|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:37 pm
gonk ..... blaugh
Yeah sure. 10 days is enough because I want to start banning these kiddies. xd
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:40 pm
Waitwaitwait. Why do I have to be involved cry
This is too much like work xd
But yeah, whenever you say the word, I guess I'll get a PM out to them. ... Not sure what I'm supposed to PM them, but I will <_<; *hasn't been paying much attention to this thread*
|
|
|
|
|
|
RogueKazimeras Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:44 pm
Well Shazz and I have already started, and I know not about Landa. Soo whatever. Just make sure it's a reasonable time before August 27.
*can just imagine Val sending out the PM on the 26 at 11:30*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:46 pm
*would have to do that at 8 or 9 PM because of his computer curfew*
|
|
|
|
|
|
RogueKazimeras Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:47 pm
*doesn't care and is still imagining*
Edit - Arg. The stupid rule that you can't messages quickly is making me angry. I'm trying to get this done in one computer sitting!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:51 pm
What do we do if someone has their PM's disabled...?
Should we just ban them outright? Because Jello Lite isn't new, or active, and has disabled her PM's.
Edit - Weehoo!! I'm done. *dances*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RogueKazimeras Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:10 pm
What, Mass PM'ing is gone? I thought you could put commas between names and send a message to all of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:16 pm
I hope it's gone. If I found out I could have done that I would have been some pissed off. stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RogueKazimeras Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:51 pm
*pets Indy* I think it's gone, or it never existed and I'm thinking of another forum I'm on...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:40 pm
Shall I post replies I get here? Because I already have one from rytiko who will probably reapply, but does not wish to be a part of the guild at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:35 pm
I don't think anyone else is, because we are crew members and can just ban our repliers straight out. So you could either,
a) Keep an updated list here of people who do not wish to stay in the guild. Either they have replied to the PM, or have done nothing.
b) We make you a crew member, and you can ban them yourself. But you would have to take that up with 'Landa, because Indy can't promote people in that way. Indy thinks it might be a good idea, considering 4 is a nice round number of crew members to have, and Shazzy is super active and helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:45 pm
I think Shazzy would make an excellent mod. o_o She's really been on the ball lately.
Whatever that stupid saying is supposed to mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RogueKazimeras Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:19 pm
I agree. Shazzy is an excellent member ^^ 4laugh For some reason, though, I feel that our crew members are slowly outnumbering our actual members >_>;;
EDIT: Well, you all have crew member status (now) so you can edit the post with all the names on it indicating who's posted and who wants to be banned and whatnot. Easier to keep track that way 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:36 pm
ValenarrDeMirro I think Shazzy would make an excellent mod. o_o She's really been on the ball lately. Whatever that stupid saying is supposed to mean. "On the ball" is a baseball reference. If you're paying attention to what you're doing, it's as if you're paying attention to, or keeping your eyes "on the ball."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 6:05 am
The more you know. whee
Thanks for the modship. o_o
*doesn't really know what exactly to do with it*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
