Welcome to Gaia! ::

*~Let the Fire Fall ~* A Christian Guild

Back to Guilds

 

 

Reply *~Let the Fire Fall ~* A Christian Guild
Catholic Evidence Goto Page: [] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Curium

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:49 pm


Okay so a former Catholic speaking here...lol...

Catholics are Christian, they're just a little out of the ordinary. They do have statues and saints and they do have communion every week. But they do not worship the statues, they also do not worship the saints. They pray to the saints and ask for help. It's a little odd. They also treat Mary in a very high status because she was the mother of Jesus, but I think it's a little rediculous to treat her as almost an equal to Jesus and God. And everyone says that Catholics have extra books in their Bible, well sorry to say that Catholics came before most other Christian denominations if not all. So I think that means that everyone else took those books out. I am pretty sure of that, I haven't really done any research to find that out. Okay. Hope that helps to clear some things up.
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 7:44 pm


Curium
Okay so a former Catholic speaking here...lol...

Catholics are Christian, they're just a little out of the ordinary. They do have statues and saints and they do have communion every week. But they do not worship the statues, they also do not worship the saints. They pray to the saints and ask for help. It's a little odd. They also treat Mary in a very high status because she was the mother of Jesus, but I think it's a little rediculous to treat her as almost an equal to Jesus and God. And everyone says that Catholics have extra books in their Bible, well sorry to say that Catholics came before most other Christian denominations if not all. So I think that means that everyone else took those books out. I am pretty sure of that, I haven't really done any research to find that out. Okay. Hope that helps to clear some things up.

I've heard they added the books in over the years (way back when, as in not recently). This is just what I've heard though, so don't quote me on it. sad

Thalys


Rebecca1000

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 9:53 am


Curium
Okay so a former Catholic speaking here...lol...

Catholics are Christian, they're just a little out of the ordinary. They do have statues and saints and they do have communion every week. But they do not worship the statues, they also do not worship the saints. They pray to the saints and ask for help. It's a little odd. They also treat Mary in a very high status because she was the mother of Jesus, but I think it's a little rediculous to treat her as almost an equal to Jesus and God. And everyone says that Catholics have extra books in their Bible, well sorry to say that Catholics came before most other Christian denominations if not all. So I think that means that everyone else took those books out. I am pretty sure of that, I haven't really done any research to find that out. Okay. Hope that helps to clear some things up.
Curium, that was, like, awesome how you put all that down after the recent verbal riot against Kutsuke. I feel like the 'anger vibes' are finally leaving the thread.

Can I hug you? *hugs anyway* heart

I'm Protestant too, but I'm really gonna have to pray about the "extra books of Bible" thing. I looked up the Aprocrypha in Wikipedia and looked up some Scripture someone gave up, and I'm all mixed up now. crying

I also asked my dad, an ordained minister, about it. He said that the Apocrypha was actually found with the Old Testament amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls - and that thier being in the Bible is just a theory.

I dunno, should that become a new thread? What do y'all think? (anybody) biggrin
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 10:05 am


Rebecca1000
Curium, that was, like, awesome how you put all that down after the recent verbal riot against Kutsuke. I feel like the 'anger vibes' are finally leaving the thread.

Can I hug you? *hugs anyway* heart

I'm Protestant too, but I'm really gonna have to pray about the "extra books of Bible" thing. I looked up the Aprocrypha in Wikipedia and looked up some Scripture someone gave up, and I'm all mixed up now. crying

I also asked my dad, an ordained minister, about it. He said that the Apocrypha was actually found with the Old Testament amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls - and that thier being in the Bible is just a theory.

I dunno, should that become a new thread? What do y'all think? (anybody) biggrin

Yes, I believe that is a discussion for another topic. It's best we keep this one on track. 3nodding

Thalys


Scripps

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 9:41 pm


Thalys
Curium
Okay so a former Catholic speaking here...lol...

Catholics are Christian, they're just a little out of the ordinary. They do have statues and saints and they do have communion every week. But they do not worship the statues, they also do not worship the saints. They pray to the saints and ask for help. It's a little odd. They also treat Mary in a very high status because she was the mother of Jesus, but I think it's a little rediculous to treat her as almost an equal to Jesus and God. And everyone says that Catholics have extra books in their Bible, well sorry to say that Catholics came before most other Christian denominations if not all. So I think that means that everyone else took those books out. I am pretty sure of that, I haven't really done any research to find that out. Okay. Hope that helps to clear some things up.

