|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:30 pm
Yup. My comments are mainly insults.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:25 am
He lies. His comments are usually just stupid. ._.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:40 pm
You speak the truth. That, I must admit.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:18 pm
I thought his comments were mostly...um....blatant lies he pulls outta his meatbag butt.......oh, sorry ^^; that's my Vampie-ness talking XD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 12:56 pm
Blatant idiocy, is more like it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:08 pm
I agree with what haru just said....amazingly....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 6:44 am
Hey, even the local 'tard can be right sometimes. Sadly, I agree with him too. But we love you anyway, Haru. 't wouldn't be the same without you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:45 am
Indeed it wouldn't.....there might actually be intelligent conversation....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:50 pm
Which isn't allowed, I might add. : P
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:21 pm
I can be intelligent, but I choose not to. For example: Do you know the specifics of the XYZ Affair? I bet you don't. I'm in AP US History. Which, when abbreviated, is APUSH.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 5:35 pm
Surprisingly, I do. I was in APUSH two years ago, so I know the deal. You should have picked a different topic, because the XYZ affair was actually pretty significant, and it's fairly well-known.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 7:02 pm
peshaw, took AP history 3 years ago when I was in Highschol...easiest A I ever got! cool
How many of you know the difference between Leninism and Stalinism? Or who can tell me what Perestroika is, or nomenklatura system? Or the difference between Fascism, Communism and Socialism? surprised
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:11 pm
AP US History. And, Communism, in most cases, does not adhear to the laws of Socialism. How 'bout the Eaton Affair?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:14 am
....if I may interject, but communism and socialism are similar as one is the steppingstone to the other...It also depends on who's view of Communism you're looking at as well. If you're viewing it from Marx and Russia's side or Plato and Western Europe's (ex. France's) side...
Eaton Affair involved Pres. Jackson's cabinent did it not? *is pulling from depths of his memory*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 3:26 pm
Yes. Yes it did. It also involved his first Vice President.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|