Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Art Fags
Gouache anyone? Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Dr. Valentine
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:29 pm


Fine, I'm going to go on record and say that anime should only be produced on computers then. That is not what I meant to begin with, but it is now.

Actually, anime should not be produced at all. It's garbage.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:31 pm


Dr. Valentine
Velderia
Dr. Valentine
Traditional media + anime = gonk

IMHO
That's like almost saying "Traditional media + Azian = suxx0rs".

Where have you been?
It's almost like I'm saying that except that I'm not saying anything even tangentally similar.

Anime is mostly devoid of subtlty. That is really one of it's defining qualities - it's exaggerated, extreme, super-saturated, super shiney. It's a style that prioritizes the idea of being easily produced and eye-catching.

Traditional media is great because of the subtleties. Texture, brushstrokes, and technique all show through. It's strongest advantages are actively in opposition of what anime is about.

I'm sorry If I stepped on an entire continent's only form of artistic expression there, I didn't realise what a huge ******** bigot I am.

Where have I been?
Yeah Mr. Bigot. Stop bigoting it up.

But seriously: You are right 100%. When you try to do anime in a style unlike anime in every way, and without losing anything that makes anime what it is- a simple form- you are really just bringing out the lack of details anime has.

GARTS!

THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART

6,550 Points
  • First step to fame 200
  • Megathread 100
  • Mark Twain 100

THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART

6,550 Points
  • First step to fame 200
  • Megathread 100
  • Mark Twain 100
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:33 pm


ekirei
Traditional media includes pencil, pen, crayons, colored pencils etcetera. So basically you are saying you should only draw anime on the computer. That's pretty lame, since I think it's harder to draw traditional than CG. It takes more talent to mix your own colors.
The talent you use to mix colors would be more usefull if you attached them to good things. With details, and style mayhaps.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:43 pm


:w-hat:

METAPHOR FISTS
Captain


crazy spork i am

PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:34 pm


Dr. Valentine
Velderia
Dr. Valentine
Traditional media + anime = gonk

IMHO
That's like almost saying "Traditional media + Azian = suxx0rs".

Where have you been?
It's almost like I'm saying that except that I'm not saying anything even tangentally similar.

Anime is mostly devoid of subtlty. That is really one of it's defining qualities - it's exaggerated, extreme, super-saturated, super shiney. It's a style that prioritizes the idea of being easily produced and eye-catching.

Traditional media is great because of the subtleties. Texture, brushstrokes, and technique all show through. It's strongest advantages are actively in opposition of what anime is about.

I'm sorry If I stepped on an entire continent's only form of artistic expression there, I didn't realise what a huge ******** bigot I am.



if you're talking about anime as a style, i think it's certainly possible to execute it with traditional media and come up with something unique and full of expression. sure, the stereotype is to use thin clean lines, minimal detail, maximum appeal to the broadest audience, bright, pleasant colors, etc. that doesn't mean it can't be taken in a positive direction elsewhere. i know exactly what you're getting at, and there is a lot of truth in that, but that doesn't mean it's time to write off anime forever, and it doesn't mean that there aren't things from anime that we can extract and use to our advantage.

one might say something similar about american-produced syndicated cartoons (some feature films too, land before time XVIII or whatever they're on now comes to mind). most of them are created for the money and not for the art, with the goal of telling a predictable, inane story with cheap gags around every corner and selling a bunch of dvds to antsy children in grocery store checkout stands. when profit is the primary goal, you're almost destined to end up with crap.

however, that doesn't totally exclude either japanese or american produced animation from the possibility of creating something unique, worthwhile, expressive, beautiful, shocking, artistic, or whatever.

i think a lot of people might feel something like this as they mature, realizing the childishness, repetition, and predictability of something like anime. most would probably just stop watching it and consider it the end of a phase of something they liked. dedicated artists who have 'studied' anime are probably more aware of it and might feel repulsed by it.

but as i said, i don't think it's completely without its merits. as in any style, there are things that are important to it and things that it ignores. for example, you won't see many sharp angular lines or blaring contrasts in art nouveau, you won't see realistic perspective and rendering in cubism, nor would you see any nice clean lines in impressionism or any fantastic embellishments in realism. however, they're all respected styles, and each has it's own level of appeal to different people. i suppose you might say much anime is a form of idealism, an attempt to create the closest possible look to the ideals of beauty.

i personally believe that it's possible to combine that sense of idealism and broad appeal with the expressive textures and tones of traditional media.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:00 pm


Ah, this is why I love this guild.

crying ;

METAPHOR FISTS
Captain


THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART

6,550 Points
  • First step to fame 200
  • Megathread 100
  • Mark Twain 100
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:48 pm


crazy spork i am
Dr. Valentine
Velderia
Dr. Valentine
Traditional media + anime = gonk

IMHO
That's like almost saying "Traditional media + Azian = suxx0rs".