I've heard they added the books in over the years (way back when, as in not recently). This is just what I've heard though, so don't quote me on it. sad
The original Protestant leaders took books out.
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:48 am


A good thread about that here: http://www.internets101.com/dan/viewtopic.php?t=57

FYI, the Apocrypha and the deuterocanonical books are two completely different things (the latter is canonical ("in the Bible") and the former is not.)

NewAgeLink


marysservant

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:40 am


(I'm back for a lil while!) Regarding the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical books (the term varies whether or not you believe they are IN the Bible), Protestsants TOOK THEM OUT. Someone (I think Arilavent) posted all the references to these books in the New Testament.
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:51 am


marysservant
(I'm back for a lil while!) Regarding the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical books (the term varies whether or not you believe they are IN the Bible), Protestsants TOOK THEM OUT. Someone (I think Arilavent) posted all the references to these books in the New Testament.
Where'd he post the links? In this thread, or the Guild Linklist, or somewhere else? Sorry, I forgot. confused

Rebecca1000


marysservant

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:58 am


Collun
Peter's name is Cephas, meaning pebble. It is used in one of the letters. And if indeed he is Pope, and Christ on Earth, then why was he not blatantly followed? Some of the people, in an argument, followed Cephas, some followed Apollus (or something like that) and some Paul (I think), but if Peter were Pope, all would follow him. He isn't Pope, and the rock, which Jesus talks about, is the fact that he is the Son of God, for if Peter was the Rock, then he would be more powerful than Christ.

(I know I'm late in saying all the posts that will shortly follow this one but oh well)... Just because he WAS Peter [rock] did NOT mean that everyone was to directly follow him. Paul was also a great disciple of our Lord, and had many followers. The Pope does not have FOLLOWERS, Christ has followers, the Pope is merely, MERELY the succesor as Peter and has the "power (by the Holy Spirit)" to interpret Scripture.
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:01 am


Eteponge
Arilavent
We dont pray for saints. We pray for the dead who may not be redeemed. Before Luther decided to go snipping through the Bible, there was a passage in the second book of Maccabees...

Rebecca1000
Whoa, sorry to interrupt, but ... Maccabees??? I've heard it said before on Gaia that that once was part of the Bible (along with an Acrophycra or something???) , but I'm going to need some serious proof to believe that!

Arilavent
Oh my, please do your research, then, as it's very true. You see, is missing several books and verses that were used for hundreds of years prior to the Protestant revolution. It's missing 1 and 2 Maccabees, the rest of the Book of Esther, the last Psalm (151), and a bunch of others.

You can find it on Wikipedia, if you really want proof. Also, any encyclopedia you might own will probably have the word Septuagint in it, which is the Catholic version of the Bible.

The Deuterocanonical Books of the Septuagint are the same collection of Old Testament Scriptures that were used by Jesus Christ and the Apostles and the First Century Christians that is still used by Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Churches today. The New Testament itself undeniably referances the Deterocanonical Books in *many* places throughout the New Testament and refers to information found in them, and over 2/3 of the Old Testament prophecies quoted in the New Testament are directly from the Septuagint, which included those Extra Books.

And here are some of the quotations from the Deuterocanon in the New Testament:

Matt. 2:16 - Herod's decree of slaying innocent children was prophesied in Wis. 11:7 - slaying the holy innocents.

Matt. 6:19-20 - Jesus' statement about laying up for yourselves treasure in heaven follows Sirach 29:11 - lay up your treasure.

Matt.. 7:12 - Jesus' golden rule "do unto others" is the converse of Tobit 4:15 - what you hate, do not do to others.

Matt. 7:16,20 - Jesus' statement "you will know them by their fruits" follows Sirach 27:6 - the fruit discloses the cultivation.

Matt. 9:36 - the people were "like sheep without a shepherd" is same as Judith 11:19 - sheep without a shepherd.

Matt. 11:25 - Jesus' description "Lord of heaven and earth" is the same as Tobit 7:18 - Lord of heaven and earth.

Matt. 12:42 - Jesus refers to the wisdom of Solomon which was recorded and made part of the deuterocanonical books.

Matt. 16:18 - Jesus' reference to the "power of death" and "gates of Hades" references Wisdom 16:13.

Matt. 22:25; Mark 12:20; Luke 20:29 - Gospel writers refer to the canonicity of Tobit 3:8 and 7:11 regarding the seven brothers.

Matt. 24:15 - the "desolating sacrilege" Jesus refers to is also taken from 1 Macc. 1:54 and 2 Macc. 8:17.

