|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:12 am
Macinacs for seths its not logic that told me to say that...it was God. Heres the thing, I believe that the Lord almighty has talked to me, How do you know it was God talking to you? Honestly, what makes you think that it was God speaking to you? Macinacs for seths God made me to be attracted to men, hense it was God's Plan for me. God made me to be quick to hate, so it is God's plan for me. I am not taking any actions, I am just internally hating some people, and if God tells me to stop hating them, then I will. but until he does I will continue to hate them because it is Gods plan, and his plan overrides any verse in the great book! does that justify my hatred?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:43 am
Macinacs for seths Dear Dear Berezi, its not logic that told me to say that...it was God. Heres the thing, I believe that the Lord almighty has talked to me, just like he talks to all who believe. Because I have struggled with it for many years, I like the good christian I am, turned to God and said Lord, if it should be guide me know. Give me the knowledge I need. When God talks I do listen. When I asked him if i was suppose to be the way I am, he told me yes. When i asked him to take these feelings way, he told me i have a plan for you my child. Thats why even thought most will say that I havent heard Gods voice, I say I have, and He has commandth me so. If in the future he tells me to change, it will be by him that i am no more of a homosexual as others are. But until that call. I shall be what he has instructed me to be. I believe you when you say you heard God speak to you. Seriously, I do. If you heard God say you were supposed to be with a man, then I honestly can't quibble over that. But if all God said was that He had a plan for you that involves your sexuality in some way, without any details as to what it is, that could mean a whole gamut of things. If God has told you that you are to be with a man, then I will have to re-evaluate my understanding of the scripture since God doesn't contradict Himself. You cannot safely say that God gave you this orientation, therefore you were meant to act on it. I'm straight, but at the moment I don't think God means for me to be with anyone. I can't say that just because I'm straight and female, God has planned for me to marry a man. If God told me that marriage is part of the plan, then I can safely say that I am to marry a man. This is why I said I wondered about your logic.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:12 pm
Berezi Macinacs for seths Dear Dear Berezi, its not logic that told me to say that...it was God. Heres the thing, I believe that the Lord almighty has talked to me, just like he talks to all who believe. Because I have struggled with it for many years, I like the good christian I am, turned to God and said Lord, if it should be guide me know. Give me the knowledge I need. When God talks I do listen. When I asked him if i was suppose to be the way I am, he told me yes. When i asked him to take these feelings way, he told me i have a plan for you my child. Thats why even thought most will say that I havent heard Gods voice, I say I have, and He has commandth me so. If in the future he tells me to change, it will be by him that i am no more of a homosexual as others are. But until that call. I shall be what he has instructed me to be. I believe you when you say you heard God speak to you. Seriously, I do. If you heard God say you were supposed to be with a man, then I honestly can't quibble over that. But if all God said was that He had a plan for you that involves your sexuality in some way, without any details as to what it is, that could mean a whole gamut of things. If God has told you that you are to be with a man, then I will have to re-evaluate my understanding of the scripture since God doesn't contradict Himself. You cannot safely say that God gave you this orientation, therefore you were meant to act on it. I'm straight, but at the moment I don't think God means for me to be with anyone. I can't say that just because I'm straight and female, God has planned for me to marry a man. If God told me that marriage is part of the plan, then I can safely say that I am to marry a man. This is why I said I wondered about your logic. The great book was inspired by God but written by man. If God tells me to be what he wants me to be, then his direct word, the one he tells me, is what I as a christian am suppose to go by. Even if it counterdicts the written word of the Bible, if the Lord Almighty speaks, we are to follow. However, I will say one thing, I know that the devil can walk in the lambs cloaks. I know that I have to be careful not to be decived. That is why, when ever the Lord talks to me, I ask him to confirm his decision. By doing such, I'm not saying that i question his decision, but to reaffirm his decision. When i do ask for reaffirmation, i leave it to him. He will guide me. As of now, he has reaffirmed what he has told me. By bringing those into my life, and speaking to my heart as to what he wants, God reaffirms his plan. I hope this clarifies the "logic" behind what i have said. Praise be to the Almighty, for he is all-knowing and all-powerful.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:07 am
