|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:09 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:10 am
For those too lazy to go look it up, this is the rubric they have posted in the "Rules" section Quote: Point System: Fighter can gain up to 5 points in each category. Spelling/ GrammarPunctuation, spelling, right word usages. Conciseness/ Writing AbilityDoes the writer have a good grasp on making the details clear to the reader? How good is the writer at in creating an effective and/or interesting writing scheme, in addition to augmenting their clarity? RoleplayingDoes the writer stick to their character's personality and overall "feel?" If a fighter is a stubborn fool, then the posts should show this. Dialogue and mood setting can also can attribute to this. Creativity/ StrategyUnique plans or good strategies that make use of the fighter's situation, setting, and ability are examined. If they have both, even better. Control of the FightHow well was the fighter dominating the fight?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:11 am
lawlzorz.
I bought homework from you one time, you cheated me...the I got a zero on that paper.
edit: I got 1's and 2's on my grading sheet; I felt I did horrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:15 am
*laughs* What have you been up to lately? Kay Why: Thanks for the reference. Any directions for where the judgements of fights are posted, or do those go privately to the fighters involved?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:16 am
Well, that was a surprising .4 margin.
Your fight actually had me have to really read hard for creativity and control, since up until that point, you both were dominating the other sections.
Meh... I should work on Yasuo v Gold now, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:16 am
Here is hoping I win via luck and judges decision!
-MMA joke start.-
I need Cecil Peoples and Tony Weeks, like now.
-MMA joke end.-
Edit:
Flutter:
Not much, really. Grappling stuff and being a goon, the usual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:23 am
I'm tempted to just post links to Lock and Flow to counter grappling moves.
'Cause even if you write it word for word as what the counter would logically be... there are those that think if a detail such as weight distribution isn't included in the description of the move, it gives an advantage to the opponent.
If I joint is locked, it's staying that way until a counter is made. No matter how you point your toes, or raise a pinky finger. Such misdirection of behavior to justify nullifying a valid counter.
I find that discouraging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:24 am
Political post? What political post?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:24 am
Flightless Butterfly *laughs* What have you been up to lately? Kay Why: Thanks for the reference. Any directions for where the judgements of fights are posted, or do those go privately to the fighters involved? Not sure for this tourny, in HoH they put them up publicly. But either way they do it, they said they're not revealing them till next week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:25 am
Rhoslyn Vernal Well, that was a surprising .4 margin.
Your fight actually had me have to really read hard for creativity and control, since up until that point, you both were dominating the other sections.
Meh... I should work on Yasuo v Gold now, I guess. And greaaat...now I'm gonna have to spend a week biting my nails, trying to figure out which of us came out less than half a point ahead XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:26 am
Oh, same. The government is, when taken from a profit-margin view, inefficient. It has to become leviathan-esque to be at its most efficient, and when it is, it is at its most tyrannical. Unfortunately, the smallest amount of government we need happens to be "plenty", because there's just so many areas in which we need to have regulation and representation. So, naturally, with our style government, we end up with a government that follows the Golden Rule: those with the gold, make the rules.
I think it's the exact opposite: capitalism gone mad. When you let the foxes run the henhouse, you're pretty much going to get ********. And oh yes, the corruption and misrepresentation on both sides is absolutely ******** staggeringly disgraceful. You have the center-right Democracks pretending to represent the left, the far-right Republocrats pretending to represent the right, and it's pretty much choosing which hand-puppet you want.
I tend to vote Democract when I don't vote third-party on the grounds of "I prefer to have at least a drop of lube and the campaign promise of a reach-around when I get ******** in the a**."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:27 am
Flutter: Things like hip placement, weight of the hips forward or backward and many many many many many many more things play a huge role into how certain counters to joint locks and choke works.
Lets say you don't explain how your hips are set and then lock in an Americana, yes? Without me knowing how your hips are set I can simply assume they aren't and buck my own hips, push off with my unlocked arm on your hips and literally flip you over me and end up on top of you.
Things like hips and even positions of the body make ALL the difference in grappling. Failure to explain them allows me to exploit that.
Dark Elf: Pandas?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:35 am
*starts dinging Fox and Gold tenths of a point for grammar and spelling*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
