|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:31 pm
You can try all you want but still be dead wrong. >_>;
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:32 pm
InternalHardDrive You can try all you want but still be dead wrong. >_>; Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:32 pm
InternalHardDrive You can try all you want but still be dead wrong. >_>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:35 pm
GAH, I give UP. This is pointless to debate when no one understands that I'm not for Bush, I'm just pointing out that he's working, and he's working hard. I understand that someone else could do better. I don't think that Kerry could and I don't think that Gore could. John Kerry has pushed most Republicans to the fact that if we make fun of him, who the ******** cares. He's using the fact that he was in the military as an excuse for everything and thinks that he's superior to Bush because he 'served' and Bush didn't.
Before I leave in disgust and probably lurk for a while, sneering at answers I have no right to sneer at, I'd just like to wonder how the hell I'm being argued with when I'm on the same side as you people. Is it because I'm the closest to opposition? Or is it because I showed pity for Bush?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:38 pm
Egotistical Moose GAH, I give UP. This is pointless to debate when no one understands that I'm not for Bush, I'm just pointing out that he's working, and he's working hard. I understand that someone else could do better. I don't think that Kerry could and I don't think that Gore could. John Kerry has pushed most Republicans to the fact that if we make fun of him, who the ******** cares. He's using the fact that he was in the military as an excuse for everything and thinks that he's superior to Bush because he 'served' and Bush didn't.
Before I leave in disgust and probably lurk for a while, sneering at answers I have no right to sneer at, I'd just like to wonder how the hell I'm being argued with when I'm on the same side as you people. Is it because I'm the closest to opposition? Or is it because I showed pity for Bush?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:41 pm
Magnius of the Chaos Egotistical Moose GAH, I give UP. This is pointless to debate when no one understands that I'm not for Bush, I'm just pointing out that he's working, and he's working hard. I understand that someone else could do better. I don't think that Kerry could and I don't think that Gore could. John Kerry has pushed most Republicans to the fact that if we make fun of him, who the ******** cares. He's using the fact that he was in the military as an excuse for everything and thinks that he's superior to Bush because he 'served' and Bush didn't.
Before I leave in disgust and probably lurk for a while, sneering at answers I have no right to sneer at, I'd just like to wonder how the hell I'm being argued with when I'm on the same side as you people. Is it because I'm the closest to opposition? Or is it because I showed pity for Bush? Because it's so bad to have hope that we can be mature? I WANT TO DISCUS BUSH AND IMPEACHMENT NOT DRAMAK?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:45 pm
This has nothing to do with anything, but...
I saw a "Psychic Madman" show tonight (Jim Karol, he was in Jackass 2). He predicted the Colts would face the Bears this Super Bowl a couple weeks ago, and he, apparently, can read minds. Anyway, he predicted Hilary Clinton would win in 2008 with Obama as her running mate.
Nothing to do with anything. (I don't think he's right.)
Anyway, I hate the View, Rosie's a b***h, and as much as I hate Bush, I don't think he will be impeached. He's covered his a** too well. ;_;'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:46 pm
XD
Obama. Funny man.
The only thing I remember Rosie from is the Donald Trump versus Rosie battle. That was freaking hilarious.
I'm not really fond of Rosie, but she makes pretty good points.
But either way, if I want politics made funny and mocked, I go to the Daily Show with Jon Stewart and the Colbert Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:52 pm
Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean removal of office, from what I gather... I still wish it would happen, though. >.>;;
I wish prince mongo would run for presidency in '08... xd D
If I could, I would definitely vote for him. 4laugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:54 pm
Mychryynrie Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean removal of office, from what I gather... I still wish it would happen, though. >.>;; I wish prince mongo would run for presidency in '08... xd D If I could, I would definitely vote for him. 4laugh Weren't you the pro-bush republican? I KNOW SOMEONE IN THE GUILD WAS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:56 pm
Padme Potter of Hobbiton Mychryynrie Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean removal of office, from what I gather... I still wish it would happen, though. >.>;; I wish prince mongo would run for presidency in '08... xd D If I could, I would definitely vote for him. 4laugh Weren't you the pro-bush republican? I KNOW SOMEONE IN THE GUILD WAS. No, I think Ret's Pro-Bush.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:58 pm
Padme Potter of Hobbiton Mychryynrie Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean removal of office, from what I gather... I still wish it would happen, though. >.>;; I wish prince mongo would run for presidency in '08... xd D If I could, I would definitely vote for him. 4laugh Weren't you the pro-bush republican? I KNOW SOMEONE IN THE GUILD WAS. If I could vote, I'd be a yellow dog democrat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:00 pm
Anael De Ezra Padme Potter of Hobbiton Mychryynrie Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean removal of office, from what I gather... I still wish it would happen, though. >.>;; I wish prince mongo would run for presidency in '08... xd D If I could, I would definitely vote for him. 4laugh Weren't you the pro-bush republican? I KNOW SOMEONE IN THE GUILD WAS. No, I think Ret's Pro-Bush. KK THANKS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:35 pm
Padme Potter of Hobbiton Cherry, having an affair isn't illegal. And we can't control what a president does once he's in office. We didn't know he'd do this. Oh, and I just did some research. Bush's highest approval rating since september was 45%. Lowest was 28%, and was on the 18th. The last two months average at about 33%. He wasn't impeached for having an affair, he was impeached for perjuring himself about the affair and obstructing justice.