Macinacs for seths If God tells me to be what he wants me to be, then his direct word, the one he tells me, is what I as a christian am suppose to go by. Even if it counterdicts the written word of the Bible, if the Lord Almighty speaks, we are to follow. How about we follow some logic here: We know who God is because of what the Bible says… The Bible, though inspired by God, was written by men… Because it was written by men, God can contradict the Bible… If what we know of God is from the Bible, but God can contradict the Bible, what do we really know about God? NOTHING. I am not putting God in a box (saying that He must conform to the Bible), but if God did not give us an accurate Bible, then how can we trust that He is the God of the Bible? If we are not trusting the God of the Bible (A.K.A. The God of Abraham, The God of Israel, God the Father, etc.), then who is our god? Macinacs for seths As of now, he has reaffirmed what he has told me. By bringing those into my life, and speaking to my heart… So, you can trust that it is from God because of deceptive things (Mankind, Romans 16:17-18, and the heart, Jeremiah 17:9)? I am not saying that they always deceptive, but if there is no other authority to agree with them, then how can you trust them? "But the circumstances prove it was God that was involved." Well, Satan can also manipulate circumstance, like bring false witnesses into our lives so that we believe the lies that he's been telling us.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:54 pm
Seraph68 How about we follow some logic here: We know who God is because of what the Bible says… The Bible, though inspired by God, was written by men… Because it was written by men, God can contradict the Bible… If what we know of God is from the Bible, but God can contradict the Bible, what do we really know about God? NOTHING. Amen, Well written! So the way I understand things here, since God looked at Adam and Eve and said they were good, and he put it in them to want to eat from the tree, and they did just that, then God told them they sinned and punished them, God was wrong because he made them that way? And when Cain killed Abel, and God made Cain the way he was, and then punished him for killing Abel, God was wrong because he made Cain that way? And what about Sodom and Gamorah (sp?) He made all those people too. And that isn't just information from the Bible, that is found in secular history books. Why did Jesus tell the lame to walk, heal the blind, etc, weren't they all created by God to be that way? Oh, and, what do we do with the fact that God spoke, in an audible voice, to people like Moses? Moses was basically God's secretary in the old testament, God dictated the scriptures to Moses that speak about lieing with a man as with a woman. And Jesus himself spoke all the words I quoted way back there, I didn't use just words that were 'inspired.' Three people can speak to you, God, Satan, and yourself. The only way to know the difference is that God never contradicts himself. Go back to the original sin, Satan spoke to Eve, and said go ahead, it's ok, and he hasn't changed how he plays the game today. The Word of God is our sword of truth, anything that goes against what it says, is from Satan or yourself - not God.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:51 pm
Macinacs for seths The great book was inspired by God but written by man. All scripture is God-breathed. Discounting it isn't a good idea. Quote: If God tells me to be what he wants me to be, then his direct word, the one he tells me, is what I as a christian am suppose to go by. Even if it counterdicts the written word of the Bible, if the Lord Almighty speaks, we are to follow. Okay, God has told you He wants you to be gay. I am not attempting to quibble over that. I want to know how God wanting you to be gay = God wanting you to enter into a covenant with a man. You can't make that leap unless God said that, too. And so far, you haven't told me whether He did. Quote: However, I will say one thing, I know that the devil can walk in the lambs cloaks. I know that I have to be careful not to be decived. That is why, when ever the Lord talks to me, I ask him to confirm his decision. By doing such, I'm not saying that i question his decision, but to reaffirm his decision. When i do ask for reaffirmation, i leave it to him. He will guide me. As of now, he has reaffirmed what he has told me. By bringing those into my life, and speaking to my heart as to what he wants, God reaffirms his plan. I hope this clarifies the "logic" behind what i have said. Yes, it does. Quote: Praise be to the Almighty, for he is all-knowing and all-powerful. Amen! P.s. know that I'm speaking out of concern. The scriptures are God's word, so unless God specifically said something to us, we don't contradict the scriptures. Even the Law, which we are no longer bound by, still has much to say to us. And in the New Testament God fulfills the Old, He does not contradict it. So, if God specifically told you He plans for you to enter into a covenant with a man, then the parts of scripture that speak on homosexuality must be misunderstood, since God doesn't contradict Himself.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:40 am
