|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:03 am
AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner After looking through my cam, I found an old pic of my SG.  What model is that? It's a Westfield E2000 SG. Bet you thought it was a Gibson. Everyone does because of it's headstock. Yeah... actually I believe that's close enough for them to be sued by Gibson. I'm not suprised thay haven't yet, to be honest. xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:35 pm
James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner After looking through my cam, I found an old pic of my SG.  What model is that? It's a Westfield E2000 SG. Bet you thought it was a Gibson. Everyone does because of it's headstock. Yeah... actually I believe that's close enough for them to be sued by Gibson. I'm not suprised thay haven't yet, to be honest. xp Well, do you honestly think that Gibson's revenue would be impacted by the Westfield company, considering the price and noteriety of the guitars (I mean come on, they aren't widely known). Of course, I would have said the same for the PRS doublecut - PRS having a double cut would not have cut into Gibson's profit any, because if your a person that wants a Gibson, your not going to say "nah i'll go with this PRS doublecut, even though I'm a Gibson nut". On a similar note, PRS now makes Doublecuts again. They appealed on the case and won it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:47 am
AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner After looking through my cam, I found an old pic of my SG.  What model is that? It's a Westfield E2000 SG. Bet you thought it was a Gibson. Everyone does because of it's headstock. Yeah... actually I believe that's close enough for them to be sued by Gibson. I'm not suprised thay haven't yet, to be honest. xp Well, do you honestly think that Gibson's revenue would be impacted by the Westfield company, considering the price and noteriety of the guitars (I mean come on, they aren't widely known). Of course, I would have said the same for the PRS doublecut - PRS having a double cut would not have cut into Gibson's profit any, because if your a person that wants a Gibson, your not going to say "nah i'll go with this PRS doublecut, even though I'm a Gibson nut". On a similar note, PRS now makes Doublecuts again. They appealed on the case and won it. Yeah I know what you mean, and about the PRS, don't you mean the Singlecut? I thought Gibson sued PRS because the Singlecut looked too much like the Les Paul. I mean, PRS must be a bit stupid, making it with a Heritage Sunburst kinda colour. xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:38 pm
James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner It's a Westfield E2000 SG. Bet you thought it was a Gibson. Everyone does because of it's headstock. Yeah... actually I believe that's close enough for them to be sued by Gibson. I'm not suprised thay haven't yet, to be honest. xp Well, do you honestly think that Gibson's revenue would be impacted by the Westfield company, considering the price and noteriety of the guitars (I mean come on, they aren't widely known). Of course, I would have said the same for the PRS doublecut - PRS having a double cut would not have cut into Gibson's profit any, because if your a person that wants a Gibson, your not going to say "nah i'll go with this PRS doublecut, even though I'm a Gibson nut". On a similar note, PRS now makes Doublecuts again. They appealed on the case and won it. Yeah I know what you mean, and about the PRS, don't you mean the Singlecut? I thought Gibson sued PRS because the Singlecut looked too much like the Les Paul. I mean, PRS must be a bit stupid, making it with a Heritage Sunburst kinda colour. xp Yeah I meant single cut on all acounts, I was just thinking of how frickin sweet it would be to have a Gibson Les Paul Faded DoubleCut. *drool* But Gibson wasn't suing for the colors of the guitars, they were claiming the outline of the guitar body was close enough to the Les Paul to warrant them suing. They ARE pretty close, but I think the PRS's lower horn looks much too different from the Gibson to compare the two. And again, if your a Gibson person, your going to get the Gibson no matter what, and likewise with PRS.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:44 pm
AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner It's a Westfield E2000 SG. Bet you thought it was a Gibson. Everyone does because of it's headstock. Yeah... actually I believe that's close enough for them to be sued by Gibson. I'm not suprised thay haven't yet, to be honest. xp Well, do you honestly think that Gibson's revenue would be impacted by the Westfield company, considering the price and noteriety of the guitars (I mean come on, they aren't widely known). Of course, I would have said the same for the PRS doublecut - PRS having a double cut would not have cut into Gibson's profit any, because if your a person that wants a Gibson, your not going to say "nah i'll go with this PRS doublecut, even though I'm a Gibson nut". On a similar note, PRS now makes Doublecuts again. They appealed on the case and won it. Yeah I know what you mean, and about the PRS, don't you mean the Singlecut? I thought Gibson sued PRS because the Singlecut looked too much like the Les Paul. I mean, PRS must be a bit stupid, making it with a Heritage Sunburst kinda colour. xp Yeah I meant single cut on all acounts, I was just thinking of how frickin sweet it would be to have a Gibson Les Paul Faded DoubleCut. *drool* But Gibson wasn't suing for the colors of the guitars, they were claiming the outline of the guitar body was close enough to the Les Paul to warrant them suing. They ARE pretty close, but I think the PRS's lower horn looks much too different from the Gibson to compare the two. And again, if your a Gibson person, your going to get the Gibson no matter what, and likewise with PRS. Yeah. It's all about the brand. However, any smart guitarist would try out the alternatives. On that principle, Gibson would of sued because the singlecut was an alternative, and people must of found it better *cough*Gibsonqualitycontrol*cough*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:59 pm
James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner I'm not suprised thay haven't yet, to be honest. xp Well, do you honestly think that Gibson's revenue would be impacted by the Westfield company, considering the price and noteriety of the guitars (I mean come on, they aren't widely known). Of course, I would have said the same for the PRS doublecut - PRS having a double cut would not have cut into Gibson's profit any, because if your a person that wants a Gibson, your not going to say "nah i'll go with this PRS doublecut, even though I'm a Gibson nut". On a similar note, PRS now makes Doublecuts again. They appealed on the case and won it. Yeah I know what you mean, and about the PRS, don't you mean the Singlecut? I thought Gibson sued PRS because the Singlecut looked too much like the Les Paul. I mean, PRS must be a bit stupid, making it with a Heritage Sunburst kinda colour. xp Yeah I meant single cut on all acounts, I was just thinking of how frickin sweet it would be to have a Gibson Les Paul Faded DoubleCut. *drool* But Gibson wasn't suing for the colors of the guitars, they were claiming the outline of the guitar body was close enough to the Les Paul to warrant them suing. They ARE pretty close, but I think the PRS's lower horn looks much too different from the Gibson to compare the two. And again, if your a Gibson person, your going to get the Gibson no matter what, and likewise with PRS. Yeah. It's all about the brand. However, any smart guitarist would try out the alternatives. On that principle, Gibson would of sued because the singlecut was an alternative, and people must of found it better *cough*Gibsonqualitycontrol*cough* Yes but again, if your a Gibson man, your a Gibson man. Not many Gibson men would not buy Gibsons because of slack quality control. They'd just command that people that have problems with the QC buy higher end models smile Personally though, I don't care HOW bad the QC is, as soon as I'm done with this project, I'll be saving for a Faded LP Double Cut. Mmmm...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:24 pm
AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner I'm not suprised thay haven't yet, to be honest. xp Well, do you honestly think that Gibson's revenue would be impacted by the Westfield company, considering the price and noteriety of the guitars (I mean come on, they aren't widely known). Of course, I would have said the same for the PRS doublecut - PRS having a double cut would not have cut into Gibson's profit any, because if your a person that wants a Gibson, your not going to say "nah i'll go with this PRS doublecut, even though I'm a Gibson nut". On a similar note, PRS now makes Doublecuts again. They appealed on the case and won it. Yeah I know what you mean, and about the PRS, don't you mean the Singlecut? I thought Gibson sued PRS because the Singlecut looked too much like the Les Paul. I mean, PRS must be a bit stupid, making it with a Heritage Sunburst kinda colour. xp Yeah I meant single cut on all acounts, I was just thinking of how frickin sweet it would be to have a Gibson Les Paul Faded DoubleCut. *drool* But Gibson wasn't suing for the colors of the guitars, they were claiming the outline of the guitar body was close enough to the Les Paul to warrant them suing. They ARE pretty close, but