|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:46 pm
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
My brother noticed that a long time ago when he was watching it with me and my dad.
Between the three of us we usually notice a lot of little/strange things like that.
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:06 pm
The three Back to the future films have very many of those, if you look for them. A few examples:
In BTTF I, Lorraine has tracked Marty down to Doc's lab. Doc says, "Quick! Let's cover the time machine!" In BTTF III, Clara is at Doc's blacksmith shop and Doc says, "Quick! Cover the DeLorean!"
In BTTF I and BTTF III Doc builds elaborate models to illustrate his plans to send Marty back to the present. With both models Doc says, "You'll have have to excuse the crudity of this model, I didn't have time to paint it or to build it to scale."
In BTTF III when Marty goes to 1885, the ravine is called Shonash Ravine. It is supposed to be called Clayton Ravine, but Doc saves Clara. When Marty goes back to 1985 it is called Eastwood Ravine.
Watch in Part II, where Marty is watching the tv outside Biff Tannen's Pleasure Paradise Hotel and Casino- a shot of Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen- the cowboy villian from Part III is shown.
Doc's shirt in BTTF Part II shows a train and horses- look closely, and the DeLorean is in front of the train, showing the climatic scene from BTTF Part III.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:45 pm
I never noticed any of that rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:16 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:47 pm
I say prince of persia today
it was pretty ok
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:40 pm
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
Worth seeing for more than just the eye candy?
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:28 am
imo there was no eye candy but maybe you'll see that differently
umm
honestly I'd either rent it or just not watch it
but I wouldn't REGRET paying for it in theaters
I'd just rather not you know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:08 pm
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
Well, I think the lead character is adorable and the special effects look good.
I consider both of those to be eye candy xD
The costuming looks like it could be interesting also, so +eye candy.
I like interesting visual experiences.
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:31 am
the special effects (aside from the veeeeeery end) were crap and made me dizzy most of the time
too much editing and stuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:04 pm
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
Overdone? Poo :<
I heard that Clash of the Titans was really bad in 3D x3
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:27 pm
yeah I can totally see that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:11 pm
I heard that it wasn't designed to be 3D, they just added it at the end. I didn't care for it too much.
Prince of Persia was ok. Jake Gyllenhaal makes my heart flutter so I enjoyed it moreso because of him. The effects were decent. Jake's one outfit was kinda fun. That's about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:17 pm
did you jump when she clubbed him?
I did
I honestly had no idea that was going to happen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:48 am
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
They keep showing previews for the new Twilight gonk
Make it stop emo
♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:42 pm
really?
this one seems a lot more interesting than the last two
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
