|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:52 am
I dont have my books here y'know.
You'd have nothing to really compare with.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:53 am
mwahahaha!!! 200 pages!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:57 am
Sure... I've still got stats for the ROR ships and they're all based off D20. I'll at least be able to do it with weapons systems.
Though my terminology may be a little strange to most of you... its pretty easy to get.
A turbolaser that is 5d50? Thats a Class V Turbolaser.
A turbolaser that is 10d50 Thats a Class X Turbolaser.
It's simple and easy to understand...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:36 am
ROR?
and you have any idea what ships the GA's core fleet is using? otherwise I might just have you slap together a bunch of ships for them to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:49 am
Reality of Rebellion modification...
GA? Galactic Alliance? If you wanted me too... sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:51 am
well since you're working on some Imp ships, I thought you could just work up a few GA ships.
You dont have to if you dont want to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:10 am
Well, it would be nice to see other ships besides everyone using stolen tech...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:13 am
Nelowulf Well, it would be nice to see other ships besides everyone using stolen tech... I just have started being vague with the tech. Everyone knows what I mean when I say blaster Pistol, and people can guess what I mean when I say Huttese Freighter, ect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:18 am
Well, I would not go too overboard with fanon ships, because then we'll start loosing all sense of our attempted canonicy.
That, and as much as the OGG is supposed to help, I wouldn't want to keep a window open specifically to rmemeber the stats of every ship...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:19 am
Nelowulf Well, I would not go too overboard with fanon ships, because then we'll start loosing all sense of our attempted canonicy. That, and as much as the OGG is supposed to help, I wouldn't want to keep a window open specifically to rmemeber the stats of every ship... An alternate suggestion have you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:21 am
Well, limit the amount of ships used. By the time we reach episode II, hopefully enough comics in legacy have came out that we won't need to rely on the fanon creations.
that's just my take though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:25 am
Its a big Galaxy.
we just need a sampling of vessels to get people thinking that things have changed in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:01 am
Maybe limit the fanon ships to one vessel in each class per group.
So for the Empire...
Frigate: Wombat-class Star Frigate
Heavy Frigate: Gladius-class Star Frigate
Star Destroyer: Stalwarth-class Star Destroyer
Star Cruiser: Revenge-class Star Cruiser
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:05 am
Revenge class?
Like the Relentless?
Shouldnt it be Revenge Mark II at this point?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:54 am
Maybe... but then again we don't have a clue as to when the IMPS series was set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