I think the PRS's lower horn looks much too different from the Gibson to compare the two. And again, if your a Gibson person, your going to get the Gibson no matter what, and likewise with PRS. Yeah. It's all about the brand. However, any smart guitarist would try out the alternatives. On that principle, Gibson would of sued because the singlecut was an alternative, and people must of found it better *cough*Gibsonqualitycontrol*cough* Yes but again, if your a Gibson man, your a Gibson man. Not many Gibson men would not buy Gibsons because of slack quality control. They'd just command that people that have problems with the QC buy higher end models smile Personally though, I don't care HOW bad the QC is, as soon as I'm done with this project, I'll be saving for a Faded LP Double Cut. Mmmm... Cool. Me personally, i'm gonna stick with fenders and epis until i think i'm worth getting a gibson.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:42 pm
James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner AshWufei James Tanner Yeah I know what you mean, and about the PRS, don't you mean the Singlecut? I thought Gibson sued PRS because the Singlecut looked too much like the Les Paul. I mean, PRS must be a bit stupid, making it with a Heritage Sunburst kinda colour. xp Yeah I meant single cut on all acounts, I was just thinking of how frickin sweet it would be to have a Gibson Les Paul Faded DoubleCut. *drool* But Gibson wasn't suing for the colors of the guitars, they were claiming the outline of the guitar body was close enough to the Les Paul to warrant them suing. They ARE pretty close, but I think the PRS's lower horn looks much too different from the Gibson to compare the two. And again, if your a Gibson person, your going to get the Gibson no matter what, and likewise with PRS. Yeah. It's all about the brand. However, any smart guitarist would try out the alternatives. On that principle, Gibson would of sued because the singlecut was an alternative, and people must of found it better *cough*Gibsonqualitycontrol*cough* Yes but again, if your a Gibson man, your a Gibson man. Not many Gibson men would not buy Gibsons because of slack quality control. They'd just command that people that have problems with the QC buy higher end models smile Personally though, I don't care HOW bad the QC is, as soon as I'm done with this project, I'll be saving for a Faded LP Double Cut. Mmmm... Cool. Me personally, i'm gonna stick with fenders and epis until i think i'm worth getting a gibson. Sheeeiiit I'm getting my Doublcut ASAP cool I've also changed my project guitar plans to making a LP Junior inspired double cut guitar, with a single P90.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:21 pm
whatever happened to you tiesco ash?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:31 am
I'll have to get some new pics up of me and my new guitar... I still can hardly believe the impulse buying I had to do....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:11 pm
Xenin whatever happened to you tiesco ash? I broke that POS apart xd I gave up on it because s**t kept breaking on it, so I'm scrapping the neck, using the electronics for my project (officially now - if I ever say any different, please hit me in the head!), and i might use the body to test some finishing on. Right NOW my ever-changing plan is to customize a Saga guitar kit (cheap i know), with a custom paint job (Burgundy Mist Metalic), i'll modify the pickguard to fit with the Teisco pickups and Switches, and I'll be done with my first project smile There WILL be woodwork involved though, but i'll only be making the pickup routs larger and routing out a small airea to fit in the Teisco switches.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:12 pm
hylianhero27 I'll have to get some new pics up of me and my new guitar... I still can hardly believe the impulse buying I had to do.... what'd you get?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:35 pm
I don't have pics, but i got an ibanez electric, not sure what model at the moment, but it needs to be soldered and s**t. I also have a Squier P-Bass, and a Fender Jazz Bass.
I'm also going to check some sotres around town to get a new guitar, i only have like 200 dollars in my price range, MAYBE 250
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:31 am
AshWufei hylianhero27 I'll have to get some new pics up of me and my new guitar... I still can hardly believe the impulse buying I had to do.... what'd you get? I bought a JS100... plays soooo sweet too.... I'll see what I can do this week to get some imgs up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 5:15 pm
 My Celebrity Roundback Ovation Electric/Acoustic and I. <3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|