|
|
| What do you think? |
| With |
|
66% |
[ 39 ] |
| Not with |
|
33% |
[ 20 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:41 pm
Rose_of_the_dying_dawn Drisowen Short version: Love is love. If someone cares about another human being enough to marry them.... I dont think anyone should stand in their way. I respect other people's opinions, I just wont tolerate someone trying to make me believe same sex marriages are wrong. I scream and rant at those people. My mother is the person I most often ignore because of her beliefs Also(Oh God, the rant has begun): I dont see why humans have decided they have ANY say in other people's lives. People who are shun others for being in love are....are..... stressed In danger of being bitten.Or thoroughly screamed at. I love all my friends: bi, straight, or gay. I am sickened by people who think they arent "right" Ok...I'm done. EVERBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO LOVE 9im stopping now before I make this post too long) sweatdrop ::breathes calmly:: Yes......I feel better now.... ::throws confetti on you:: You're cool 3nodding
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:43 pm
theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Hmmm. I guess that is true.It is still there chose tho. Other people have no right to tell them yes or no. All I'm saying is let them choose. I'm not telling them who they should or should not care for, I'm just saying that it shouldn't be called a marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:44 pm
Drisowen Rose_of_the_dying_dawn Drisowen Short version: Love is love. If someone cares about another human being enough to marry them.... I dont think anyone should stand in their way. I respect other people's opinions, I just wont tolerate someone trying to make me believe same sex marriages are wrong. I scream and rant at those people. My mother is the person I most often ignore because of her beliefs Also(Oh God, the rant has begun): I dont see why humans have decided they have ANY say in other people's lives. People who are shun others for being in love are....are..... stressed In danger of being bitten.Or thoroughly screamed at. I love all my friends: bi, straight, or gay. I am sickened by people who think they arent "right" Ok...I'm done. EVERBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO LOVE 9im stopping now before I make this post too long) sweatdrop ::breathes calmly:: Yes......I feel better now.... ::throws confetti on you:: You're cool 3nodding Why, thank you. -throws confetti on you also- You're cool too. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:45 pm
Theangeldark-- I'm happy you liked it.... blaugh I'm good at debate, especially on this subject. If I can't debate someon into the ground, I glare enough to make them want to be there sweatdrop ....ok maybe not that much. But really, it makes me really happy that you liked what I said heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:45 pm
chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Hmmm. I guess that is true.It is still there chose tho. Other people have no right to tell them yes or no. All I'm saying is let them choose. I'm not telling them who they should or should not care for, I'm just saying that it shouldn't be called a marriage. No. It IS marrage. Jut because it's not between a man and woman does not make it not marrage. Marrage really is uniting two lovers to one another. I still no that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:49 pm
Drisowen Theangeldark-- I'm happy you liked it.... blaugh I'm good at debate, especially on this subject. If I can't debate someon into the ground, I glare enough to make them want to be there sweatdrop ....ok maybe not that much. But really, it makes me really happy that you liked what I said heart Yes.^^ And the people are complaining about same sex marrage then why not they complain about a 60 old old person geting married to a....21 year old? I find it not right either way. And what you said as ALOT of truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:52 pm
theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Hmmm. I guess that is true.It is still there chose tho. Other people have no right to tell them yes or no. All I'm saying is let them choose. I'm not telling them who they should or should not care for, I'm just saying that it shouldn't be called a marriage. No. It IS marrage. Jut because it's not between a man and woman does not make it not marrage. Marrage really is uniting two lovers to one another. I still no that. Is an apple pie with no apples still an apple pie?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:53 pm
I'm neutral for the most part. It could go either way and I really couldn't care more or less.
Though, I will contest how the same-sex marriage laws are being made. The government has no right to rule over something like this. The law should be put up by a vote from the people and not left for the government to decide. The government is sticking their foot in every door in every state and I think it has to stop. This shouldn't be made into a government affair, but should be left to the individual states and the residents of those states to decide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:54 pm
chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Hmmm. I guess that is true.It is still there chose tho. Other people have no right to tell them yes or no. All I'm saying is let them choose. I'm not telling them who they should or should not care for, I'm just saying that it shouldn't be called a marriage. No. It IS marrage. Jut because it's not between a man and woman does not make it not marrage. Marrage really is uniting two lovers to one another. I still no that. Is an apple pie with no apples still an apple pie? No. Gah. Well what SHOULD they call it then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:58 pm
Tenshi_Tengoku I'm neutral for the most part. It could go either way and I really couldn't care more or less.
Though, I will contest how the same-sex marriage laws are being made. The government has no right to rule over something like this. The law should be put up by a vote from the people and not left for the government to decide. The government is sticking their foot in every door in every state and I think it has to stop. This shouldn't be made into a government affair, but should be left to the individual states and the residents of those states to decide. Yes. Big brother likes to rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:59 pm
theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Hmmm. I guess that is true.It is still there chose tho. Other people have no right to tell them yes or no. All I'm saying is let them choose. I'm not telling them who they should or should not care for, I'm just saying that it shouldn't be called a marriage. No. It IS marrage. Jut because it's not between a man and woman does not make it not marrage. Marrage really is uniting two lovers to one another. I still no that. Is an apple pie with no apples still an apple pie? No. Gah. Well what SHOULD they call it then? don't know, just not marriage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:00 pm
chosenofchukani don't know, just not marriage *shakes head*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:05 pm
theangeldark Tenshi_Tengoku I'm neutral for the most part. It could go either way and I really couldn't care more or less.
Though, I will contest how the same-sex marriage laws are being made. The government has no right to rule over something like this. The law should be put up by a vote from the people and not left for the government to decide. The government is sticking their foot in every door in every state and I think it has to stop. This shouldn't be made into a government affair, but should be left to the individual states and the residents of those states to decide. Yes. Big brother likes to rule. Actually, before it was legalized in Massachussetts 11 other states had a vote to see if people wanted it on the next ballot. The people shot it down in all 11 states, then Mass. passed a law legalizing it with no vote at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:10 pm
chosenofchukani theangeldark Tenshi_Tengoku I'm neutral for the most part. It could go either way and I really couldn't care more or less.
Though, I will contest how the same-sex marriage laws are being made. The government has no right to rule over something like this. The law should be put up by a vote from the people and not left for the government to decide. The government is sticking their foot in every door in every state and I think it has to stop. This shouldn't be made into a government affair, but should be left to the individual states and the residents of those states to decide. Yes. Big brother likes to rule. Actually, before it was legalized in Massachussetts 11 other states had a vote to see if people wanted it on the next ballot. The people shot it down in all 11 states, then Mass. passed a law legalizing it with no vote at all. hmmm. We still shouldn't have that law. It's not really all the people's desision. It should the ones who are marring. We should just veto the law and let them get married if they want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:11 pm
I'm against it because of my religion. That is what I believe in. the end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[Onigiri]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/5a/0e/3d6c689c150e5a_flip.png?t=1351406306_6.00_00)
![.+[Incognito]+.'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/40/1e/536d3397d1e40_flip.png?t=1169732994_3.00_11)