|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:39 pm
ScionoftheBlade Dr. Awkward Yes, hair and skin follicles decompose, which accounts for the existence of most dust. I cannot believe I had to tell you that. Now, for your questions about why the semen can't just sit and "weaken", here's one answer: http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/QAA297851 This, though not a study in and of itself, elaborates further on the points I've been trying to make: http://www.collectivewizdom.com/BenefitsofMasturbation.html And finally, the New Scientist Magazine article on the Australian study: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3942-masturbating-may-protect-against-prostate-cancer.html Don't blame me if you can't understand all of this. You asked for it. Study #1 shows masturbation decreases odds of prostate cancer. I'm sure a wonderful study and I can find six more showing how everything from squid to pineapples to the same thing. Doesn't say a thing about how it will happen automatically. In fact the basis for the study is that masturbation is required because the body doesn't do it naturally. Study #2 more wonderful benefits of masturbation. Once again, masturbation is something that must be actively performed or horrible things will happen to you. Your body doesn't so it on its own. Study #3 more of the same, but this time in Australia! yay! Once again you ignored my argument and brought in facts that are irrelevant to the argument or lightly support my side of the argument... Are you sure you heard that your body MUST ejaculate regularly or will do so without external stimulus? Stuff and nonsense, kid. Of course, the body needs external stimulus, but as sexual tension builds, Mr. Happy becomes more and more sensitive to external stimuli to the point where the little friend will blow up at practically nothing. Here you go: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/teen-talk/body-mind/anatomy/pleasant-dreams-guide-nocturnal-emissions-25179.htm Of course, there are docs who think it's bunk, but like all works done by a competent professional, it stays consistent with Alfred Kinsey's statistical findings.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:51 pm
Dr. Awkward Stuff and nonsense, kid. Of course, the body needs external stimulus, but as sexual tension builds, Mr. Happy becomes more and more sensitive to external stimuli to the point where the little friend will blow up at practically nothing. Here you go: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/teen-talk/body-mind/anatomy/pleasant-dreams-guide-nocturnal-emissions-25179.htm Of course, there are docs who think it's bunk, but like all works done by a competent professional, it stays consistent with Alfred Kinsey's statistical findings. Maybe your new tot he whole "logical argument" thing but I'm wondering why you keep pointing me to websites about topics I already argued away and still don't support your central argument. And I quote "If a dream during REM sleep is very arousing, the sensation of an erect p***s pressed against a mattress can lead to erotic dreaming and ejaculation in guys." This has absolutely nothing to do with your supposed automatic ejaculation theory. Furthermore, rather then disprove any of my various proofs against you, you simply grasp at weak proofs as if hoping I'll get bored and stop disproving you. Oh and seriously? Planned Parenthood to prove a bio point? weak dude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:06 pm
ScionoftheBlade Dr. Awkward Stuff and nonsense, kid. Of course, the body needs external stimulus, but as sexual tension builds, Mr. Happy becomes more and more sensitive to external stimuli to the point where the little friend will blow up at practically nothing. Here you go: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/teen-talk/body-mind/anatomy/pleasant-dreams-guide-nocturnal-emissions-25179.htm Of course, there are docs who think it's bunk, but like all works done by a competent professional, it stays consistent with Alfred Kinsey's statistical findings. Maybe your new tot he whole "logical argument" thing but I'm wondering why you keep pointing me to websites about topics I already argued away and still don't support your central argument. And I quote "If a dream during REM sleep is very arousing, the sensation of an erect p***s pressed against a mattress can lead to erotic dreaming and ejaculation in guys." This has absolutely nothing to do with your supposed automatic ejaculation theory. Furthermore, rather then disprove any of my various proofs against you, you simply grasp at weak proofs as if hoping I'll get bored and stop disproving you. Oh and seriously? Planned Parenthood to prove a bio point? weak dude. My primary care provider, even though there's no risk of me becoming pregnant, might well have been Planned Parenthood. They're a perfectly legitimate medical practice and therefore know quite a bit about biology. I will admit, though, that they did simplify and make generalizations. However, I still sent it realizing it wasn't going to be read by someone who's scientifically literate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:30 am
