Homosexuality | Page 26 | Religious Debate | Guild Forums

DeathAnimeNow

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:04 am

*sigh*

Why is it that some people must equate love and sex as the same thing? You say that a homosexual male only wants to be with another guy for the pleasure in a**l sex. But that is not true. I have known plenty of happily straight guys that like a**l sex. It can be enjoyable because you are stimulating the prostate gland. It is not a 'gay' thing.

Also, love is not defined by sex. (At least not by all) You can have sex with people you don't love and you can love people you don't have sex with.

Being homosexual is not a choice. Yes, some people go through that experimental phase of just 'wanting to see what its like' but TRUE homosexuality is genetic. And you wonder how someone can be with the opposite sex then just decide they are gay, that is usually not how it happens. You would be surprised how effective people are at hiding their true selves by lying to themselves, by trying to fit in and do what they think is expected of them.

And being a mother has nothing to do with sex either. It is a love and a force all of its own that is above such things. And I am sorry to say that no man and no person who has never been a mother can understand that.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:06 am

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

Quote:

Sexuality can change in time. Do not take this for "Gays can be straight!"

That's exactly what it means... and it goes with that being gay/bi/straight is a choice.

ORLY? If I sleep with men, it doesn't mean I am heterosexual, it just means that I've chosen to sleep with him for whatever reason.

Sexuality is fluid in that it takes some people a LONG ******** time to realise what their sexuality is.

Sex =/ love

Quote:

Gay =/ infertile

But I doubt they are going to sexually reproduce... [/quotes]
Does someone need to explain to you how a baby is made?

Quote:

Except that having a child has nothing to do with your sexuality.

If a guy doesn't want to have sex with a girl, or the other way around, I doubt they are going to sexually reproduce.
You really do need a lesson in anatomy.

Quote:

What the ********? Are you saying that the SOLE PURPOSE we are on this planet is to make babies? Oh s**t, I can buy me some sperm and get the turkey baster out.

Remember, humans are essentially animals. Our sole purpose is to carry on our genes to our offspring. That is why gay couples often adopt children, because they can't have biological children. If they are bi, that is different. I'm more comfortable around bi's than gays.[/quotes]

homosexual =/ infertile. My G-d!

Quote:

What business is it of yours? How the hell can a bisexual hurt you if they sleep with you then sleep with a woman?

It would hurt me because they didn't tell me.

It's not your business. Do your partners usually come out to you as straight, or is it just assumed that they are?

In Medias Res IV

Offline

Lumanny the Space Jew

Blessed Poster

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:11 am

Vadasz Ravenari

There is nothing wrong with homosexuality, i just think that it's kind of counter-productive but in this case it's not such a bad thing. Gays don't breed and the world has more than enough humans in it as far as I'm concerned. If I do have any porblem it would be the one's that can't make up their own minds. Like the woman that decides after having a kid that she's a lesbian. That information would have been useful for the father of their child before they had a kid together, you know? I think it's wrong to tell someone that you're straight and then turn around and say that your gay 2 yrs later. It's just selfish and irrisponsable. So to all the bisexuals out there never say that you are straight or gay. someone will wind up hurt in the end and everyone deserves the truth espicially if your sleeping with them.

rofl
You f*cking idiot...

How is being born bisexual going to hurt someone's feelings?

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:29 am

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

Quote:

What business is it of yours? How the hell can a bisexual hurt you if they sleep with you then sleep with a woman?

It would hurt me because they didn't tell me.

What the hell is the difference between your girlfriend leaving you for another man, and your girlfriend leaving you for another woman?

(besides the latter being slightly more awesome / concerning biggrin )

Artto

Offline

Falsequivalence

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:44 am

A man+a man = Sexually produced child.
Nor woman+woman.
A gay person is most likely not going to sexually reproduce in their life.
Because they are gay.

Quote:

it takes some people a LONG ******** time to realise what their sexuality is.

No one I know that is gay or bi didn't realize before they went into elementrary school.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:45 am

Artto

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

Quote:

What business is it of yours? How the hell can a bisexual hurt you if they sleep with you then sleep with a woman?

It would hurt me because they didn't tell me.

What the hell is the difference between your girlfriend leaving you for another man, and your girlfriend leaving you for another woman?

(besides the latter being slightly more awesome / concerning biggrin )

It's that they didn't tell me they were bi.

Falsequivalence

Offline

brainnsoup
Crew

Dapper Shapeshifter

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:47 am

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

((I'm going to get my a** kicked by the gays))
Homosexuality is the one thing in the world that I cannot find a good reason for. The main reason is sex.
Why would a guy want a d**k rammed up his a**?
I do not understand.
And women having sex with women doesn't make sense.
The only way I can think of possible is.... odd.

