|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 10:07 pm
Don't eat me!
Hehe, I wondered when d00x would chime in his "I DISAGREE" Remark. =3
...Please?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:34 am
[Cherry.Wine] Don't eat me!
Hehe, I wondered when d00x would chime in his "I DISAGREE" Remark. =3
...Please? Do you mind? Some of us are trying to be helpful here. -.-
And kindly refrain from calling me "D00x", "Doox" or any similar form of my name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:11 am
Dukes I am officially ashamed of you all...
Where has the plotting gone?
Where is the thinking things through?
Where is the ripping evidence apart checking for holes?
Where is what the game was all about?
I can't believe that I am the ONLY person here, and I'm DEAD to boot, who has thought about the phrasing there. Look at the PM Amigo posted.
Shikaku Ken asks Amigo if he got a PM, Amigo replies noncommittally leaving the question unanswered while asking Ken if he got one. Now, I don't know about ya'll, but if Amigo replied to me in that manner, I would be suspicious of him. Looks to me like Ken was suspicious as well and accused him of asking without answering because he was the sniper. Look at how it's phrased; "Yes Sniper..." is definately improper phrasing if you're admitting to something, you'd say "Yes, Sniper..." not "Yes Sniper..."
Please, someone, ANYONE, tell me I am not the only one to think this is possible.
Additionally, since when are PMs submittable as proof? I don't think any sort of screencap is really valid proof because of the ease with which one can be faked. But feel free to disagree.
///+ Buzz Bro... +///
I have to agree with you, it does seem a bit random that amigo would post this now...
There is no date or anything, and if she did ask it today it would be SUPER random and ilogical to ask some one aabout a placement pm on day 14.
///+ ...Orange+///
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:17 am
i agree with dukes.
sorry can't use caps logic etc... high on paint fumes... painting everywhere in the house... lawl
waa sorry i'm balbbering o-o
but yeah i agree with dukes.
mooooo
i say orin-kun is the sniper, still
kinda cuz it would be funny if my boyfriend was the sniper xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:33 am
It's real but sent yesterday. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:49 am
Yes, Ken received a PM about the Sniper Game. Recently.
As did everyone who was on the verge of going inactive. It was a reminder to those who may have forgotten about the game, or thought they were inactive already but weren't. You may have noticed several players who were on the verge of inactivity suddenly playing again. That is because of this.
Dukez: The depth to which people scrutinize information is to be decided by them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:14 am
I say we should jail Amigo now since this makes him suspicious. 3nodding
XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:30 am
Takazawa Dukez: The depth to which people scrutinize information is to be decided by them. Takazawa I am quite bloody aware of that fact. But my point is that I am ashamed of how the game is evolving in general. Back when I joined the Sniper Game, there would be a new theory every hour (Please don't pick that a part, I don't mean literally one per hour, it's meant for emphasis.), people would randomly accuse people of being suspicious for the fun of it, people would put effort into actually playing the game. There would be accusations made on no evidence at all, or on a ton of evidence, it didn't matter. But I see the way things were dying, actually they're on life support now, nobody puts effort into the game anymore. How do people get voted to jail now? Oddly enough, it's usually a person among the first five people to be voted for. I don't know about you, but that's just boring to me, hell, I don't know why people bother playing anymore if they're going to vote like that, unless they just sign up hoping they get a position in which case they will play the way everyone used to. Yeah, we had our share of people who didn't give a ******** way back when too, but it was never ever on this scale. I'm scared for the game, really I am. I'm afraid that by game 13 or 14 EVERYONE will be voting for the same person based on whatever the first poster decides is a good reason. Sheeping has always been a part of the game, but it used to take effort to pull it off, now it's so ******** easy I sheeped myself the first round with a single post. We need more theories popping up, giving people variety on who to sheep. We need more people parting from the pack and forging their own paths through the lands of votes, accusing their own choices, not following along like a puppy. My apologies but that's how I see this, if you don't like it, tough cookies.
I don't know if I am the only person who notices this, hell maybe it's just me and I'm a weird person imagining it, but what do I know. -.-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:10 am
Don't eat me!
I just love how Dukes (spelled right just for you ;D) Picks out one sentence and manages to argue with it for a whole paragraph. Anyway, it wasn't Ken, so who's next?
...Please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:54 am
I agree with most of what Dukes has to say on this one. You could see it with how people were voting in the last couple of games. "Sheep" were based on who the person above voted for, and that's not a sheep vote. It's blind vote following blind vote. Sheeping is making a thread, showing "proof" and reasons why their guilty and should be jailed.
