|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:29 pm
Yeah, so it's like the white bracket edit. Those first two rows ( going from the outside-in ) fight each other, then just gravitate inwards.
It just looks weird at a glance because it makes it look as though people start ahead off the bat, when in reality its still even.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:30 pm
themightyjello ...seems about right. @ Fox: Yeah, they did from time to time. Though Fish had to fight Tacitus like 3 rounds in a row. DOMINION DOMINION DOMINION. And all that guy's characters were a 10 on the broke-o-meter. Psychofish Not to be rude, Tac, you're a pretty cool guy OOC and all but... themightyjello FFA - Round 4
Bracket Semifinals Tacitus Nusradai [Tacitus] vs. [Rivven vs. Crimson Mist]Yusuke Urameshi [~Yusuke_Urameshii~] vs. Jonas Vexic [Jonas Vexic] [Trei vs. Shagrath] vs. Vahn Kyonuske [Vahn Kyonuske] Cziri the Lost [crzycziri] vs. Jyushin Lyger [S.Lyger] My thoughts are "OH ******** NO". I am not beating down God's left hand so I can go suffer through his right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:30 pm
I... don't get it. Why do I see 4 boxes going directly into 4 boxes going directly into 4 boxes?
@ GTB1: My favorite part of that entire debacle was how Tiem advanced to round 5 before I stopped paying attention... without fighting anyone. The only round his opponent showed up was when he was fighting a Lovecraftian elder god and he won via ringout because he was trying to race it to the moon and lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:31 pm
NOW I get the bracket. Took me forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:33 pm
That's what I was wondering, Jello, but I think I get it.
The two bottom rows are actually the first round match ups. The second round is actually the third row, and then from there it's fairly normal.
At least, that's what I'm hoping.
Otherwise I'm ******** lost.
But if I'm counting correctly, that means that the posted bracket is only 32 participants, not 64. Right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:36 pm
Old Man KB Yeah, so it's like the white bracket edit. Those first two rows ( going from the outside-in ) fight each other, then just gravitate inwards. It just looks weird at a glance because it makes it look as though people start ahead off the bat, when in reality its still even. I still don't get it. If row 1 (4 people) fights row 2 (4 people) to advance to row 3 (4 people) you're still starting the first round with 8 people in each bracket and you need 16. If it's row 1 (4 matches, 8 people) fighting row 2 (4 matches, 8 people) advancing into row 3 (4 matches, 8 people) advancing into row 4 (2 matches, 4 people) and then row 5 (1 match, 2 people) to row 6 (1 match, bracket finalists) to middle row (1 match, tournament finalists) then it makes sense. ...but that's still just a really weird way to do it. Because rows 1 and 2 sit there for 3 rounds before moving. You go through round 1 to determine the winners in rows 1 and 2, then pit those against each other to get to row 3. Which is the only way I can think of that bracket as including 64 people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:37 pm
Thank you, Ecks, for making the brackets a brain twister. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:39 pm
 This is what I see with it maybe needing to be spread out more to account for more people. The angry guy got beat by the smiley guy so now the smiley guy is moving on. If that isn't it, I'm hopelessly lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:39 pm
Vintrict Anyone who didn't attend, just read the first 200 pages of this ooc to get a feel for how hilarious the interactions were. I ascared panda. ._.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:39 pm
Vintrict Anyone who didn't attend, just read the first 200 pages of this ooc to get a feel for how hilarious the interactions were. All I got from this was a reminder of how much of a tool Ertai is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:40 pm
Unsurprisingly, that's about all I got out of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:40 pm
here, i'm gonna explain it.
and then i'm probably going to scrap it for the pyramid because i kinda like it after sketching it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:40 pm
Old Man KB This is what I see with it maybe needing to be spread out more to account for more people. The angry guy got beat by the smiley guy so now the smiley guy is moving on. If that isn't it, I'm hopelessly lost. Those guys look strangely similar...did anyone check to see if this dude is using mules?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:41 pm
The Vansin Vintrict Anyone who didn't attend, just read the first 200 pages of this ooc to get a feel for how hilarious the interactions were. All I got from this was a reminder of how much of a tool Ertai is. I usually don't take Ertai seriously. To me, I think he's mega trolling and has been doing it successfully for years. So, I usually laugh when he says things. @Tenkai: You must learn history so you don't repeat the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:43 pm
 always assume the first letter wins. yes, i mixed up w: and pure letter leading but hell, you should be able to get that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
