|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:49 pm
Unless you want to count Dragon Warrior.
That game is the king s**t, still.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:50 pm
themightyjello Striker Nightmare Garam Nijashi Hikuro All ******** final fantasy games are the same....white mage, black mage, warrior, defender, etc etc.....So yea....same s**t, same spells.... You obviously haven't played a FF game since two, have you? Hell, in two, you actually had distinguished characters. Actually, (barring Tactics) they kept the individual character classes up until FF5, which was the point in which your characters started becoming mutable classes rather than static ones. In 5 they used a job-change system similar to the one used in Tactics where you could level up your jobs and take abilities from one to use on another job. In 6 all characters could learn all types of magic but still retained their character-specific abilities and weapon types (which sometimes made them into a specific role in the party but usually it was just a utility thing). 7 had no classes nor did 8. 9 was the game that they advertised as "bringing back the crystal" because that was where they went back to the old standard of having crystals be a major part of the game setting and at the same time they also re-introduced each character having a set class that you couldn't change. X kept that (though you could always take someone off their predetermined path if you had the items for it), X-2 apparently ditched it (though I never played that one), and XI was all about classes since it was an MMO. XII started each character as a 'class' but you could advance them any way you wanted after that. I dunno how 13 works. 13 Is a bland, linear version of X's. You get a sphere grid, but the only good sections of it are the ones the character starts off with. More so, there's a best one of the three, that basically pigeon-holes you into putting that character into a set class if you want him or her to the best they can. Likewise, the story is completely straight forward, minus a open roaming portion where you go around in a field and kill monsters like you're bounty hunting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:50 pm
You know a game is old as hell when it is called 'Dragon Warrior'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:50 pm
FFVII just left a lasting impression for me. VIII was good, but not as good. I haven't found anything quite that level since. Even with the better graphics, it always feels like something is missing. I like the earlier better than the later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:50 pm
I'm not a huge fan of FF.
But, I did, enjoy FF9, and played it quite often when I was younger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:51 pm
Sokoya Ramak HRRRGRGRGRRRGR PAIN. LOTS OF PAIN. Whoa wait a second. I said im enjoying it. I never said it was my favorite. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:53 pm
Man, X-2 was an awesome game. So was X, for that matter. VIII's story and characters (except Zell) sucked donkey balls, but the system was original and interesting. IX haters can go to hell, though. If you don't uderstand why it's awesome, I'm not sure I can explain it.
Also, my first RPG was Shining Force on the Genisis, which is a little sad, considering that I'm probably younger than half of you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:54 pm
Sokoya Ramak HRRRGRGRGRRRGR PAIN. LOTS OF PAIN. -hugs- D= I'll make the pain go away. In some places only though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:54 pm
Shut the ******** up, CHICKEN-WUSS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:54 pm
Tybalt Steele Man, X-2 was an awesome game. So was X, for that matter. VIII's story and characters (except Zell) sucked donkey balls, but the system was original and interesting. IX haters can go to hell, though. If you don't uderstand why it's awesome, I'm not sure I can explain it. Also, my first RPG was Shining Force on the Genisis, which is a little sad, considering that I'm probably younger than half of you. X-2 = Charlie's Angels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:55 pm
I've only played Tactics. It was cool, but then again I have nothing to compare to.
Legend of the Dragoon was five kinds of kickass, even if the characters were a little whiny. Never got past Disc 3; it was scratched or something and goddammit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:55 pm
Tybalt Steele Man, X-2 was an awesome game. So was X, for that matter. VIII's story and characters (except Zell) sucked donkey balls, but the system was original and interesting. IX haters can go to hell, though. If you don't uderstand why it's awesome, I'm not sure I can explain it. Also, my first RPG was Shining Force on the Genisis, which is a little sad, considering that I'm probably younger than half of you. My first RPG game was... Kingdom hearts so I definatly fail harder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:55 pm
Just get an emulator, Kaz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:56 pm
Is Kingdom Hearts even an RPG?
I mean sure, you level.
But beyond that.
Nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:57 pm
Vash Sengou Tybalt Steele Man, X-2 was an awesome game. So was X, for that matter. VIII's story and characters (except Zell) sucked donkey balls, but the system was original and interesting. IX haters can go to hell, though. If you don't uderstand why it's awesome, I'm not sure I can explain it. Also, my first RPG was Shining Force on the Genisis, which is a little sad, considering that I'm probably younger than half of you. My first RPG game was... Kingdom hearts so I definatly fail harder. No, see, this isn't fail on my part, it's fail on the part of everyone who's first RPD was on the PS or later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