Where have you been?
It's almost like I'm saying that except that I'm not saying anything even tangentally similar.

Anime is mostly devoid of subtlty. That is really one of it's defining qualities - it's exaggerated, extreme, super-saturated, super shiney. It's a style that prioritizes the idea of being easily produced and eye-catching.

Traditional media is great because of the subtleties. Texture, brushstrokes, and technique all show through. It's strongest advantages are actively in opposition of what anime is about.

I'm sorry If I stepped on an entire continent's only form of artistic expression there, I didn't realise what a huge ******** bigot I am.



if you're talking about anime as a style, i think it's certainly possible to execute it with traditional media and come up with something unique and full of expression. sure, the stereotype is to use thin clean lines, minimal detail, maximum appeal to the broadest audience, bright, pleasant colors, etc. that doesn't mean it can't be taken in a positive direction elsewhere. i know exactly what you're getting at, and there is a lot of truth in that, but that doesn't mean it's time to write off anime forever, and it doesn't mean that there aren't things from anime that we can extract and use to our advantage.

one might say something similar about american-produced syndicated cartoons (some feature films too, land before time XVIII or whatever they're on now comes to mind). most of them are created for the money and not for the art, with the goal of telling a predictable, inane story with cheap gags around every corner and selling a bunch of dvds to antsy children in grocery store checkout stands. when profit is the primary goal, you're almost destined to end up with crap.

however, that doesn't totally exclude either japanese or american produced animation from the possibility of creating something unique, worthwhile, expressive, beautiful, shocking, artistic, or whatever.

i think a lot of people might feel something like this as they mature, realizing the childishness, repetition, and predictability of something like anime. most would probably just stop watching it and consider it the end of a phase of something they liked. dedicated artists who have 'studied' anime are probably more aware of it and might feel repulsed by it.

but as i said, i don't think it's completely without its merits. as in any style, there are things that are important to it and things that it ignores. for example, you won't see many sharp angular lines or blaring contrasts in art nouveau, you won't see realistic perspective and rendering in cubism, nor would you see any nice clean lines in impressionism or any fantastic embellishments in realism. however, they're all respected styles, and each has it's own level of appeal to different people. i suppose you might say much anime is a form of idealism, an attempt to create the closest possible look to the ideals of beauty.

i personally believe that it's possible to combine that sense of idealism and broad appeal with the expressive textures and tones of traditional media.
I mostly agree with you- except I think if you took SOME aspects of anime, and added them to a picture that doesn't suck, it's not really anime anymore. If after you take traditional media- and mix it with "anime" you still have "anime", then it's gonna be bad news. If you can fit some good aspects of anime into your traditional media- and make a stylish awesome-thingy, then bravo, and grats for making art that is no longer "anime".
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 3:09 pm


wow. I don't think i've ever made a post that spurred a debate. I'm impressed.

Jadie


crazy spork i am

PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 3:12 pm


THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
I mostly agree with you- except I think if you took SOME aspects of anime, and added them to a picture that doesn't suck, it's not really anime anymore. If after you take traditional media- and mix it with "anime" you still have "anime", then it's gonna be bad news. If you can fit some good aspects of anime into your traditional media- and make a stylish awesome-thingy, then bravo, and grats for making art that is no longer "anime".


i think in this case a very clear definition of "anime" is needed. from what you said, it sounds like you're using the term to describe everything you dislike about it, and that it's mutually exclusive with any kind of traditional media.

in your comment, you implied that you agree that there are some good aspects of anime that can be extracted, emphasized, or mixed with other styles and/or media. but it doesn't make a lot of sense to say that anything anime inherently sucks but at the same time has good qualities.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:33 pm


crazy spork i am
THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
I mostly agree with you- except I think if you took SOME aspects of anime, and added them to a picture that doesn't suck, it's not really anime anymore. If after you take traditional media- and mix it with "anime" you still have "anime", then it's gonna be bad news. If you can fit some good aspects of anime into your traditional media- and make a stylish awesome-thingy, then bravo, and grats for making art that is no longer "anime".


i think in this case a very clear definition of "anime" is needed. from what you said, it sounds like you're using the term to describe everything you dislike about it, and that it's mutually exclusive with any kind of traditional media.

in your comment, you implied that you agree that there are some good aspects of anime that can be extracted, emphasized, or mixed with other styles and/or media. but it doesn't make a lot of sense to say that anything anime inherently sucks but at the same time has good qualities.
Yes it does. It makes perfect sense . Eggs are good, but can be used to make bad cake. You see?