smurfetee Seraph68 How about we follow some logic here: We know who God is because of what the Bible says… The Bible, though inspired by God, was written by men… Because it was written by men, God can contradict the Bible… If what we know of God is from the Bible, but God can contradict the Bible, what do we really know about God? NOTHING. Amen, Well written! And so we all agree. (It's what "amen" means.) Quote: So the way I understand things here, since God looked at Adam and Eve and said they were good, and he put it in them to want to eat from the tree, and they did just that, then God told them they sinned and punished them, God was wrong because he made them that way? God didn't make them that way. Satan tempted them into sin. Quote: And when Cain killed Abel, and God made Cain the way he was, and then punished him for killing Abel, God was wrong because he made Cain that way? God didn't make Cain "that way". Murder is an action, not a state of being. Quote: And what about Sodom and Gamorah (sp?) He made all those people too. And that isn't just information from the Bible, that is found in secular history books. Yes. He made them, and gradually they fell away from him, just as the Israelites would later do. However, Sodom went much farther along the path of degeneracy that the Israelites ever did. EDIT:: Ezekiel disagrees. Ezekiel 16:44-58 44 " 'Everyone who quotes proverbs will quote this proverb about you: "Like mother, like daughter." 45 You are a true daughter of your mother, who despised her husband and her children; and you are a true sister of your sisters, who despised their husbands and their children. Your mother was a Hittite and your father an Amorite. 46 Your older sister was Samaria, who lived to the north of you with her daughters; and your younger sister, who lived to the south of you with her daughters, was Sodom. 47 You not only walked in their ways and copied their detestable practices, but in all your ways you soon became more depraved than they. 48 As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, your sister Sodom and her daughters never did what you and your daughters have done. 49 " 'Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. 50 They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen. 51 Samaria did not commit half the sins you did. You have done more detestable things than they, and have made your sisters seem righteous by all these things you have done. 52 Bear your disgrace, for you have furnished some justification for your sisters. Because your sins were more vile than theirs, they appear more righteous than you. So then, be ashamed and bear your disgrace, for you have made your sisters appear righteous. 53 " 'However, I will restore the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters and of Samaria and her daughters, and your fortunes along with them, 54 so that you may bear your disgrace and be ashamed of all you have done in giving them comfort. 55 And your sisters, Sodom with her daughters and Samaria with her daughters, will return to what they were before; and you and your daughters will return to what you were before. 56 You would not even mention your sister Sodom in the day of your pride, 57 before your wickedness was uncovered. Even so, you are now scorned by the daughters of Edom [a] and all her neighbors and the daughters of the Philistines—all those around you who despise you. 58 You will bear the consequences of your lewdness and your detestable practices, declares the LORD. I stand corrected. Quote: Why did Jesus tell the lame to walk, heal the blind, etc, weren't they all created by God to be that way? No. Breaking/crushing your leg/disease can cause lameness, extreme heat/optical penetration/disease/malnutrition can cause blindness. In addition, Jesus performed miracles not only to help people, but also to show that he was indeed the son of God. However, saying "if you are the Son of God, heal me", is akin to what the devil says during Jesus's days of fasting in the desert. Quote: Oh, and, what do we do with the fact that God spoke, in an audible voice, to people like Moses? Moses was basically God's secretary in the old testament, God dictated the scriptures to Moses that speak about lieing with a man as with a woman. And Jesus himself spoke all the words I quoted way back there, I didn't use just words that were 'inspired.' For the first five books only. Also, Leviticus passages taken to pertain to homosexuality actually refer to male temple prostitution, a common pagan practice in the hebrew days. Quote: Three people can speak to you, God, Satan, and yourself. The only way to know the difference is that God never contradicts himself. Go back to the original sin, Satan spoke to Eve, and said go ahead, it's ok, and he hasn't changed how he plays the game today. The Word of God is our sword of truth, anything that goes against what it says, is from Satan or yourself - not God. Truly. Amen.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:31 pm
