|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:30 pm
The QWERTY keyboard is actually built back in the day so you alternate fingers more, thus reducing speed (and thus reducing jamming on old typewriters.) But the DVORAK keyboard is built so you type faster. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:12 pm
I never knew that. So it's just a different key placement that helps to get things going. I get it. 3nodding Got a picture?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:17 pm
Whoa. That's wild. How did you get your hands on such an interesting keyboard? Did you have to re-learn where the keys were?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:45 pm
I have always used a DVORAK keyboard. 3nodding
I get em' off the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:42 pm
Wow. That's really neat. I wonder why not everyone switches to that type of keyboard if they work to improve how fast you are with the keys. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:59 pm
Because they are used to QWERTY and are too lazy to change. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:06 pm
No, what I mean by that, is why they aren't teaching the children that are at a younger age on such a board? That would make more sense, wouldn't it? I mean, it's more logical that way, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:18 pm
Tradition. (I know it's stupid but it's true.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:17 pm
Yeah... that is quite... unrealistic if you think about it. sweatdrop Sort of like English vs. Metric. It's dumb, yet we still use it. Go figure. stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:43 am
But I always wondered.
If a yard was the length of both of the queens arms then she must have been so frigging tiny. xd
Midget queens for the win!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:41 am
Don't you know? It was fashionable to have small women as wives back in the day. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:59 pm
But still, I find it hilarious. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:32 pm
Are you making fun of THE QUEEN!? eek Oh my!
J/K, it is kind of funny. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:19 pm
Most females find it in insulting when you have to kneel down to give them a hug. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