Anime, or the anime artist rather, may do good things to his art, but never make a good picture. I am sure you can think of some examples of this. Like bad line art that is colored really well. Still a bad picture, but executed well. Anime is exactly like that. The artist might be good, but make dumb pictures by drawing in a traditional anime style. I am saying if you take key aspects, but not all of them, you can have the well executed picture, but maybe with good line art. You might be able to cover the bad 75% of anime with another style.

THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART

6,550 Points
  • First step to fame 200
  • Megathread 100
  • Mark Twain 100

crazy spork i am

PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:32 pm


THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
crazy spork i am
THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
I mostly agree with you- except I think if you took SOME aspects of anime, and added them to a picture that doesn't suck, it's not really anime anymore. If after you take traditional media- and mix it with "anime" you still have "anime", then it's gonna be bad news. If you can fit some good aspects of anime into your traditional media- and make a stylish awesome-thingy, then bravo, and grats for making art that is no longer "anime".


i think in this case a very clear definition of "anime" is needed. from what you said, it sounds like you're using the term to describe everything you dislike about it, and that it's mutually exclusive with any kind of traditional media.

in your comment, you implied that you agree that there are some good aspects of anime that can be extracted, emphasized, or mixed with other styles and/or media. but it doesn't make a lot of sense to say that anything anime inherently sucks but at the same time has good qualities.
Yes it does. It makes perfect sense . Eggs are good, but can be used to make bad cake. You see?

Anime, or the anime artist rather, may do good things to his art, but never make a good picture. I am sure you can think of some examples of this. Like bad line art that is colored really well. Still a bad picture, but executed well. Anime is exactly like that. The artist might be good, but make dumb pictures by drawing in a traditional anime style. I am saying if you take key aspects, but not all of them, you can have the well executed picture, but maybe with good line art. You might be able to cover the bad 75% of anime with another style.


THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
Yes it does. It makes perfect sense . Eggs are good, but can be used to make bad cake. You see?


so your analogy is that anime is like bad cake, but the raw ingredients that make up anime, like eggs to cake, can be used to make something else good. i still think this is in need of a clear definition about what anime is, maybe some thought about what those raw ingredients represent, and a less biased black & white, good & bad outlook towards it.

THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
Like bad line art that is colored really well. Still a bad picture, but executed well.


i think of anime more as a style than a specific technique. line art and coloring are not techniques specific to anime, so stating those techniques in the context of extraction or influence from anime can only apply to the specific line art and coloring styles common to it. styles which, by your definition (so far), are inherently bad.

to put it another way, if you're comparing coloring and line art to eggs and flour, then those are general techniques used in many styles of art, just as eggs and flour are ingredients that can be used to cook many tasty foods. just because they're used in bad cake doesn't mean that they're ideas specifically extracted from it and used in other recipes, which is what i think a thoughtful artist (or chef) can do: isolate the essence of what makes something appealing (or delicious) and use it to his advantage. so i think it's possible to come away from anime with some of the essences of its appeal and create something new, fresh, and attractive without being another copy of the same cheezeball popular style.

imo, saying that one is "covering up the anime" with another style represents a negative mindset. and in my experience, blind negativity and criticism (as opposed to open-mindedness) has a very detrimental effect on creativity. that's not to say that you shouldn't be critical about any artwork you see. in fact, i think it's essential to remain critical. but the flipside to that, as there is to everything, is to keep it balanced with an open-mindedness and look for even the possibility of something good in there, which is much different from just writing off an entire style because 75% of it isn't to your liking. i'd say a style that still has 25% of appeal to you is worth at least some thought.

anyway, i really think we need a clear definition here. i want to know if you would consider artists like katsuya terada, stanley lau (artgerm) or anyone else in imaginary friends network for that matter, or directors like miyazaki or satoshi kon part of that definition.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:12 pm


How about.... to each his own, art is how you make it, yadda yadda, who the hell cares.

