|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yamiko Enoki Vice Captain
Fashionable Businesswoman
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:12 pm
THIS IS RAPE!! ...oh hi Tori. ;D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:16 pm
Yamiko Enoki THIS IS RAPE!! ...oh hi Tori. ;D ....nya? Q~ Q? r-rape? gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yamiko Enoki Vice Captain
Fashionable Businesswoman
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:24 pm
Kotori Yamiko Enoki THIS IS RAPE!! ...oh hi Tori. ;D ....nya? Q~ Q? r-rape? gonk
No no no, shush shush *pet pet* =w= ..........it'd all end quickly. He's a dude after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:32 pm
Iblis? Iblis= Akino? eek burning_eyes @Faust: I see what you mean. Although I've slightly revised my logic since then. Imagine the following characteristics for the powers of the Bayesian Empirimancer: 'Declared', 'Not declared', 'Successful', and 'Failure'. These can be further organized into the groups. (Declared|Successful), (Declared|Failure), (Not Declared). Not declared becomes a strong evidence against a declared event because, well if you don't say anything, your powers won't do anything. Now in the case of (D|S) and (D|F), With Empirical reasoning each time a case occurs in their respective groups, you get an appropriate shift in probability. Here is the kicker. Supposing magic was tangible in our world (I'm 100% sure it exists but we are unable to interact with it, call me a Soft Agnostic), the exact power of the Bayesian Empirimancer would be to bring declared events to reality based on the probability of the event declared. This is however limited by needing reasonable priors. If you've failed casting many times in your career, there's no way you can declare a 100% success rate when you use your powers (The exception being if you bring in evidence- fuel, incendiary devices, other flammable crap- to boost your success rate in one particular case). Your priors however, would be entirely influenced by personal experiences. Wow all of this is alot of talking. This gave me two ideas. What would it be like to have 2 Bayesian Empirimancer's duel and would the nemisis of a Bayesian Empirimancer be a Agnostic Empiricist? Wait, who's getting raped?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:02 am
Home from work and not one post? You slackers...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:12 am
rp-ing, studying, and preparing myself to deal with potential drama OnO. i personally prefer to be watching it than being right in the center lolol x'D
*raeps j's head* scream scream scream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:12 am
ninja
-hides under a small rock-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Faustpatrone Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:31 am
Kei_Reila Iblis? Iblis= Akino? eek burning_eyes @Faust: I see what you mean. Although I've slightly revised my logic since then. Imagine the following characteristics for the powers of the Bayesian Empirimancer: 'Declared', 'Not declared', 'Successful', and 'Failure'. These can be further organized into the groups. (Declared|Successful), (Declared|Failure), (Not Declared). Not declared becomes a strong evidence against a declared event because, well if you don't say anything, your powers won't do anything. Now in the case of (D|S) and (D|F), With Empirical reasoning each time a case occurs in their respective groups, you get an appropriate shift in probability. Here is the kicker. Supposing magic was tangible in our world (I'm 100% sure it exists but we are unable to interact with it, call me a Soft Agnostic), the exact power of the Bayesian Empirimancer would be to bring declared events to reality based on the probability of the event declared. This is however limited by needing reasonable priors. If you've failed casting many times in your career, there's no way you can declare a 100% success rate when you use your powers (The exception being if you bring in evidence- fuel, incendiary devices, other flammable crap- to boost your success rate in one particular case). Your priors however, would be entirely influenced by personal experiences. Wow all of this is alot of talking. This gave me two ideas. What would it be like to have 2 Bayesian Empirimancer's duel and would the nemisis of a Bayesian Empirimancer be a Agnostic Empiricist? Wait, who's getting raped? Then it wouldn't be bayesian or an empiricist would it?
with magic, the whole priniciple of what makes it empirical gets thrown off....in addition to that the bayes theorem requires full solid proof and evidence in order for it to apply to the probability...
if there was a class called a bayesian empirimancer..that in itself is a paradox ;D
Nope, I think it'd be the idealist xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:59 am
-yawns-
"you know i have no idea what Faust and Kei are saying"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Faustpatrone Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:12 pm
Mimice -yawns- "you know i have no idea what Faust and Kei are saying" xDDDD
-patpat-
don't worry...when you grow up, you'll understandddd 4laugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:23 pm
Faustpatrone Mimice -yawns- "you know i have no idea what Faust and Kei are saying" xDDDD
-patpat-
don't worry...when you grow up, you'll understandddd 4laugh "yeah that what all adults say, and guess what im older and i still don't understand where babies come from, or why i can't wacth tv late at night, or mommy and daddy need alone time to wrestle" XDD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:02 pm
*raeps mimice's chair then punts mimice towards faust*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:07 pm
Tezu *raeps mimice's chair then punts mimice towards faust* -grabs your foot and flips you on your butt- -pokes your face- XP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
