|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:43 pm
YOU HAVE THREE HOURS LEFT TO VOTE.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:45 pm
Dirtay Emo Bunny Vitamin Crack I wonder what the circle of rocks part means. I looked at the avatars and thought maybe jewelery? But then I couldn't see any circles formed by that. Kaenko has like a rock sash thing around her torso.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:46 pm
Kaenko Dirtay Emo Bunny Vitamin Crack I wonder what the circle of rocks part means. I looked at the avatars and thought maybe jewelery? But then I couldn't see any circles formed by that. Kaenko has like a rock sash thing around her torso.
The brown thing could be interpreted as a rock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:58 pm
I think on all but on side means on the chart, the humans are next to the cannibal except in one place. Meaning they would have to be on the side; since if they were with another cannibal they would be 'two feasting in the background'.
I think we were right to vote of Pudding. :3 (Or whatever I'm supposed to call her.) Since shes on the edge, and most of the people around her were shown to be humans.
It means if we assume someone else is a cannibal check the people next to them. It could be them.
But then it could also mean they're humans. D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:05 pm
Ganrither I think on all but on side means on the chart, the humans are next to the cannibal except in one place. Meaning they would have to be on the side; since if they were with another cannibal they would be 'two feasting in the background'.
I think we were right to vote of Pudding. :3 (Or whatever I'm supposed to call her.) Since shes on the edge, and most of the people around her were shown to be humans.
It means if we assume someone else is a cannibal check the people next to them. It could be them.
But then it could also mean they're humans. D:
I like your idea, and I think we were right to vote off Pudding.
She was rather suspicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:07 pm
luxRAYP Ganrither I think on all but on side means on the chart, the humans are next to the cannibal except in one place. Meaning they would have to be on the side; since if they were with another cannibal they would be 'two feasting in the background'.
I think we were right to vote of Pudding. :3 (Or whatever I'm supposed to call her.) Since shes on the edge, and most of the people around her were shown to be humans.
It means if we assume someone else is a cannibal check the people next to them. It could be them.
But then it could also mean they're humans. D:
I like your idea, and I think we were right to vote off Pudding.
She was rather suspicious.I suggested Pudding! surprised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:16 pm
Zett luxRAYP Ganrither I think on all but on side means on the chart, the humans are next to the cannibal except in one place. Meaning they would have to be on the side; since if they were with another cannibal they would be 'two feasting in the background'.
I think we were right to vote of Pudding. :3 (Or whatever I'm supposed to call her.) Since shes on the edge, and most of the people around her were shown to be humans.
It means if we assume someone else is a cannibal check the people next to them. It could be them.
But then it could also mean they're humans. D:
I like your idea, and I think we were right to vote off Pudding.
She was rather suspicious.I suggested Pudding! surprised
xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:19 pm
Oh! Another thought.
The void of emotion point seems kind of like Kaliea. She has a statue avatar with no expression on her face at all.
And if you listen to the clue about 'two feasting together' that would put BDG (I know people call him by a different name, but I forget what) in serious risk or being accused.
-This may be a coincidence but she also has an X on her chest. So perhaps the XX things meant to look for two people with X's.
Seems stupid to me but might as well point that out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:19 pm
I'm not too sure about the Pudding thing. I mean she fits the criteria but why would Lyd give us a clue about a cannibal that's already been voted off?
I saw the clue and thought it meant there were four cannies left cuz it mentioned four different cannibals and the clue seemed like present tense.
I dunno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:21 pm
Because Lyd likes to mess with us? D:
I dunno, I just feel it was the right thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:23 pm
Vitamin Crack I'm not too sure about the Pudding thing. I mean she fits the criteria but why would Lyd give us a clue about a cannibal that's already been voted off? I saw the clue and thought it meant there were four cannies left cuz it mentioned four different cannibals and the clue seemed like present tense. I dunno.
'Course I don't know how the pointing clue would come into this.
-And she could've mentioned her in there because she didn't want to tell us how many were dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:23 pm
Maybe aggeloß is referring to someone's name?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:25 pm
surprised Donde! Going off what you said...
The Mysterious Priest?
PRIEST.
Church leader? There was something about that in that passage I googled.
(haha my first thoughts when I read that passage was Rev but then I realised he's not playing xD)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:32 pm
Vitamin Crack surprised Donde! Going off what you said... The Mysterious Priest? PRIEST. Church leader? There was something about that in that passage I googled. (haha my first thoughts when I read that passage was Rev but then I realised he's not playing xD) He hasn't posted once. That's kinda suspicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:41 pm
Clone the Sputterer We can assume Zett isn't a cannibal this game or he's giving an oscar-worthy performance. Can we assume that? I don't see where you got that idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
