|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:37 pm
If I start a series in hardcover, I'll continue it in hardcover, but if I start a series in paperback I don't mind switching half way through to hardcover.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:46 pm
Hardcovers are nice but I actually prefer paperbacks. They're easier to carry around and easier to curl up in bed with. I do not discriminate with my books! rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:04 pm
I mainly buy paperback, usually due to lack of money, now if I really like a book or a series I'll try to find it in hardback and sell back the paperback version to a used bookstore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:31 pm
I have a lot of paperback books because they're less expensive and a lot more books are in paperback then in hardcover. Though I like the hardcover more because they don't wear down as much. I lug books all over the place and paperbacks have a tendicy to get really worn down and a few of my covers have actually fallen off. Hardbacks for me are much better but they're always, like $20 and I can never get as many books if I get a hard cover rather then a few paperbacks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:18 pm
well i wiould loooove to be able to buy only hardcover books... but the fact that im not rich makes it hard..... harcover books are Xpensive......but i do agree with the series books being the same... they must all have the same type of cover
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:10 pm
I do the exact same thing, to the letter. I buy hardcover when I can and take the paper cover off of it. I swear, if I could I would just buy them old school leather bound with just the title on the front and sides in fancy gold lettering. Ah, that would save me so many headachs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:33 am
arg i HATE the new georgia nicholson covers! and i only have half of them in the old covers it makes me mad! evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:40 am
Sorry but you are crazy ^^ smile I don't care about things like that at all if you can read it I wanna have it but thats me. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:13 pm
I actually prefer paperback. Hardcover books are more expensive and I find them harder to hold comfortably when curling up with a book. Paperbacks tend to be smaller, too. Another advantage.
Also, I like that creasing look in the binding of my paperbacks. It makes them look like they've been read (which they have) and just give them a lovely little worn look. I can't really explain it, but I love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 6:08 pm
Actually, I like paperbacks better. You see, when I'm reading a book, I like to take it with me EVERYWHERE, and this is kind of hard to do with a big hard cover.
On the other hand, hard covers usually have very pretty covers. You know that whole 'don't judge a book by it's cover thing'?
Rubbish. If I see a pretty cover, most likely I'll read it. And hard covers usually take a lot more time with the covers, and because they don't crease, they stay nicer for a longer time 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 7:18 am
Paperbacks are cheaper than hardcovers. But, hardcovers make good weapons twisted and an arm work out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