Dr. Awkward ScionoftheBlade Dr. Awkward Stuff and nonsense, kid. Of course, the body needs external stimulus, but as sexual tension builds, Mr. Happy becomes more and more sensitive to external stimuli to the point where the little friend will blow up at practically nothing. Here you go: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/teen-talk/body-mind/anatomy/pleasant-dreams-guide-nocturnal-emissions-25179.htm Of course, there are docs who think it's bunk, but like all works done by a competent professional, it stays consistent with Alfred Kinsey's statistical findings. Maybe your new tot he whole "logical argument" thing but I'm wondering why you keep pointing me to websites about topics I already argued away and still don't support your central argument. And I quote "If a dream during REM sleep is very arousing, the sensation of an erect p***s pressed against a mattress can lead to erotic dreaming and ejaculation in guys." This has absolutely nothing to do with your supposed automatic ejaculation theory. Furthermore, rather then disprove any of my various proofs against you, you simply grasp at weak proofs as if hoping I'll get bored and stop disproving you. Oh and seriously? Planned Parenthood to prove a bio point? weak dude. My primary care provider, even though there's no risk of me becoming pregnant, might well have been Planned Parenthood. They're a perfectly legitimate medical practice and therefore know quite a bit about biology. I will admit, though, that they did simplify and make generalizations. However, I still sent it realizing it wasn't going to be read by someone who's scientifically literate. Although planned parenthood has many wonderful qualities and is an excellent help to many people there websites main points are all about sociological issues. It will explain in ways that are technically unscientific because they are not an educational facility. Are you male or female? Btw, I'm trained to read and dissect scientific articles thank you. I'll let you know when you connect me to a reliable one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:24 am
ScionoftheBlade Btw, I'm trained to read and dissect scientific articles thank you. I'll let you know when you connect me to a reliable one. Ad hom, this doesn't make you automatically reliable or correct. I'm trained in the Classics and I say that Leviticus has nothing to do with homosexuality due to context, but that doesn't change your mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:21 am
In Medias Res IV ScionoftheBlade Btw, I'm trained to read and dissect scientific articles thank you. I'll let you know when you connect me to a reliable one. Ad hom, this doesn't make you automatically reliable or correct. I'm trained in the Classics and I say that Leviticus has nothing to do with homosexuality due to context, but that doesn't change your mind. From a non-jewish perspective I can understand your reasoning. However, jewdiasm is largely based on something called "torah shel bal peh" or "the oral law." Oral law refers to everything except for the actual old testament. As such I follow Rashi as well as the Gemara that teaches me to understand the pasuk a specific way. Finally, a logical arguement smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:28 pm
Quote: Btw, I'm trained to read and dissect scientific articles thank you. I'll let you know when you connect me to a reliable one. Oh, PLEASE be so kind, sir. Or come to think of it, don't. A man who seems to think that not pissing is a reasonable substitute to drinking probably shouldn't be telling me which of my sources are reliable. Sorry. Now that that's out of the way, I'll continue. Quote: Although planned parenthood has many wonderful qualities and is an excellent help to many people there websites main points are all about sociological issues. Gornisht helfn. Thanks for proving that you've only done less than half your research. Planned parenthood is a medical practice. Yes, there are many stigmas which medical practices seek to eliminate for the health of their patients. Male, not that it matters. Planned Parenthood will take a male patient and treat him for things that have nothing to do with pregnancy or sex. It's a medical practice. Now, a note on oral law is that, for most of Judaism, that's EXACTLY what's subject to Maimonides' law. Oral law is imperfect, because it's not divine law. Therefore, science can debunk it like everything else. If science debunks it, that's no reason to just stop being a Jew. It just means you have to adjust your views on the Torah according to science. In conclusion, the best scientific data we have points to homosexuality being natural, abstinence being physically impossible and unhealthy and spirituality having nothing to do with it. Abstinence for homosexuals is supported, as it seems, under the impression that any part of the living body, much less the reproductive system, can just stop while the rest of the body continues to function in a proper and healthy manner. I guess that's science as taught in a Chabad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:41 pm
You know what? For a second I'll pretend you actually responded to any of proofs against you and I actually said as your claiming (Sorry I'm tiredof disproving everything you say.)