Otherwise, I'm fine.
I just don't want to walk down the street and see 2 guys/girls making out in their car...

I'm sorry if I offended you. These are just my beliefs on the subject.

Some people have thought my girlfriend was lesbian, and I was gay...
I think that is odd...

I have a question for the homosexuals....
Do you think (if your gay) girls are not... well... attractive?
And do you think (If your a lesbian) that guys aren't attractive?

It seems that you are uncomfortable with public affection.
@Vadasz Ravenari: And it seems that you have a problem with people who are unfaithful.
Neither of these have to do with a person's sexuality.

Also, and this is not specific to anyone's argument, there are ways other than adoption for two men or two women to have a baby.
Two men can find a surrogate mother and two women just need sperm.
And if the purpose of love is to reproduce, should we not allow straight infertile couples to marry/be together?

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:48 am

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

A man+a man = Sexually produced child.
Nor woman+woman.
A gay person is most likely not going to sexually reproduce in their life.
Because they are gay.

Quote:

it takes some people a LONG ******** time to realise what their sexuality is.

No one I know that is gay or bi didn't realize before they went into elementrary school.

o.o They knew when they were, what, five? Damn...

brainnsoup
Crew

Dapper Shapeshifter

Offline

In Medias Res IV

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:54 pm

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

A man+a man = Sexually produced child.
Nor woman+woman.
A gay person is most likely not going to sexually reproduce in their life.
Because they are gay.

Quote:

it takes some people a LONG ******** time to realise what their sexuality is.

No one I know that is gay or bi didn't realize before they went into elementrary school.

You are what I call an ignorant child.

sex isn't the only way to have children.

holy s**t.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:24 pm

Quote:

sex isn't the only way to have children.

I'm pretty sure to SEXUALLY reproduce, you have to engage in the act of SEX. And I put SEXUALLY before reproduce EVERY TIME.
And I'm not ignorant.
I'm hard-headed.
Thank you for ignoring half of the words I type.

@Brainnsoup...
I'm not uncomfortable with public affection.
Just when it is homo.
Sorry.
Yes. They did. But to be honest, I don't know very many gay people, and all but one of them is lesbian. And I did say they most likely wouldn't sexually reproduce. I didn't say they wouldn't if they really wanted a biological child.
No, the purpose of sex is to reproduce.
I haven't found a purpose for love yet...
There can be sex without love.
But many cases of love outside of family do involve sex.

Falsequivalence

Offline

In Medias Res IV

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:40 pm

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

Quote:

sex isn't the only way to have children.

I'm pretty sure to SEXUALLY reproduce, you have to engage in the act of SEX. And I put SEXUALLY before reproduce EVERY TIME.
And I'm not ignorant.
I'm hard-headed.
Thank you for ignoring half of the words I type.

@Brainnsoup...
I'm not uncomfortable with public affection.
Just when it is homo.
Sorry.
Yes. They did. But to be honest, I don't know very many gay people, and all but one of them is lesbian. And I did say they most likely wouldn't sexually reproduce. I didn't say they wouldn't if they really wanted a biological child.
No, the purpose of sex is to reproduce.
I haven't found a purpose for love yet...
There can be sex without love.
But many cases of love outside of family do involve sex.

All I need is sperm. It is my choice as to how it fertilises my ovaries.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:42 pm

The majority of the time, gays aren't going to have biological children. It is possible, but not common. I would guess most gay couples adopt.

Falsequivalence

Offline

In Medias Res IV

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:59 pm

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

The majority of the time, gays aren't going to have biological children. It is possible, but not common. I would guess most gay couples adopt.

Why are you still talking?

You're not gay, you don't know what it's like to be gay, bugger off before you make a bigger fool of yourself.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:28 pm

I'm still talking because this is a debate. I put in what I thought, and I was attacked for it. I may be making a fool of myself, but your making an a** out of yourself.

Falsequivalence

Offline

Lumanny the Space Jew

Blessed Poster

Offline

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:48 pm

XxBroken_And_ShatteredxX

A man+a man = Sexually produced child.
Nor woman+woman.
A gay person is most likely not going to sexually reproduce in their life.
Because they are gay.

Quote:

it takes some people a LONG ******** time to realise what their sexuality is.

No one I know that is gay or bi didn't realize before they went into elementrary school.

Homosexuals can still sexually reproduce sperm dnation and surrogate mothers.

Welcome to Gaia! ::

Gaia Guilds

Debate/Discuss Religion

Quick Reply

More Information