|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:27 pm
Allegro dragn99 Allegro dragn99 Sweet Amber Lynne Allegro Going back over Dragn's posts from earlier, I'm pretty firmly convinced he's mafia. Because during the whole Ribbin v me/owwin thing, he may have voted ribbin, but he never openly debated with Ribbin like he did with me and Owwin, despite the fact that our case was rock solid and Ribbin's was weaker than an anorexic Magkiarp. I think he was TRYING to distance himself from Ribbin with the vote, but it was shoddily done. I would like to now actually switch to a proper Vote on Dragn. I am about 93% certain he's mafia, and on the off chance that he's the scientist, I'd like him gone before nightfall. i has suspicion when he was trying to distance himself from the spotlight therefore i second the vote for dragn Isn't the point of the game to distance yourself from the spot light? By spotlight, she means Ribbin. You put a vote on him, but never gave us a reason why, just said he was "suspicious." Meanwhile, you kept trying to pick holes in what Ribbin himself later told me was "one of the most solid cases" he'd ever seen in a game, trying to plant a seed of douibt. Wasn't it yours and Owwin's case I was trying to pick apart? I was referring to ours. Ribbin complimented it because it was so solid. So WHY attack it? Ribbin's was about as lame as a three legged millipede. Ah. Well, I mostly ignored Ribbin's case really. I just got suspicious of how you and Owwin were working together so well.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:29 pm
Allegro dragn99 Sweet Amber Lynne Allegro Going back over Dragn's posts from earlier, I'm pretty firmly convinced he's mafia. Because during the whole Ribbin v me/owwin thing, he may have voted ribbin, but he never openly debated with Ribbin like he did with me and Owwin, despite the fact that our case was rock solid and Ribbin's was weaker than an anorexic Magkiarp. I think he was TRYING to distance himself from Ribbin with the vote, but it was shoddily done. I would like to now actually switch to a proper Vote on Dragn. I am about 93% certain he's mafia, and on the off chance that he's the scientist, I'd like him gone before nightfall. i has suspicion when he was trying to distance himself from the spotlight therefore i second the vote for dragn Isn't the point of the game to distance yourself from the spot light? By spotlight, she means Ribbin. You put a vote on him, but never gave us a reason why, just said he was "suspicious." Meanwhile, you kept trying to pick holes in what Ribbin himself later told me was "one of the most solid cases" he'd ever seen in a game, trying to plant a seed of douibt. yes that is what i meant thanks allegro, if you had actually given a reason as to why you were choosing him instead of trying like hell to get out of the spotlight i wouldn't have thought you at all...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:29 pm
dragn99 Allegro dragn99 Allegro dragn99 Isn't the point of the game to distance yourself from the spot light? By spotlight, she means Ribbin. You put a vote on him, but never gave us a reason why, just said he was "suspicious." Meanwhile, you kept trying to pick holes in what Ribbin himself later told me was "one of the most solid cases" he'd ever seen in a game, trying to plant a seed of douibt. Wasn't it yours and Owwin's case I was trying to pick apart? I was referring to ours. Ribbin complimented it because it was so solid. So WHY attack it? Ribbin's was about as lame as a three legged millipede. Ah. Well, I mostly ignored Ribbin's case really. I just got suspicious of how you and Owwin were working together so well. So, you IGNORED someone making a weak case claiming to be one of the most, if not THE most important role in the game, and instead focused on two dudes with a rock solid case at being innocent because we were WORKING well? Protip: It's good for townies to work together.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:35 pm
Allegro dragn99 Allegro dragn99 Allegro dragn99 Isn't the point of the game to distance yourself from the spot light? By spotlight, she means Ribbin. You put a vote on him, but never gave us a reason why, just said he was "suspicious." Meanwhile, you kept trying to pick holes in what Ribbin himself later told me was "one of the most solid cases" he'd ever seen in a game, trying to plant a seed of douibt. Wasn't it yours and Owwin's case I was trying to pick apart? I was referring to ours. Ribbin complimented it because it was so solid. So WHY attack it? Ribbin's was about as lame as a three legged millipede. Ah. Well, I mostly ignored Ribbin's case really. I just got suspicious of how you and Owwin were working together so well. So, you IGNORED someone making a weak case claiming to be one of the most, if not THE most important role in the game, and instead focused on two dudes with a rock solid case at being innocent because we were WORKING well? Protip: It's good for townies to work together. I'll keep that in mind for next time >.>
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:38 pm
For tonight, I'd like our Jenny to target Wylr or, alternatively one of the other AFK players.
Joy and Sabrina will be spoken to privately.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:00 pm
there isnt alot of people online for it being the time it is..where the heck is everyone lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:02 pm
There's only six or so people that are still left right? A couple of those people haven't been active at all.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:04 pm
dragn99 There's only six or so people that are still left right? A couple of those people haven't been active at all. yes that is true they really should be more active...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:05 pm
Ruins the fun for everyone else if they're not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:09 pm
Well, they have managed to survive longer than some of the actives at any rate...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:11 pm
dragn99 Well, they have managed to survive longer than some of the actives at any rate... Any you find particularly suspicious?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:14 pm
Allegro dragn99 Well, they have managed to survive longer than some of the actives at any rate... Any you find particularly suspicious? i have a gut feeling on wylr there is not enough to make a clear case but something tells me he in with the bad guys we will have to wait and see i guess
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:17 pm
Allegro dragn99 Well, they have managed to survive longer than some of the actives at any rate... Any you find particularly suspicious? That bink guy maybe? I dunno. There's two mafia members, and two inactives. I'm already under the stern glare of the FOS, so I'm gonna be quiet.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:17 pm
dragn99 Allegro dragn99 Well, they have managed to survive longer than some of the actives at any rate... Any you find particularly suspicious? That bink guy maybe? I dunno. There's two mafia members, and two inactives. I'm already under the stern glare of the FOS, so I'm gonna be quiet. Which is pretty much a guilt admission.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:18 pm
Allegro dragn99 Allegro dragn99 Well, they have managed to survive longer than some of the actives at any rate... Any you find particularly suspicious? That bink guy maybe? I dunno. There's two mafia members, and two inactives. I'm already under the stern glare of the FOS, so I'm gonna be quiet. Which is pretty much a guilt admission. ? I always thought redirecting the FOS was a guilt admission.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|