Ok finally you say something to validate your arguement, your a modern jew who doesn't follow the more religious beliefs and wants to retranslate things to make life easier. (in response to aligning torah to science, in gemarah it teaches either we misinterpreted nature or we had the torah wrong.) Did I argue against homosexuality being natural EVER? no. Did you bring one peice of evidence saying abstinence was impossible? no. (btw I only argued it as neccesary in few circumstances.) Unhealthy? omg it causes cancer! so does virtually everything else which no one payed other scientists to debunk. There;s a new study every month and no one benefits from disporving the study. (If you haven't learned how perform study's to get the results you want yet, I'm sorry maybe when your in college they'll teach it to you or I can recommend some great books.)
I"m not chabad and you haven't given a single proof that not orgasming isn't possible (you are changing your tone to merely abstinence, why is that?)
Bring a proof to actually support your argument or make up your mind if I'm catholic chabad or the next thing you come up with. I'll let you know when you get it right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:49 pm
What's wrong with Chabad?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:20 pm
hateyou the warlock What's wrong with Chabad? For those who have had the pleasure of experiencing just how amazing chabad can be absolutely nothing. Unfortunately chabad is often viewed as the "evangelicals" of the jewish world and therefor crazy. This stereotype is likely from the few actions of those dancing in Ben Yehuda (sorry but they were all high of there asses on ecstasy) and those who claim the Rebba is still alive. Sadly the extremes usually determine public perceptions, not the majorities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:43 pm
ScionoftheBlade In Medias Res IV ScionoftheBlade Btw, I'm trained to read and dissect scientific articles thank you. I'll let you know when you connect me to a reliable one. Ad hom, this doesn't make you automatically reliable or correct. I'm trained in the Classics and I say that Leviticus has nothing to do with homosexuality due to context, but that doesn't change your mind. From a non-jewish perspective I can understand your reasoning. However, jewdiasm is largely based on something called "torah shel bal peh" or "the oral law." Oral law refers to everything except for the actual old testament. As such I follow Rashi as well as the Gemara that teaches me to understand the pasuk a specific way. Finally, a logical arguement smile Nope. wrong. All rational Jews in their right minds can admit that the Torah has been changed. We just roll with what the Masorites said was what it was upposed to mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:43 pm
ScionoftheBlade hateyou the warlock What's wrong with Chabad? For those who have had the pleasure of experiencing just how amazing chabad can be absolutely nothing. Unfortunately chabad is often viewed as the "evangelicals" of the jewish world and therefor crazy. This stereotype is likely from the few actions of those dancing in Ben Yehuda (sorry but they were all high of there asses on ecstasy) and those who claim the Rebba is still alive. Sadly the extremes usually determine public perceptions, not the majorities. Except comparing them to Evangelical Christianity is absolutely wrong considering they are not out to convert anyone NOR do they think that non-Jews are going to hell as christians do. P.S. It's JUDAISM, not Jewdaism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:54 pm
...Everyone that I know who is Chabad knows the Rebbe is dead, may he receive his full reward in Gan Eden, and that the only reason that we have no current Rebbe is because he named Moshiach as his successor.
By the way, another group that has named Moshiach as their next Rebbe are the Breslov who have had no other Rebbe since Rebbe Nachman (who was their first Rebbe by the way.) He was born 4 April 1772 (Rosh Chodesh Nisan 5532)and he died 16 October 1810 (18 Tishrei 5571).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:41 pm
In Medias Res IV ScionoftheBlade hateyou the warlock What's wrong with Chabad? For those who have had the pleasure of experiencing just how amazing chabad can be absolutely nothing. Unfortunately chabad is often viewed as the "evangelicals" of the jewish world and therefor crazy. This stereotype is likely from the few actions of those dancing in Ben Yehuda (sorry but they were all high of there asses on ecstasy) and those who claim the Rebba is still alive. Sadly the extremes usually determine public perceptions, not the majorities. Except comparing them to Evangelical Christianity is absolutely wrong considering they are not out to convert anyone NOR do they think that non-Jews are going to hell as christians do. P.S. It's JUDAISM, not Jewdaism. The analogy was against the stereotype to my knowledge I realize it has no grounding in reality. Thanks for the correction on the spelling, I apologies in advance that I will likely forget it within two minutes. @hateyou- I know, however there is a minority within the chabad who believe he is mashiach and will rise again, same way there is a handful of some chassidus who were pro arab violence in Israel (I believe it was a sub-sect of Sotmer, but my memory isn't great)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