Matt. 24:16 - let those "flee to the mountains" is taken from 1 Macc. 2:28.

Matt. 27:43 - if He is God's Son, let God deliver him from His adversaries follows Wisdom 2:18.

Mark 4:5,16-17 - Jesus' description of seeds falling on rocky ground and having no root follows Sirach 40:15.

Mark 9:48 - description of hell where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched references Judith 16:17.

Luke 1:42 - Elizabeth's declaration of Mary's blessedness above all women follows Uzziah's declaration in Judith 13:18.

Luke 1:52 - Mary's magnificat addressing the mighty falling from their thrones and replaced by lowly follows Sirach 10:14.

Luke 2:29 - Simeon's declaration that he is ready to die after seeing the Child Jesus follows Tobit 11:9.

Luke 13:29 - the Lord's description of men coming from east and west to rejoice in God follows Baruch 4:37.

Luke 21:24 - Jesus' usage of "fall by the edge of the sword" follows Sirach 28:18.

Luke 24:4 and Acts 1:10 - Luke's description of the two men in dazzling apparel reminds us of 2 Macc. 3:26.

John 1:3 - all things were made through Him, the Word, follows Wisdom 9:1.

John 3:13 - who has ascended into heaven but He who descended from heaven references Baruch 3:29.

John 4:48; Acts 5:12; 15:12; 2 Cor. 12:12 - Jesus', Luke's and Paul's usage of "signs and wonders" follows Wisdom 8:8.

John 5:18 - Jesus claiming that God is His Father follows Wisdom 2:16.

John 6:35-59 - Jesus' Eucharistic discourse is foreshadowed in Sirach 24:21.

John 10:22 - the identification of the feast of the dedication is taken from 1 Macc. 4:59.

John 15:6 - branches that don't bear fruit and are cut down follows Wis. 4:5 where branches are broken off.

Acts 1:15 - Luke's reference to the 120 may be a reference to 1 Macc. 3:55 - leaders of tens / restoration of the twelve.

Acts 10:34; Rom. 2:11; Gal. 2:6 - Peter's and Paul's statement that God shows no partiality references Sirach 35:12.

Acts 17:29 - description of false gods as like gold and silver made by men follows Wisdom 13:10.

Rom 1:18-25 - Paul's teaching on the knowledge of the Creator and the ignorance and sin of idolatry follows Wis. 13:1-10.

Rom. 1:20 - specifically, God's existence being evident in nature follows Wis. 13:1.

Rom. 1:23 - the sin of worshipping mortal man, birds, animals and reptiles follows Wis. 11:15; 12:24-27; 13:10; 14:8.

Rom. 1:24-27 - this idolatry results in all kinds of sexual perversion which follows Wis. 14:12,24-27.

Rom. 4:17 - Abraham is a father of many nations follows Sirach 44:19.

Rom. 5:12 - description of death and sin entering into the world is similar to Wisdom 2:24.

Rom. 9:21 - usage of the potter and the clay, making two kinds of vessels follows Wisdom 15:7.

1 Cor. 2:16 - Paul's question, "who has known the mind of the Lord?" references Wisdom 9:13.

1 Cor. 6:12-13; 10:23-26 - warning that, while all things are good, beware of gluttony, follows Sirach 36:18 and 37:28-30.

1 Cor. 8:5-6 - Paul acknowledging many "gods" but one Lord follows Wis. 13:3.

1 Cor. 10:1 - Paul's description of our fathers being under the cloud passing through the sea refers to Wisdom 19:7.

1 Cor. 10:20 - what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God refers to Baruch 4:7.

1 Cor. 15:29 - if no expectation of resurrection, it would be foolish to be baptized on their behalf follows 2 Macc. 12:43-45.

Eph. 1:17 - Paul's prayer for a "spirit of wisdom" follows the prayer for the spirit of wisdom in Wisdom 7:7.

Eph. 6:14 - Paul describing the breastplate of righteousness is the same as Wis. 5:18. See also Isaiah 59:17 and 1Thess. 5:8.

Eph. 6:13-17 - in fact, the whole discussion of armor, helmet, breastplate, sword, shield follows Wis. 5:17-20.

1 Tim. 6:15 - Paul's description of God as Sovereign and King of kings is from 2 Macc. 12:15; 13:4.

2 Tim. 4:8 - Paul's description of a crown of righteousness is similar to Wisdom 5:16.

Heb. 4:12 - Paul's description of God's word as a sword is similar to Wisdom 18:15.

