|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:01 pm
Sorry Hairy, I just don't think Pertwee should win...
Jon Pertwee = 0 (-2)
Tom Baker = 2 (+1)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:29 pm
*sigh*
Not really a surprise, but I'm glad Pertwee made a strong showing this time. The first time we did the game he was the first one eliminated!
And, anyway, we still toasted Colin and Patrick pretty good. razz
Final Results
Round 1:
Crumpet Lord: C. Baker
Die_cucco: Troughton
Hairy Priest: Hartnell
isidar_mithram: McGann, Eccleston
Roobarb: Pertwee, Tennant
Timelady42: Davison, T. Baker
Round 2:
fredwise: McGann, C. Baker, Pertwee
isidar_mithram: Eccleston, Davison
moonlightswan: Hartnell
Roobarb: Tennant
Stresshog: McCoy
Velvetnight: Troughton
fredwise killed off three Doctors. Talk about bloodthirsty!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hairy Priest Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:58 am
Hairy Priest fredwise killed off three Doctors. Talk about bloodthirsty! I was making up for lost time, seeing as I wasn't in the Guild for the first match! I thought it was nice seeing Pertwee through to the finals as well though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:16 am
Stresshog fredwise CBDB - The Sisters Of Plentitude. They think they're doing the right thing, but many people suffer if they get their way... Well, sort of the same thing with the new Cybermen: Their upgrades were meant to get rid of human weakness, but they lost their humanity in the process and became slaves, in a way. Good idea, bad execution. Oh, and their leader was a maniac. Not sure if that can be applied here. sweatdrop Well, on the 'leader was a maniac' point...We prefer to use to word 'different' The rest of it..is COMPLETELY WRONG!!! We're not cybermen!! -for one thing, none of us is male whee But we're not cybermen. How unfair is that? The first game, I getcalled a dalek. Now, apparently my friends and I are all cybermen! Mass Grave: Well, so many died while I was studying..it's not worth it to make all those graves..Why, I haven't even had time for Colin Baker's yet! So a mass grave made sense. A mass grave with ........... on the stone..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:04 am
Alas, poor Pertwee. I didn't get to kill him this time.
Ah well maybe next time! whee I love this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:03 am
Roobarb Alas, poor Pertwee. I didn't get to kill him this time. Ah well maybe next time! whee I love this game. Sorry Roobarb. But maybe next time I'll get Troughton... twisted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:30 pm
Who beat Tennant? TROUGHTON did! Oh yeah! *dances little jig*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:54 am
WOW. Talk about being blood-thirsty..Sure this game isn't making you more violent and aggressive fredwise? blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:27 am
isidar_mithram Stresshog fredwise CBDB - The Sisters Of Plentitude. They think they're doing the right thing, but many people suffer if they get their way... Well, sort of the same thing with the new Cybermen: Their upgrades were meant to get rid of human weakness, but they lost their humanity in the process and became slaves, in a way. Good idea, bad execution. Oh, and their leader was a maniac. Not sure if that can be applied here. sweatdrop Well, on the 'leader was a maniac' point...We prefer to use to word 'different' The rest of it..is COMPLETELY WRONG!!! We're not cybermen!! -for one thing, none of us is male whee But we're not cybermen. How unfair is that? The first game, I getcalled a dalek. Now, apparently my friends and I are all cybermen! Cybermen are gender-inspecific. And I suppose you're not beings of pure logic...but oh well. It's mostly the numbers part. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:42 am
isidar_mithram WOW. Talk about being blood-thirsty..Sure this game isn't making you more violent and aggressive fredwise? blaugh Don't blame this game! Blame the Tennant haters/CBDB... The game is innocent! And I'm very nice IRL, so I need something to let my aggression out...and if McGann's in the way...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:08 am
The numbers? Four. We have four members. That's it. Everyone else.....who was in the last game drifted off. We used to be able to kill at will! (And I know they're gender inspecific. But stillll.........
I'm not about to blame myself..besides, I had a really cool tombstone planned out for Tennant..until you lot killed Colin as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hairy Priest rolled 1 6-sided dice:
4
Total: 4 (1-6)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 8:07 pm
Yeah, I remember when there was a whole army of you CBDB. I'm not sure how we managed to bump off Colin.
The next time we redo this game (not for a while, I hope... gotta let tempers cool down a bit), maybe we ought to add a random element. Like, with dice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hairy Priest Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:17 am
That'd be interesting. And you managed to knock colin off because we were all super busy. Tests, assignments, projects..whatever. The lot. And I couldn't get on at weekends. So there was always a two day gap. Same with Evarinya I suppose.
How would we do it with dice though??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:26 am
Ah, so we've got to make a concerted effort to bump off Colin on the weekends. I see...
Anyway, not sure what would be best for a dice-based game. How about each time you play, you either pick to roll a d6 to attack someone, or d4 to heal the Doctor of your choice. And then the next person would be responsible for adding or subtracting from the proper person.
Something like:
Heal Tennant.
Rolls a d4.
The next person adds the result to Tennant's current score and declares their roll. etc etc etc
I dunno, just a thought. Just something to add a bit of variation to the game, I suppose. I'm interested in hearing what other people think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hairy Priest Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:07 pm
It sounds like quite a good idea. I like the random element it adds, but then it kind of takes away part of the strategy needed...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