But one reason so many people went inactive this game was the timing. Holiday and event time is the worst time to start a game, because for one thing everyone is already busy with holiday related stuff so the game takes a back seat. Next thing was this game just suddenly started without so much of an announcement. Most people didn't know the game had even begun until it was mentioned in the event hangout thread, and that was only for those who spent time there.
There are a lot of things adding on to why people aren't putting much effort into this game. I think after this game the guild should try to figure out what they want in a game and what would make them interested in it so it doesn't die out.
And I was serious about sheeping Amigo. Making evidence then getting a random GCDer jailed makes one suspicious and therefore more likely to be jailed. All part of the game. ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:01 pm
///+ Buzz Bro... +///
It does bug me when I always see 3-4 people say they are too lazy to think. =/
Me, I was on vacation for more then half of this game and had buzz vote for me.
///+ ...Orange+///
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:09 pm
Insomnesiac I agree with most of what Dukes has to say on this one. You could see it with how people were voting in the last couple of games. "Sheep" were based on who the person above voted for, and that's not a sheep vote. It's blind vote following blind vote. Sheeping is making a thread, showing "proof" and reasons why their guilty and should be jailed. But one reason so many people went inactive this game was the timing. Holiday and event time is the worst time to start a game, because for one thing everyone is already busy with holiday related stuff so the game takes a back seat. Next thing was this game just suddenly started without so much of an announcement. Most people didn't know the game had even begun until it was mentioned in the event hangout thread, and that was only for those who spent time there. There are a lot of things adding on to why people aren't putting much effort into this game. I think after this game the guild should try to figure out what they want in a game and what would make them interested in it so it doesn't die out. And I was serious about sheeping Amigo. Making evidence then getting a random GCDer jailed makes one suspicious and therefore more likely to be jailed. All part of the game. ^^ Amigo has been in jail for a while...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:21 pm
FortenraAskasa Insomnesiac I agree with most of what Dukes has to say on this one. You could see it with how people were voting in the last couple of games. "Sheep" were based on who the person above voted for, and that's not a sheep vote. It's blind vote following blind vote. Sheeping is making a thread, showing "proof" and reasons why their guilty and should be jailed. But one reason so many people went inactive this game was the timing. Holiday and event time is the worst time to start a game, because for one thing everyone is already busy with holiday related stuff so the game takes a back seat. Next thing was this game just suddenly started without so much of an announcement. Most people didn't know the game had even begun until it was mentioned in the event hangout thread, and that was only for those who spent time there. There are a lot of things adding on to why people aren't putting much effort into this game. I think after this game the guild should try to figure out what they want in a game and what would make them interested in it so it doesn't die out. And I was serious about sheeping Amigo. Making evidence then getting a random GCDer jailed makes one suspicious and therefore more likely to be jailed. All part of the game. ^^ Amigo has been in jail for a while...
Haha, rofl That's funny. A whole rant about how people don't pay attention during the game, then proof that she really hasn't either. I personally think that this was a good "sheep" thread.
...Please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:43 pm
I have no idea what everyone else is doing, but I vote for people based on clues and my interpretation of them; very rarely do I vote for someone just because everyone else is. Anyway, I think the problem is a combination between laziness and a lack of interest. When you're forced to vote everyday, it's tempting to just pick who everyone else is voting for simply because it saves time and brain cells.
As for lack of interest, admit it: the usual formula of the sniper game is beginning to get stale. We vote everyday, wait for a story update to see who died, and then receive clues. We've done this for 10 games already, and for most of us who have been around for a long time, it's getting a bit boring. I know a lot of people here dislike change, but think about it: without it, people will continue to drift away. That's why I'm all for new GMs changing the rules and the gameplay.
Also, the term 'sheeping' hasn't been used right for the longest time xd . Sheeping isn't just voting for a person just because they're the one with the most votes. Sheeping is what I did to Vlad. I accused him, told people to vote for him, and I gave solid reasoning as to why (it doesn't even need to be solid either, you can just make it up XD ). And lo and behold, Vlad's in jail (even though my suspicions were wrong). THAT is how you sheep someone. I mean, c'mon; it didn't take me even half an hour to do all that.
Come on, people! Where's the creativity?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:10 pm
[Cherry.Wine] Don't eat me!
I just love how Dukes (spelled right just for you ;D) Picks out one sentence and manages to argue with it for a whole paragraph. Anyway, it wasn't Ken, so who's next?
...Please? Yeah, seeing as it was the ONLY sentence directed towards myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
