|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:59 pm
PoeticVengeance I feel your pain. I actually put together a jpeg with the definitions that come up the most.  you are free to steal it, just make sure you credit it to TheFiresOfStupid. ^_^ The evolution one only hits on speciation, you should sure to mention that evolution doesn't need to result in the formation of a new species, it just can do so and oftentimes it does eventually. That's good, and simple enough for almost anyone to understand it...hopefully.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:47 pm
Lethkhar That's good, and simple enough for almost anyone to understand it...hopefully. Its also in pretty blue colors, so even little children can understand it. ^_^ I can't make any promises for creationists though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:10 pm
Sanguvixen Three: "Creationist Scientists" are obviously on drugs when they write and draft out thier reports. Thier ideas go so far into the realm of fantasy, and back again. (I can't prove the drug part it but that is my honest opinion) Actually, I believe it meets all requirements of a theory. It explains a phenomenon, and it can be used to predict future occurences. Yup, if I were you, I would totally call the "Moral High(-as-a-kite) Ground" theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:55 am
DivideByZero14 Sanguvixen Three: "Creationist Scientists" are obviously on drugs when they write and draft out thier reports. Thier ideas go so far into the realm of fantasy, and back again. (I can't prove the drug part it but that is my honest opinion) Actually, I believe it meets all requirements of a theory. It explains a phenomenon, and it can be used to predict future occurences. Yup, if I were you, I would totally call the "Moral High(-as-a-kite) Ground" theory. ;laughs; I love that! You just made my day! That is so funny! heart
I think I'll call it that too.
A new theory than!
What is with the blatent stupidity? The idiocy? The lack of knowledge, and logic that Creationists have?
There is a theory! It is called the "Moral High(-as-a-kite) Ground"(Name thought up by Divide by Zero14) theory that postulates that Creationist Scientists are under the influence of mind altering drugs when they are attempting to explore ways to validate thier ideas. Their minds leave the ground (not to be taken literally) and take great flights into drug induced fantasy lands.
The theory states that because they are so high, and thier minds are stuck in the realm of fantasy, they will continue to make illogical fantasy claims that have no basis in reality, and have no actual evidences, or proofs, to back them up.
Now what supports this theory? Oh yes! Many "Creationist Scientists" claim that because the world is only 6000 years old, Dinosaurs, and Humans lived together at one point and time.
Where is the evidence? The proofs? Well there is none. So what could be the cause of such an outlandish claim? Well if one were to believe the Moral High(-as-a-kite) Ground Theory one could assume the following:
"While in thier drug induced fantasy lands, the Creationist Scientists visited such a world where humans and dinosaurs lived together, and they drank rum with pirates, and flew on the backs of winged dragons!"
"However, when the effects of the Drugs wore off, their minds returned to the ground(A term for normal), and the Creationist Scientists became convinced that they had witnessed the past, and thus came up with the off the wall idea that Dinosaurs and Humans once lived together, and that Earth is only 6000 years old."
I know I am pulling this stuff out of my a**, but what do you think? Cute?
I made a thread in the GD about the above: http://www.gaiaonline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?page=1&t=18095257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