Okay, everyone has really good points, but as a baptist and gay, I must say that I have already talked to my youth minister, he said that the baptists have an old saying "once saved, always saved." I have asked christ into my life, i pray every night, i go to church (as much as i can.) in the bible it may say all that stuff, but it also says that if you ask jesus and god into your life, and truly ask for forgvness, and ask to be saved, there is no way you are going to miss out in eternal life. I also believe that over the years, christians have missread the bible, by that i mean we have took it and twisted it into what we think is right and wrong. and even if you say your the best christian, you are also guilty of this sin! i have also tlked to alot of my christian friends, they are from different religions (church of christ, methodist, baptist) and they all told me the same thing....you are not going to hell just because you god created you gay! and to all those people who ask gays why they are gay, then answer me why are you straight, your answer is going to be "because god made me this way," is it not, well mine is too. and to all those who are ant-homo and still acccept then in behalf of the whole gay community, you need to get a reality check, we're here and we're queer, and CHRISTIANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:40 pm
Hmm...I disagree with the 'once saved always saved' thing.
But first, as to not get totally off topic... I beleive that homosexuality is a sin. I do not believe that one is born tha way, and that it cannot be changed. I have heard countless stories of homosexuals getting saved and then have a restoration take place in their lives. Many of them are now happily married (in heterosexual marriages) and have families of their own, and they couldn't be more in love with their spouses.
On that note... I watched a sermon on tape by a preacher by the name of Micheal Rowan (he was at our district youth conference last May; he was really good and we decided we wanted to see this message in particular). It was called 'Who's holding the whip?' It was about the crucifixion of Jesus. Now, it was something I had thought about, but not quite in the way that we put it. The sermon is very graphic, due to the demonstrations he uses. He pulls out a whip that is called a flagellum. Basically it has many ends, the tips made with bone. This literally wraps around the skin and digs in, and when it is ripped away it takes the flesh with it. He was saying that they would have used this on Jesus.
So he goes on to ask 'Who's holding the whip?' the lights go out, and images of the crucifixion flash across the screan. Brutal images...no fluff here. The lights come on and there is a man tied to the stage, covered in blood (fake, obviously). Micheal Rowan then demonstrates on this man what it would have looked like. The picture is very real. Now, he goes on to explain the title. Jesus was whipped 39 times. But he goes on to say that it didn't stop there...it doesn't stop there. Every time on of His children intentionally sin, there goes the whip. He goes on to demonstrate it further.
I cannot effectively convey the feelings that ripped through me as I watched this. You'd have to see it for yourself. It's not that Jesus doesn't forgive us...but it's not like it doesn't hurt Him, either.
And what's my point? Someone who intentionally sins, knowing the consequences and does not repent, will not be 'perma-saved'. If I were to go to church my whole life then on my death bed renounce Christ, will I still make it there? I think not. My own uncle was saved for the majority of his life...I cannot say the same for him now. Salvation is a choice, and we can turn away from it. I don't recall the exact reference, but the Bible says something about how people who have known what it is like to live with God and have fallen away have a harder time coming back. People can fall away, it is not a 'get out of hell free' card.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:58 pm
x_Hikari_x I beleive that homosexuality is a sin. I do not believe that one is born tha way, and that it cannot be changed. I have heard countless stories of homosexuals getting saved and then have a restoration take place in their lives. Many of them are now happily married (in heterosexual marriages) and have families of their own, and they couldn't be more in love with their spouses. Yes, and I believe that acting on selfishness is a sin. However, that's something I've always struggled with and something I have a hard time changing. As I am nearer to God, I am less inclined to be selfish, but I am a selfish person through and through. Now, why do you believe that homosexuality is a sin? I know the scriptures don't really condone acting on homosexuality, but is being gay a sin, or is it acting on those desires? Quote: And what's my point? Someone who intentionally sins, knowing the consequences and does not repent, will not be 'perma-saved'. If I were to go to church my whole life then on my death bed renounce Christ, will I still make it there? I think not. My own uncle was saved for the majority of his life...I cannot say the same for him now. Salvation is a choice, and we can turn away from it. But God will pursue us. Eventually, God will let us go our own way, but that is His perogative, and it won't be without a fight.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:43 pm
The popular topic of homosexuality seems to draw more attention in the body than divorce or adultery. I'm not sure why that is, however it should not be kept silent either. The homosexual (relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex) violates what theologians called "Law of Nature." Nowadays, when we talk of the 'law of nature' we usually mean things like gravitation, or heredity, or the laws of chemistry. But when the olders thinkers called the Law of Right and Wrong 'the Law of Nature', they really meant the Law of Human Nature.
