether or not these things exist or not is God, unless we somehow find a way to prove it.
I hope I cleared that point up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|