To Impeach: To bring charges against a high-ranking official.
Thus the impeachment doesn't even bring the president at risk for losing office unless he is found guilty and then it is decided that that is to be his punishment.
I don't think Kerry or Gore would have handled things better, not at all. Sure, maybe we wouldn't be in a war now, but I think they'd have botched 9/11, and Saddam would still be a pain in everyone's a**. If nothing else, I am proud that we FINALLY went in there and finished what we started in 1990. Saddam was a monster and now he's finally gone.
About the US casualties in this war... let's do a comparison with WWII, shall we?
2GW: 4 Years
WWII: 3 Years
2GW: 3,000 Dead
WWII: 291,557 Dead
2GW: 22,951 Non-Mortally Wounded
WWII: 671,846 Non-Mortally Wounded
Now, you look at those numbers and tell me that we've lost alot of people in this war. Even IF you toss in the contractors and the other coalition forces' dead and wounded, it's STILL much less than our losses in WWII.
Also, he has the right to do as he pleases so long as it is legal, he has no obligation to do what the majority wants. It's a Democratic Republic which means we elect as a democracy (everyone gets a vote) representatives (republic style) who we hope will uphold our best interests, but once they're in office we can't make them do anything, and they can do what they want. Usually politicians don't just do as they please because they have to worry about being reelected, but Bush: A. Doesn't have that problem and B. Strongly believes in what he's doing.
Now then, about The View. It sucks. And about Rosie O'Donnel - She's an idiotic b***h who was once a popular host but lost what she once had and needs to drop eighty pounds, maybe more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:05 pm
Egotistical Moose GAH, I give UP. This is pointless to debate when no one understands that I'm not for Bush, I'm just pointing out that he's working, and he's working hard. I understand that someone else could do better. I don't think that Kerry could and I don't think that Gore could. John Kerry has pushed most Republicans to the fact that if we make fun of him, who the ******** cares. He's using the fact that he was in the military as an excuse for everything and thinks that he's superior to Bush because he 'served' and Bush didn't.
Before I leave in disgust and probably lurk for a while, sneering at answers I have no right to sneer at, I'd just like to wonder how the hell I'm being argued with when I'm on the same side as you people. Is it because I'm the closest to opposition? Or is it because I showed pity for Bush? Well, thing is, I'm aware that Bush is working hard, but in all honestly I don't believe that excuses him from anything since obviously Iraq has become a mess. ^^; Dukes: Plenty of presidents in the past had affairs, and Bush has lied quite a few times. (i.e. saying things like "we never said 'stay the course.'" Honestly, the whole thing with Clinton was pointless. What Saddam did wasn't right, but conditions in Iraq are honestly worse than they were. After we destroyed the infrastructure and failed to restore the country, Iraq has become more dangerous than it actually was. I agree that removing Saddam from power would be a good thing IF there was a clear exit plan that took into account the differnences in culture between theirs and ours. What's more, the Bush administration lied to the American people to get us to go into Iraq. They told us Iraq was tied to al Qaeda - that was false and they knew it. They told us Iraq had WMDs and was in the process of making nuclear weapons - they never found any. They told us Iraq was involved in 9/11 - false, as well. Did they know that? Yes. The Bush administration has constantly deceived America at large. So which is worse? Having an affair and lying about it or leading America into war based on false evidence when they KNEW it was false? As for statistics, that does not take into account the number of Iraqi citizens killed. Those numbers are quite significant. There were numerous cases of fraud in the 2000 and 2004 elections, and honestly I'm sure that Bush stole both elections. Besides, even though he has no obligation to do what the majority wants, it doesn't mean we want to sit back and watch him ruin an entire country. >>; Having only a 30% approval rate certainly says something. I'm personally not a fan of Rosie. ^^;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