Heb. 11:5 - Enoch being taken up is also referenced in Wis 4:10 and Sir 44:16. See also 2 Kings 2:1-13 & Sir 48:9 regarding Elijah.

Heb 11:35 - Paul teaches about the martyrdom of the mother and her sons described in 2 Macc. 6:18, 7:1-42.

Heb. 12:12 - the description "drooping hands" and "weak knees" comes from Sirach 25:23.

James 1:19 - let every man be quick to hear and slow to respond follows Sirach 5:11.

James 2:23 - it was reckoned to him as righteousness follows 1 Macc. 2:52 - it was reckoned to him as righteousness.

James 3:13 - James' instruction to perform works in meekness follows Sirach 3:17.

James 5:3 - describing silver which rusts and laying up treasure follows Sirach 29:10-11.

James 5:6 - condemning and killing the "righteous man" follows Wisdom 2:10-20.

1 Peter 1:6-7 - Peter teaches about testing faith by purgatorial fire as described in Wisdom 3:5-6 and Sirach 2:5.

1 Peter 1:17 - God judging each one according to his deeds refers to Sirach 16:12 - God judges man according to his deeds.

2 Peter 2:7 - God's rescue of a righteous man (Lot) is also described in Wisdom 10:6.

Rev. 1:18; Matt. 16:18 - power of life over death and gates of Hades follows Wis. 16:13.

Rev. 2:12 - reference to the two-edged sword is similar to the description of God's Word in Wisdom 18:16.

Rev. 5:7 - God is described as seated on His throne, and this is the same description used in Sirach 1:8.

Rev. 8:3-4 - prayers of the saints presented to God by the hand of an angel follows Tobit 12:12,15.

Rev. 8:7 - raining of hail and fire to the earth follows Wisdom 16:22 and Sirach 39:29.

Rev. 9:3 - raining of locusts on the earth follows Wisdom 16:9.

Rev. 11:19 - the vision of the ark of the covenant (Mary) in a cloud of glory was prophesied in 2 Macc. 2:7.

Rev. 17:14 - description of God as King of kings follows 2 Macc. 13:4.

Rev. 19:1 - the cry "Hallelujah" at the coming of the new Jerusalem follows Tobit 13:18.

Rev. 19:11 - the description of the Lord on a white horse in the heavens follows 2 Macc. 3:25; 11:8.

Rev. 19:16 - description of our Lord as King of kings is taken from 2 Macc. 13:4.

Rev. 21:19 - the description of the new Jerusalem with precious stones is prophesied in Tobit 13:17.

"Interestingly, when Luther and other Protestants rejected the Septuagint text and its Latin translation in the Vulgate, thus rejecting the Apocrypha, and instead used a smaller collection of Old Testament books from the Masoretic Hebrew text, they diverged from centuries of Christian tradition. As a result, the Roman Catholic Bible now has about twelve books more than the Protestant Bible, meaning that about 200 pages of text have been "subtracted" - one could say - from the Protestant Bible relative to the "traditional" Catholic Bible."

"The Protestants attempt to defend their rejection of the deuterocanonicals on the ground that the early Jews rejected them. However, the Jewish councils that rejected them (e.g., council of Jamnia in 90 - 100 A.D.) were the same councils that rejected the entire New Testatment canon. Thus, Protestants who reject the Orthodox and Catholic Bible are following a Jewish council who rejected Christ and the Revelation of the New Testament!"

"It is also ironic that Protestants reject the inclusion of the deuterocanonicals at councils such as Hippo (393) and Carthage (397), because these are the very same early Church councils that Protestants appeal to for the canon of the New Testament. While Protestants are willing to accept the testimony of Hippo and Carthage (the councils they most commonly cite) for the canonicity of the New Testament deuterocanonicals, they are unwilling to accept the testimony of Hippo and Carthage for the canonicity of the Old Testament deuterocanonicals. Ironic indeed!"

Here it is (it was in this thread, good work Eteponge!!!).

marysservant


marysservant

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:12 am


Regarding what Collun said about the Pope...
GNT Matthew 16:15-19

"What about you?" he asked them, "Who do you say that I am?"
Simon Peter answered, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God."
"Good for you, Simon son of John (Bar-Jonah)!" answered Jesus. "For this truth did NOT come to you from any human being [or, "was not revealed to you by man"], but it was given to you directly by my Father in Heaven. And so I tell you, Peter: you ARE a rock, and on this rock foundation I will build my church, and not even death will ever be able to overcome it. I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven; what you prohibit on earth will be prohibited in heaven, and what you permit on earth will be permitted in heaven."


