|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:35 pm
GoldenMyr Unless her kid is named Amber I fail to see the irony. the police were harsh on her for the rather large mistake she appearently made only to find that their harshness was also a mistake. Assuming leaving children to be abducted in an area where children have been abducted is a bad thing.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:38 pm
But was her kid abducted, or did he / she just have to sit on the porch for a while? Just because a famous abduction took place there once doesn't necessarily mean that area is prone to that specific crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:43 pm
Qyp Jin Shirosin Qyp Jin Shirosin If you think raping little boys is awesome, QYP. confused So you got any male friends you hug? You must be gay then.
I don't use 'dynamic entry' and yell "Lee, take em off". You the one going on about yaoi to Rachel right? You must be in the closet bro.
In the closet? I guess you would know... right Qyp?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:50 pm
GoldenMyr But was her kid abducted, or did he / she just have to sit on the porch for a while? Just because a famous abduction took place there once doesn't necessarily mean that area is prone to that specific crime. the frequency with which the crime occurs in the area doesn't matter. In this case, the area is famous for a particular crime which had a preventative procedure named after the victim. Its like if you made a wrong turn to avoid hitting another plane and call the other person a bad pilot as you accidentally fly too low near ground zero. Its not about the frequency but instead the magnitude of influence it had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:51 pm
Rachel Genova Qyp Jin Shirosin Qyp Jin Shirosin If you think raping little boys is awesome, QYP. confused So you got any male friends you hug? You must be gay then.
I don't use 'dynamic entry' and yell "Lee, take em off". You the one going on about yaoi to Rachel right? You must be in the closet bro.
In the closet? I guess you would know... right Qyp? Well, I am a skeleton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:54 pm
I think that simile made me even further from seeing the irony. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:21 pm
Qyp Jin Shirosin Qyp Jin Shirosin If you think raping little boys is awesome, QYP. confused So you got any male friends you hug? You must be gay then.
I don't use 'dynamic entry' and yell "Lee, take em off". You the one going on about yaoi to Rachel right? You must be in the closet bro.
I called Dynamic Entry 'gay sex jutsu'. I didn't say I had a problem with homosexuality. I have a problem with Lee being like 13. And its not 'going on' to say it looked like she was into that sort of thing ONE TIME. Get your facts straight, bro.
Luff: If you will read back, I never said anything about Kakashi one way or another. And Kakashi didn't bring Yamoto, Tsunade did. And anything having to do with Sasuke is just awful in my eyes. But his fetish is snakes that Orochimaru provides. Hell, Haku is more right in the head than Sasuke.
But in the end Kakashi would tear Gai apart. Because he can also open the gates. Gai is as weak to ninjutsu as Kakashi is to Taijutsu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:02 pm
What ever, just shut the ******** up about ***** become he can open the Eight Gates, doesn't mean he can handle it.
Guy could still just stand after opening the 7th. He works hard day and night to keep his open to top condition, while Kakashi relies on his Ninjutsu. Opening the Gates is alone takes a lot of skill. Kakashi probably started to learn how to use them, but never really trained to use them at their full potential.
To be honest, Kakashi would not be able to handle Guy with the Seventh Gate open... Considering like, he defeated a man said to have the power of a single Bijuu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:21 am
I don't see why we should be stiffled when we don't bring them up. We comment that others bring him up.
Also, as Kouri said, we seem to only be offending you, meanwhile, two people have verbally expressed dissatisfaction with the constant posting of *****... and those people have yet to be stiffled. No, they are encouraged to post. So, for one final time, I'm willing a compromise. Don't post that stuff here and we won't talk about it. You can make a fan thread in the Misc. Section to talk about how great molesting kids is. rolleyes
Otherwise, shut both parties up. Not just one. -_-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kouri-chan_xx Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:44 am
OK, let's stop talking about Dynamic Entry, ***** and TAKE THEM OFF!!! (totally taken out of context, btw). Instead, OMG.... so I was surfing tumblr and I found this!!!! crying http://ginseng-tea-cat.deviantart.com/ It's.... a trainwreck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:54 am
Rachel Genova I don't see why we should be stiffled when we don't bring them up. We comment that others bring him up.
Also, as Kouri said, we seem to only be offending you, meanwhile, two people have verbally expressed dissatisfaction with the constant posting of *****... and those people have yet to be stiffled. No, they are encouraged to post. So, for one final time, I'm willing a compromise. Don't post that stuff here and we won't talk about it. You can make a fan thread in the Misc. Section to talk about how great molesting kids is. rolleyes
Otherwise, shut both parties up. Not just one. -_- She was actually saying most people like Guy, and therefore please shut up about ***** about Guy = fine and dandy for most people. Talking about him being a ***** and other sexual innuendos of other characters = going to far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:04 am
Personally, everyone is intitled to their own opinions whatever the subject or matter it may be. But there are certain subjects that shouldn't be brought up and that wasn't one of them. So if everyone can reframe from bringing up this certain topic is appreciative not only to the crew but others that have to read. Anyone the continues or trys to start it will be given a strict warning, I not going to deal with people at each other throat over that!! Its just crude and immature stare There are people in this world that have been victim and such from that.....stuff. Its not funny to laugh about nor is it okay to bring it up. If its not okay to talk about it at work/school/home then its not okay here.
Your free to talk about Guy and share your opinions on him. But that there is not acceptable and shouldn't be brought up at all what so ever. So refrain from it or a warning. If you continue to bring it up let alone start it again after that, The warning will be a strike instead. Your call
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:56 am
Qyp, I told you about talking to me like that. You can 'shut the ******** up' just as easily. Never heard the term 'fuel to the fire' have you?
I will stop commenting the way I want to comment when the stuff stops getting posted. Until then, give me all the strikes you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kouri-chan_xx Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:28 am
OK. This is turning into a trainwreck, just like that other unrelated trainwreck I linked to to try to distract us. (Because nothing is as hilarious as schadenfreude!)
Qyp: Not gonna lie, your speech style is somewhat aggressive. I'm not saying to change who you are, but I would moderate it depending on who I'm talking to, and on the situation.
Jin: No need to get so defensive. On the flip side, everyone knows that Qyp just overstates things on the net. (Qyp even constantly says it, lol.) There's no need to defend yourself when all of us can see what's happening and won't think any less of you just because you didn't talk back. If you responded because of personal pride, then just remember that this is a public space. Think of the people who have to read this and feel the tension.
Guy & *****: The Dynamic Entry and Take them off, Lee! comments are taken out of context. I find the association of the two completely ridiculous. Truth be told, I thought you guys were trolling about this, until I realised that you weren't. Still, he's only a fictional character. Chill out about defending his manly honour.
Everyone else: Guess it's time to put the popcorn away. Because I think that this whole affair just showcased the worst of those involved and they are not normally like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
