|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:49 pm
I was just thinkin bout this earlier. If Gaia takes 2% from what we sell, how is that suppose to decrease the inflation? Wouldn't this cause more inflation for people wantin around the normal price?
But, then again, it depends on the item xD It's only 2%
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:11 pm
★ ★ I like the setup, but the 2% thing I don't. ----------------------------------------------------------------- "How fine you look when dressed in rage. Your enemies are fortunate that your condition is not permanent. And you're lucky too: Red eyes suit so few." -- Cheshire [AM Alice] -----------------------------------------------------------------
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:13 pm
what they are expecting is that the 2% will remove gold from circulation crating an increased value of gold. It might wrok, but I say that it is not worth the hassle.
NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:10 pm
calcifer9 what they are expecting is that the 2% will remove gold from circulation crating an increased value of gold. It might wrok, but I say that it is not worth the hassle. NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION! Is it stoopid in here...
Here, here!
...or is it just me?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:56 pm
Wow uh i kinda liked the old one better :S but you never know sometimes new things are good...sometimes there not...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:44 pm
thats awsume but i bet its going to be all messed up jsut like the new look is now...or it will b very confsuing
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:37 am
i like it smile thx for the screenshot heart and idon't think it's confuzing, and the fact that you can try things on before buying it's what i was waiting for for a long time 3nodding
the only minus is the 2% thingy... xp oh well
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:49 am
thats cool we get to try before we buy, but that sucks 2%
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:51 am
That 2% is a horrible idea, why do they want to do that again????
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:34 am
ninja save your goodbyes... ninja looks a bit more complicated...O_o its not the end of the world... ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:22 am
now that i see a screenshot, i hate it! i like the old one way better
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:27 am
I like the way it looks. It looks fine to me.
The only thing that's pissing me off to no end is their ******** 2% closing fee. The admin need to take a ******** economics class really badly because they obviously don't realize that that s**t is just going to cause for more goddamned inflation. Now I'm going to have to cough up 2% more gold on every MC that's listed 15-20K every month. stressed (Sorry for the cussing, but hopefully you have a filter on...I'm just soo pissed because the marketplace is like my second home on Gaia, I spend all my times thar...)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:28 am
DumberDan calcifer9 what they are expecting is that the 2% will remove gold from circulation crating an increased value of gold. It might wrok, but I say that it is not worth the hassle. NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION! Is it stoopid in here...
Here, here!
...or is it just me? WE SHOULD DUMP THEIR COFFEE! D<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|