|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:14 pm
Little girls cant get pregnant until they go through puberty. Until that first egg is released. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am. And since the first egg is released, they are ready to have children. Back in the old days, when girls hit the age of 13, they got married and they were old enough to have kids.
Even with rape, I'm against abortion options. I mean that baby is half the mother and half the father. I could never destroy half of myself, and could never destroy another creature.
Adoption is still an option. It's not the babies fault that the mother was raped. sO why should the mother punish the baby for it?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:06 pm
Jemradel I am pro-life. I have decided that for all those women who just don't want to have a baby because they "can't do it" should put the kid up for adoption. (And then possibly be shot.) But... I was thinking. What about incest? What about rape? Rape of little girls? I mean. I don't know.. this tears at me. There have been several children who were products of rape and incest that have changed the world. But... little girls. They can't have babies without hurting their bodies... But if it was rape, then it wasn't their fault. But it's not the baby's fault either. So... I don't know. What do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:19 pm
i say rapists should suffer the same fate as their child, should she become pregnant. if she decides to kill the child, kill the rapist. that should bring down rape numbers by quite a bit...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
