|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:09 pm
Napoleon was 4'something. And actually... well, you'd probably only like him more for this. *shrug* He was making fun of the fact that Washington actually followed through on a promise to step down and not be President for Life. Somebody asked why Napoleon didn't follow through and step down, and he said, "What, you think I'm a Washington?" like Washington was an idiot for letting go of power.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:24 pm
Nope, Napoleon was 5.6, go ahead an' google. it. An' I'm sidin' with the emperor there, Washington was an idiot for lettin' go of power. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 2:47 pm
Ruby St.Claire Nope, Napoleon was 5.6, go ahead an' google. it. An' I'm sidin' with the emperor there, Washington was an idiot for lettin' go of power. xd eek
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:05 pm
Larrisa Talbot Ruby St.Claire Nope, Napoleon was 5.6, go ahead an' google. it. An' I'm sidin' with the emperor there, Washington was an idiot for lettin' go of power. xd eek ....cloud glitch.....couldn't resist.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:17 pm
Ruby St.Claire Nope, Napoleon was 5.6, go ahead an' google. it. An' I'm sidin' with the emperor there, Washington was an idiot for lettin' go of power. xd True, he was 5.6, and that was slightly above average height for males of that time period.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:01 pm
... stare Then why do they always talk about Napoleon being short? I'm confused, I could have sworn he was 4'something.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:38 pm
ArynChris ... stare Then why do they always talk about Napoleon being short? I'm confused, I could have sworn he was 4'something. It's a common misconception actually. It has to do with the French feet being slightly larger than the English feet. In French feet he was 5'2" but in English feet he was 5'6". I read it on a fancy website I did. 3nodding They said something about exhuming the body and stuffs. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:38 am
Yeah, cause the foot was the size of the King at that period, so therefore the french guy had bigger feet than the english king...or something xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:49 am
Ohhh... I get it now. Didn't know they hadn't standardized that yet.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:45 pm
ArynChris Ohhh... I get it now. Didn't know they hadn't standardized that yet. Yep....but it's all good, I had to google it to find these things out. xd So yeah, before the bonapartist thingy, I didn't know either.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:56 pm
You know, there's only one real problem with this feud...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:24 pm
ArynChris You know, there's only one real problem with this feud... What's that?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:49 pm
The preferred winners are the French. And that's just bad all around. xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:47 pm
ArynChris The preferred winners are the French. And that's just bad all around. xp O-O But Napolean.....*gasp*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:54 pm
rofl When it comes to Napoleon, I'll side with... No, GOD no, I will not reference a book I hate. I will not reference a book I hate. I will not reference a... *goes into a shuddering, horrible trancestate*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|