|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 9:41 pm
and in their own way the writers proved the Chlois theory true, if your take on what happened is right Elphie.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:05 pm
Ubriacone and in their own way the writers proved the Chlois theory true, if your take on what happened is right Elphie. Exactly! I think they did it to make the fans happy to some point. I don't think they had intended fans to fall so in love with the Chloe/Clark relationship 6 seasons ago and now they need a way to somehow incorporate her into his destiny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:54 am
If that's the writers' way of proving the Chlois theory true to make Chloe fans then they're stupid as well as lazy.
The ONLY reason there even is a Chlois theory is so that the character played by Allison Mack can hook up with Clark. And frankly I always thought it was kind of insulting to Mack that people would suggest Chloe isn't a cool enough character in her own right and has to usurp an established character's role to matter at all.
Either way, neither Lois fans nor Chloe fans, and especially not Lois and Chloe fans like me will be happy if it turns out Lois is now Chloe Sullivan in all but name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:55 pm
No no, it's not that Chloe is just in Lois's body. That makes no sense. If that was the case then why when Lois woke up did she address Chloe? If she WAS Chloe, she'd be asking more of the question "Why am I looking at my own body!?" My theory is that they are BOTH in Lois's body. That would make for a few really out there and sci fi episodes where they are fighting for control of the body and it will lead up to either either one wins out, Chloe goes back to her own body, or they learn to share and their personalities merge to form a new Lois Lane.
My money is on the merging one. It's so bizarre that they just might use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:41 am
If they do I'll be pissed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:21 pm
This is Ubriacone,
I'm kinda with FiF here. There is only one reason I fell in love with the Chlois theory and that is because I would love to see Chloe with Clark but know that Clark ends up with Lois. As soon as they introduced Lois to the series they all but squelched the possibility of Chlois. If Chlois comes to pass they will definitely piss off too many fans which makes it not worth it to do, actually they would probably piss off a good majority of te fans by doing that.
Thanks for listening!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:58 pm
I hope so, as I really want Clark and Chloe together.
and lana is annoying (almost as bad as Clana stare ) and I hope she is dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:47 am
Movieking09 [-Crystal__Light-] SaberFireTiger Chloe better not bring Lana back. How could she? lana gets blown up and wouldn't that well leave her like bones or somthing? But one person has to die and it can't be chloe she just got the new powers so i am sure they won't kick her off the show that quick lana doesn't die! when chloe uses her power she gives peices of her life away she cries to save lois she sacrifices her life for lois and she dies duh!
Well, could be worse. Smallville could be in Texas instead of Kansas, and Chloe could wake up in the morgue next to a certain cheerleader...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:06 am
...or worse, the episode could've taken place in a certain California town which sits over a Hellmouth, and the local Vampire Slayer could try to put a stake in her... twisted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:52 pm
godhi ...or worse, the episode could've taken place in a certain California town which sits over a Hellmouth, and the local Vampire Slayer could try to put a stake in her... twisted hahahahaha.... you think like me! Wouldn't it be awesome tho? The two greatest ever shows merging into one! Too bad Buffy's gone for good. cry *sniff*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 3:57 pm
The season premiere was kinda weird with Chloe being in the morg for like.. 2-5 minutes.. that was weird.. I expected Lana in there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:16 am
Zero-Yasha Chloe has Healing tears!!!!!!! man she's such a cry baby...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:57 am
FaithHopeLove godhi ...or worse, the episode could've taken place in a certain California town which sits over a Hellmouth, and the local Vampire Slayer could try to put a stake in her... twisted hahahahaha.... you think like me! Wouldn't it be awesome tho? The two greatest ever shows merging into one! Too bad Buffy's gone for good. cry *sniff*
I can picture Buffy staking a vampire, who just lies there twitching much like Peter Paul Reubens in the original film...
BUFFY: That's never happened before...
WILLOW: That's weird. Why didn't he explode into dust and stuff?
Of course, I'm also the person who wrote the fake Scooby Doo episode where the characters go to Innsmouth, Massachusetts; it's called...
Scooby Doo and Cthulhu, Too! twisted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:30 pm
Aside from her healing, she should be a techopath.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
