|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:13 pm
I need the exact height, width, length, density, weight, and inertia, as well as the torque provided to alter the x, then I will also need the X,Y,Z coordinates of the mirrored image in which the angular velocity will begin so that I may calculate the proper reference point, we're making a new alphabet, I can't do this haphazzardly
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:14 pm
^Is talking about something weird?
what are we talking about making?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:17 pm
< gets what your trying to say
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:18 pm
Aoshi_Dojima I need the exact height, width, length, density, weight, and inertia, as well as the torque provided to alter the x, then I will also need the X,Y,Z coordinates of the mirrored image in which the angular velocity will begin so that I may calculate the proper reference point, we're making a new alphabet, I can't do this haphazzardly It's a 2 demensional object, you dont need to know any of that especially in an area were inertia does not exist cause how in the world will we have and ever moving alphabet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:22 pm
silentbobx Aoshi_Dojima I need the exact height, width, length, density, weight, and inertia, as well as the torque provided to alter the x, then I will also need the X,Y,Z coordinates of the mirrored image in which the angular velocity will begin so that I may calculate the proper reference point, we're making a new alphabet, I can't do this haphazzardly It's a 2 demensional object, you dont need to know any of that especially in an area were inertia does not exist cause how in the world will we have and ever moving alphabet? if that is true, then you tilted the paper the x is on, thus meaning you are just reading it at an angle, not changing anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:25 pm
Aoshi_Dojima silentbobx Aoshi_Dojima I need the exact height, width, length, density, weight, and inertia, as well as the torque provided to alter the x, then I will also need the X,Y,Z coordinates of the mirrored image in which the angular velocity will begin so that I may calculate the proper reference point, we're making a new alphabet, I can't do this haphazzardly It's a 2 demensional object, you dont need to know any of that especially in an area were inertia does not exist cause how in the world will we have and ever moving alphabet? if that is true, then you tilted the paper the x is on, thus meaning you are just reading it at an angle, not changing anything. unless I tilted it on some program such as illustrator cs thus seperating it from the paper...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:28 pm
silentbobx Aoshi_Dojima silentbobx Aoshi_Dojima I need the exact height, width, length, density, weight, and inertia, as well as the torque provided to alter the x, then I will also need the X,Y,Z coordinates of the mirrored image in which the angular velocity will begin so that I may calculate the proper reference point, we're making a new alphabet, I can't do this haphazzardly It's a 2 demensional object, you dont need to know any of that especially in an area were inertia does not exist cause how in the world will we have and ever moving alphabet? if that is true, then you tilted the paper the x is on, thus meaning you are just reading it at an angle, not changing anything. unless I tilted it on some program such as illustrator cs thus seperating it from the paper... but the paper is simulated, a paper is but a plane, thus simulated as X and Y axis by all computer programs that provide imaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:33 pm
But the X is no longer read with me tilting the paper and the x as it is a symbol has been titled in reference to everything else. Nothing went with it... And and paper is a 3d plane that you can interact with not some electronic program where everything is anything and nothing is all that is empty...i dont think i made sense but YEAH... i hope i did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:37 pm
silentbobx But the X is no longer read with me tilting the paper and the x as it is a symbol has been titled in reference to everything else. Nothing went with it... And and paper is a 3d plane that you can interact with not some electronic program where everything is anything and nothing is all that is empty...i dont think i made sense but YEAH... i hope i did. Then it is simple, you must make X's of varying degrees to compensate, thus each degree is a new sound, and due to there being 360 degrees, at least one sound will have at least one similarity to X at 6.954736211 degrees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:40 pm
Unless instead of taking the scientifical route, we make it some sort of metamorphosis where its a change done where it can have no relation to the original, sound wise and we make it look like an x but with loops and tilted and cut on a corner. yeah?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:42 pm
^is possibly confused? silentbobx Unless instead of taking the scientifical route, we make it some sort of metamorphosis where its a change done where it can have no relation to the original, sound wise and we make it look like an x but with loops and tilted and cut on a corner. yeah? Possibly, but then you will be making a new alphabet for a new language, unrelated to english in it's stylings and sounds, therefore my original hypothesis is null and void, thus meaning I must make a new theorem for this new alphabetic anomaly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:46 pm
Aoshi_Dojima ^is possibly confused? silentbobx Unless instead of taking the scientifical route, we make it some sort of metamorphosis where its a change done where it can have no relation to the original, sound wise and we make it look like an x but with loops and tilted and cut on a corner. yeah? Possibly, but then you will be making a new alphabet for a new language, unrelated to english in it's stylings and sounds, therefore my original hypothesis is null and void, thus meaning I must make a new theorem for this new alphabetic anomaly. ^thinks I be conefoosed. Either way we wouldn't have been able to include it into a system as smashed into the cold stone walls of history as the English alphabet... so then LETS MAKE A NEW LANGUAGE! and that metamorphosis of the letter X is the first letter of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