Paul has spoken about this Law of Nature in the Book of Romans. Gentiles did what was contrary to the Law of Nature. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature. Filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.
It is true that an authentic believer who does practice homosexuality has eternal life. However, the person would be excommunicated from the body because of sexual immorality (1 Cor 5). This person is to be delivered to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.
As for you Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori, "passages taken to pertain to homosexuality actually refer to male temple prostitution, a common pagan practice" does not reflect the text. Rather you are adding to the text, which is a no no, if you want to maintain the correct exegetical theology.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:59 pm
Im having a bit of trouble listening to people when they say that God has spoken to them. Now im not well versed in bible sayings, but wasnt it said after Jesus that there will be no prophets to be born? And being a prophet as i understand it is to be on a level with God to be able to understand him and preech the words God speaks to men. Thus the problem, no prophets are to be hear but you hear something talking to you. Then i understand that the Devil is well versed in the bible and is able to manipulate any understanding to bring people away from God. SO how do you know the difference. If what the words that are being said to you conform to the bible then it maybe God, or an angel. IF it contridicts then it isnt from heaven. Though the bible was written man it was God inspired. And God is infinite, and the bible was written by prophets and apostles. The best way to understand it is that God chooses how to manipulate the world of man. God told Moses to save his people from Egypt. God spoke through a burning bush to Moses. God also TALKED to Abraham. and so on. and through God'd words his will was accompllished. thus if God willed it, his word will last forever. Because the words came from God himself
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:05 pm
Berezi x_Hikari_x I beleive that homosexuality is a sin. I do not believe that one is born tha way, and that it cannot be changed. I have heard countless stories of homosexuals getting saved and then have a restoration take place in their lives. Many of them are now happily married (in heterosexual marriages) and have families of their own, and they couldn't be more in love with their spouses. Yes, and I believe that acting on selfishness is a sin. However, that's something I've always struggled with and something I have a hard time changing. As I am nearer to God, I am less inclined to be selfish, but I am a selfish person through and through. Now, why do you believe that homosexuality is a sin? I know the scriptures don't really condone acting on homosexuality, but is being gay a sin, or is it acting on those desires? THIS IS MY OPINION, im in training i guess you can call it, and if you wish it to be pursued pm me and i will do the research to get the biblical texts. BUT, when you get baptized it is a symbol to the world that you have chosen to follow Jesus Christ and to pick up your cross and follow him in to eternity. This means that though what you say is only words, your actions show what your heart is feeling. Now this is not to say that actions or works will save you NO. The works are a reaction to what has happened inside you. The works and actions are the proof to others of who you are following. And the works speak louder than any words, becouse from the over flow of the heart the mouth speaks. and i believe with that, that the body follows. (in short, if you take the word to the roots, and you follow Jesus whole heartly the intention to even think to do anything against the laws or rules or guidelines will seem "unright")
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:04 pm
You again? I thought Ananel had dispatched you. Anywho. Reformed Baptist The popular topic of homosexuality seems to draw more attention in the body than divorce or adultery. I'm not sure why that is, however it should not be kept silent either. It's because it's "different", and anything "different" is automatically bad. Quote: The homosexual (relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex) violates what theologians called "Law of Nature." Nowadays, when we talk of the 'law of nature' we usually mean things like gravitation, or heredity, or the laws of chemistry. But when the olders thinkers called the Law of Right and Wrong 'the Law of Nature', they really meant the Law of Human Nature. The people Romans refers to gave up the "natural way". In Roman times, homosexual relations were perfectly natural. In addition, the natural way could very easily mean the sexual orientation people were born with. Since heterosexuals were by far the majority, as always, Paul would of course have used heterosexuals in his example. Quote: Paul has spoken about this Law of Nature in the Book of Romans. Gentiles did what was contrary to the Law of Nature. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature. Filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They gave up God. That's the cause of their punishments. I really don't see what the problem is here. Quote: For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. See above. In addition, why is shameless automatically taken to mean sex in general? Is all heterosexual sex shameless? Quote: For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. It is true that an authentic believer who does practice homosexuality has eternal life. However, the person would be excommunicated from the body because of sexual immorality (1 Cor 5). This person is to be delivered to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. The flesh is destroyed anyways. I'm not sure where you're getting this from, scripture-wise. Quote: As for you Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori, "passages taken to pertain to homosexuality actually refer to male temple prostitution, a common pagan practice" does not reflect the text. Rather you are adding to the text, which is a no no, if you want to maintain the correct exegetical theology. Correct. I'm adding historical context to the text, in order to more accurately show it's original meaning. You, on the other hand, are adding a meaning it never had.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:47 pm
Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori You again? I thought Ananel had dispatched you. Anywho. Why are you keep bring up Ananel? Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori Reformed Baptist The homosexual (relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex) violates what theologians called "Law of Nature." Nowadays, when we talk of the 'law of nature' we usually mean things like gravitation, or heredity, or the laws of chemistry. But when the olders thinkers called the Law of Right and Wrong 'the Law of Nature', they really meant the Law of Human Nature. The people Romans refers to gave up the "natural way". In Roman times, homosexual relations were perfectly natural. In addition, the natural way could very easily mean the sexual orientation people were born with. Since heterosexuals were by far the majority, as always, Paul would of course have used heterosexuals in his example. You mean "perfectly common"? Show me a historical source that the Romans viewed homosexuality as "natural" and don't give me a modern article either. On the Biblical point, homosexuality is not part of the Law of Nature. Even God banned homosexuality in his Holy Law and I'm pretty sure bestiality is not natural either. Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori Reformed Baptist Paul has spoken about this Law of Nature in the Book of Romans. Gentiles did what was contrary to the Law of Nature. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature. Filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They gave up God. That's the cause of their punishments. I really don't see what the problem is here. There is no problem here. I was explaining the Law of Nature in depth. Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori Reformed Baptist For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. See above. In addition, why is shameless automatically taken to mean sex in general? Is all heterosexual sex shameless? You have missed the point. Romans 1:26-27 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori Reformed Baptist For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. It is true that an authentic believer who does practice homosexuality has eternal life. However, the person would be excommunicated from the body because of sexual immorality (1 Cor 5). This person is to be delivered to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. The flesh is destroyed anyways. I'm not sure where you're getting this from, scripture-wise. 1st Corinthians 5Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori Reformed Baptist As for you Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori, "passages taken to pertain to homosexuality actually refer to male temple prostitution, a common pagan practice" does not reflect the text. Rather you are adding to the text, which is a no no, if you want to maintain the correct exegetical theology. Correct. I'm adding historical context to the text, in order to more accurately show it's original meaning. You, on the other hand, are adding a meaning it never had. How do you know if your "additions" are correct? Another thing, where is your historical source? The problem here is that there is NO indication or text supporting male temple prostitution. Your argument is a bunch of air. Kuroi Kokoro no Mendori You, on the other hand, are adding a meaning it never had. Show me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|