Matthew 16 22-23 (after Jesus predicted his death and resurrection)

Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. "God forbid it, Lord!" he said. "That must never happen to you!"
Jesus turned around and said to Peter, "Get away from me Satan! You are an obstacle in my way, because these thoughts of yours DON'T come from God, but from human nature [or "from man"]."


These verses state that Peter was inspired to believe that Jesus was in fact the Messiah, the Son of God, yet later, he was tricked by his human nature so that he rebuked Jesus. Therefore, Catholics DO believe that the Pope CAN err. But, when inspired by the Holy Spirit, he speaks truth in regards to faith and morals.
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:58 pm


*looks at marrysservant's really long post*

Oh! That! eek Yeah, I looked at those scriptures...but, does anyone notice that those scriptures in the "extra" books/verses seem to be repeats to the books/verses that are already in the (Protestant) Bible?

Rebecca1000


Rebecca1000

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:01 pm


marysservant
Regarding what Collun said about the Pope...
GNT Matthew 16:15-19

"What about you?" he asked them, "Who do you say that I am?"
Simon Peter answered, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God."
"Good for you, Simon son of John (Bar-Jonah)!" answered Jesus. "For this truth did NOT come to you from any human being [or, "was not revealed to you by man"], but it was given to you directly by my Father in Heaven. And so I tell you, Peter: you ARE a rock, and on this rock foundation I will build my church, and not even death will ever be able to overcome it. I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven; what you prohibit on earth will be prohibited in heaven, and what you permit on earth will be permitted in heaven."


Matthew 16 22-23 (after Jesus predicted his death and resurrection)

Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. "God forbid it, Lord!" he said. "That must never happen to you!"
Jesus turned around and said to Peter, "Get away from me Satan! You are an obstacle in my way, because these thoughts of yours DON'T come from God, but from human nature [or "from man"]."


These verses state that Peter was inspired to believe that Jesus was in fact the Messiah, the Son of God, yet later, he was tricked by his human nature so that he rebuked Jesus. Therefore, Catholics DO believe that the Pope CAN err. But, when inspired by the Holy Spirit, he speaks truth in regards to faith and morals.
Would that mean, maybe, that to Catholics, the Pope could have more of the Holy Spirit in him than others?

I know that sounds crazy, but that's almost how it sounds to me....
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:05 pm


Rebecca1000
*looks at marrysservant's really long post*

Oh! That! eek Yeah, I looked at those scriptures...but, does anyone notice that those scriptures in the "extra" books/verses seem to be repeats to the books/verses that are already in the (Protestant) Bible?

Actually, the verses in the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonicals were written BEFORE the New Testament so yeah...

marysservant


marysservant

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 3:08 pm


Rebecca1000
marysservant
Regarding what Collun said about the Pope...
GNT Matthew 16:15-19

"What about you?" he asked them, "Who do you say that I am?"
Simon Peter answered, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God."
"Good for you, Simon son of John (Bar-Jonah)!" answered Jesus. "For this truth did NOT come to you from any human being [or, "was not revealed to you by man"], but it was given to you directly by my Father in Heaven. And so I tell you, Peter: you ARE a rock, and on this rock foundation I will build my church, and not even death will ever be able to overcome it. I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven; what you prohibit on earth will be prohibited in heaven, and what you permit on earth will be permitted in heaven."


Matthew 16 22-23 (after Jesus predicted his death and resurrection)

Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. "God forbid it, Lord!" he said. "That must never happen to you!"
Jesus turned around and said to Peter, "Get away from me Satan! You are an obstacle in my way, because these thoughts of yours DON'T come from God, but from human nature [or "from man"]."


These verses state that Peter was inspired to believe that Jesus was in fact the Messiah, the Son of God, yet later, he was tricked by his human nature so that he rebuked Jesus. Therefore, Catholics DO believe that the Pope CAN err. But, when inspired by the Holy Spirit, he speaks truth in regards to faith and morals.
Would that mean, maybe, that to Catholics, the Pope could have more of the Holy Spirit in him than others?

I know that sounds crazy, but that's almost how it sounds to me....

No... but the Bible said that the Holy Spirit spoke the truth through Peter, well, it REVEALED the truth to him (a better way of saying it).
Reply
*~Let the Fire Fall ~* A Christian Guild

Goto Page: [] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum