|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:59 pm
hmm...what other good films are there...
Milo and Otis.
a classic. nothing comes close save for ESB
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:06 pm
True... or ANH... or ROTJ... I'm not a big fan of ESB really, comparitively. I dunno why, it just... moved too slowly when I was a kid, and it wasn't what I watch the SW films for.
I personally like the battles more than the plotline, but for some reason, If it doesn't have a good plot, I hate the movie anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:10 pm
Battles are good and all. thats why they call it Star Wars. conflict is a necessary part of the series. but no movie is worth seeing if theres a lousy story driving it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:13 pm
nice damn ship by the way...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:18 pm
Yea. That was my beef about AOTC. Love and war just don't work together.
And the ship in my sig is supposedly the future Jedi Starfighter...
I added a couple more banners to the banner page. You may find one out of eight you may like...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:20 pm
helluva nose on it. looks more stylish than practical though...
oh, and love and war do work when its written well. AotC wasnt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:13 pm
i suppose the length goes to supplement the power of the laser cannons in the nose and the overall capacity for vital systems. my beef is the tiny size of the engines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:26 pm
So they're tiny. Doesn't mean they can't be vectored properly to produce the speed of the E-wing (which according to the website i got this off of, it does)
Its a bit longer though, so the engines might draw some power from the body as well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:35 pm
i think it's a little /too/ narrow for power supply like that... keep in mind, the lasers take up space. i'm guessing they're probably kick-a**, which means less room for other stuff. maybe towards the back of the nose, but that's hardly any kind of abnormally large power source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:38 pm
It could be micro power generators... kinda like on Storm, Isolder's fighter.
I mean everything could be just downsized...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:49 pm
yeah, but the makers of Isolder's fighter never revealed their secrets. the Republic kept hounding htem, but they never gave in.
i assume the new jedi fighter is made by or under the sponsorship of the republic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:57 pm
Dunno. I'll find the info later and post it. I g2g for the night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:47 pm
k, thanks.
btw, maybe we should move this to the hangar...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:12 am
Remember folks, the TIE fighter series have little pidling engines, but are known for their insane speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:52 pm
also keep in mind that they have no hyperdrive and very little mass, as they have small weapons, no shields, and no life-support, and a smaller power source since the solar panels are used instead. the ionization reactor is practically external, too.
which is why the survivability rate of the things is almost 0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
