Thanksgiving Mafia - Town Wins | Page 26 | Archives | Guild Forums

-Dessynea-
Crew

Offline

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:17 pm

For the second time!

-Dessynea-

Can you guys please start making your votes red, not just bold.

On the first page it says we won't count them if they aren't red and we have been lax about it and I am not going to change that half way into the game because that wouldn't be fair but please start making the votes red.

I don't think this is asking too much.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:24 pm

I'm here now. Economics class is boring.

Hashire Kazemeijin
Crew

Distinct Enabler

Offline

Cabron the Swan

Offline

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:25 pm

dess confirmed for bossy aunt

vote dess

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:26 pm

I'm glad someone at least decided to not ignore my suspicions of Hash. I'm sorry you were feeling ill though, hun!

But I am voting for Hash again. I'm still suspicious of both you and Ton, but I'm sticking to my guns and holding to my previous suspicions.

AniuWolfe

Offline

Hashire Kazemeijin
Crew

Distinct Enabler

Offline

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:30 pm

Allegro

On that note, I'm going to throw a vote at Hash. I still can't get a bead on you, despite you being one of the most active posters. All I hear from you is Devil's Advocacy, never anything substantial. It's classic scum tactics.

Someone define this for me.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:33 pm

"In common parlance, a devil's advocate is someone who, given a certain argument, takes a position he or she does not necessarily agree with, just for the sake of argument"

Allegro

Offline

Hashire Kazemeijin
Crew

Distinct Enabler

Offline

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:36 pm

So translating that to English, it's basically talking about the situation against Maru back then when I chose to be on the sidelines?

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:37 pm

It's just that generally, you're choosing to argue without actually making your OWN point; just trying to refute whatever's being said.

Allegro

Offline

Hashire Kazemeijin
Crew

Distinct Enabler

Offline

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:41 pm

Normally I don't have my own point. I'm an overly cautious individual who doesn't like to act without banishing all reasonable doubt. It's a character flaw I can't help.

I mean, right now I have a theory or two, but I don't have much more than circumstantial evidence to support them, and I can't bring myself to move forward on them on the chance that I may be wrong and make things worse.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:43 pm

Dude, none of us have anything but circumstantial evidence. It's not CSI.

Allegro

Offline

Cabron the Swan

Offline

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:44 pm

Hashire Kazemeijin

Normally I don't have my own point. I'm an overly cautious individual who doesn't like to act without banishing all reasonable doubt. It's a character flaw I can't help.

I mean, right now I have a theory or two, but I don't have much more than circumstantial evidence to support them, and I can't bring myself to move forward on them on the chance that I may be wrong and make things worse.

There is no way to banish all reasonable doubt. Creating more doubt just for the sake of being uncertain doesn't do the town any good. You have to take chances, make mistakes, and get messy.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:46 pm

Quarter of an hour till end of day. Roles and votes by then please.

Vote Count:
Hash: II

-Dessynea-
Crew

Offline

Hashire Kazemeijin
Crew

Distinct Enabler

Offline

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:48 pm

Alright, here's what I think then:

The Mafia didn't act yesterday, right? That suggests that either

A) They weren't around, which would mean we could look towards the people who didn't show up once yesterday.

or

B) They hit the Turkey. It's possible, but with the ideal 7(Yesterday):2:1 spread, the odds aren't too in favor of that outcome.

I suppose they COULD have just chose not to act, but I can't see any logical reasons to support that.