Less time debating, more time drawing plz

ragweed


Jadie

PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:16 pm


ragweed
How about.... to each his own, art is how you make it, yadda yadda, who the hell cares.

Less time debating, more time drawing plz
Taboo is that you?

Had i known that posting that little painting was going to escalate into this dead horse i wouldn't have posted. Quite frankly i don't think i draw/paint/whatever in anime style, i was just trying to make her face look more like my avatar.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:32 pm


crazy spork i am
THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
crazy spork i am
THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
I mostly agree with you- except I think if you took SOME aspects of anime, and added them to a picture that doesn't suck, it's not really anime anymore. If after you take traditional media- and mix it with "anime" you still have "anime", then it's gonna be bad news. If you can fit some good aspects of anime into your traditional media- and make a stylish awesome-thingy, then bravo, and grats for making art that is no longer "anime".


i think in this case a very clear definition of "anime" is needed. from what you said, it sounds like you're using the term to describe everything you dislike about it, and that it's mutually exclusive with any kind of traditional media.

in your comment, you implied that you agree that there are some good aspects of anime that can be extracted, emphasized, or mixed with other styles and/or media. but it doesn't make a lot of sense to say that anything anime inherently sucks but at the same time has good qualities.
Yes it does. It makes perfect sense . Eggs are good, but can be used to make bad cake. You see?

Anime, or the anime artist rather, may do good things to his art, but never make a good picture. I am sure you can think of some examples of this. Like bad line art that is colored really well. Still a bad picture, but executed well. Anime is exactly like that. The artist might be good, but make dumb pictures by drawing in a traditional anime style. I am saying if you take key aspects, but not all of them, you can have the well executed picture, but maybe with good line art. You might be able to cover the bad 75% of anime with another style.


THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
Yes it does. It makes perfect sense . Eggs are good, but can be used to make bad cake. You see?


so your analogy is that anime is like bad cake, but the raw ingredients that make up anime, like eggs to cake, can be used to make something else good. i still think this is in need of a clear definition about what anime is, maybe some thought about what those raw ingredients represent, and a less biased black & white, good & bad outlook towards it.

THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART
Like bad line art that is colored really well. Still a bad picture, but executed well.


i think of anime more as a style than a specific technique. line art and coloring are not techniques specific to anime, so stating those techniques in the context of extraction or influence from anime can only apply to the specific line art and coloring styles common to it. styles which, by your definition (so far), are inherently bad.

to put it another way, if you're comparing coloring and line art to eggs and flour, then those are general techniques used in many styles of art, just as eggs and flour are ingredients that can be used to cook many tasty foods. just because they're used in bad cake doesn't mean that they're ideas specifically extracted from it and used in other recipes, which is what i think a thoughtful artist (or chef) can do: isolate the essence of what makes something appealing (or delicious) and use it to his advantage. so i think it's possible to come away from anime with some of the essences of its appeal and create something new, fresh, and attractive without being another copy of the same cheezeball popular style.

imo, saying that one is "covering up the anime" with another style represents a negative mindset. and in my experience, blind negativity and criticism (as opposed to open-mindedness) has a very detrimental effect on creativity. that's not to say that you shouldn't be critical about any artwork you see. in fact, i think it's essential to remain critical. but the flipside to that, as there is to everything, is to keep it balanced with an open-mindedness and look for even the possibility of something good in there, which is much different from just writing off an entire style because 75% of it isn't to your liking. i'd say a style that still has 25% of appeal to you is worth at least some thought.

anyway, i really think we need a clear definition here. i want to know if you would consider artists like katsuya terada, stanley lau (artgerm) or anyone else in imaginary friends network for that matter, or directors like miyazaki or satoshi kon part of that definition.


Well I would read more of what your saying, but instead I am just gonna point out that you are using my sentences out of context- and you should probably read through more then one sentence, so my point isn't completely lost.

But that's beside the point.

ANIME BAD. HAS GOOD PARTS. USE GOOD PARTS, NOT BAD PARTS. DON'T USE BAD PARTS, WITHOUT USING MORE GOOD PARTS. THXU

THIS NAME IS QUITE SMART

6,550 Points
  • First step to fame 200
  • Megathread 100
  • Mark Twain 100

Dr. Valentine
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:34 pm


ragweed
How about.... to each his own, art is how you make it, yadda yadda, who the hell cares.

Less time debating, more time drawing plz
haha live and let live

no ******** way

eat my opinions or die
Reply
Art Fags

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum