|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:00 am
lunashock I think it's a bit unrealistic to say that a child should never have a tantrum or a meltdown. I know people like Kukushka don't like children who scream in restaurants and the such, but I refuse to give my child the attention, negative or otherwise, when he is being like that. Usually we go to the bathroom or car till he gets it worked out. I know it's probably different from most, but I don't care about the nasty stares or people like or disliking how I discipline my child in public. For the most part, my son is well behaved, but like every single child, he has his shining moments. I personally do not like using scare tactics either when it comes to disciplining. I don't threaten to throw things away (not that in a heat of an arguement I haven't said that!). I do have a reward and consquence thing going on with him. Of course, that's not something that would have worked when he was 2 or 18 months. At the end of the week, depending on his behavior and if he's done his chores, he gets a reward. Sometimes it's a playdate, toy, etc. So, if he does start acting out he gets a reminder of his reward for the end of the week or told if I count to 3 and it doesn't stop, he's going in a timeout. Also, it's a bit different because my son is prone to getting extremely frustrated because he has a speech delay. My son is very bright and I used "scare tactics" in that situation because I knew it would work. He know I wouldnt actually throw his toys away but he also knows that I would do somthing to punish him and he knows it wouldnt be pleasant. I dont know how ignoring the problem is teaching them that the behavior is innappropriate yes they get bored and frustrated because your not listening but they keep trying because they dont know what else to do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:11 am
Well, I'm not saying your son isn't bright nor isn't mine. wink
I did say, personally it doesn't work for him. We all have our own unique ways of parenting. With my son, if I acknowledge his fits, it turns into a battle. He does have a lot of attitude or so I think for his age. So, when we have to go somewhere I have the talk about how we need to behave because it's not appropriate and a reminder of the reward (which I'm sure it can also be viewed as a bribe by some).
The way I see it, is even I have my adult temper tantrums where I just want to scream and need some time alone. Usually, if it's gotten to the point where he is throwing a fit, it's probably best that I ignore it because of the fact I don't think I can be calm, which it's really important for me.
Of course, no set discipline system is going to work for every child. I just stated that those tactics don't work for my son, but I know they work for plenty of other children and they are very well behaved. I just know after my husband came back from deployment, it wasn't something we could use because he had a lot of fears that daddy was going to leave.
I was in no way stating your parenting style was "wrong" just it didn't work for us. I can see how it would work for you, I posted to show how it would work for us since you said you don't see how.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:11 pm
Look all I was saying about the meltdowns is it is behavior that is typical, expected, and NORMAL of a child OF A CERTAIN AGE.
If the child is a two year old and can not express themselves with the same sort of vocabulary as a five year old, and like my child can not reach light switches or faucets, or doorknobs (she's a bit short), or unbutton buttons. BUT wants to. DESPERATLY WANTS TO. Because ALL Two year olds DESPERATELY want to do do EVERYTHING by themselves as their lives are all about power and who has it and how to get more of if, It is NORMAL for their AGE to have low patience. AND you simply can't spank or time out patience into them. They will have to learn it. Patience is LEARNED.
You can certainly "not reward" them for it.
It's like telling a certain aged teenager (around 14-16) to drop the attitude. You're better off just ignoring their attitude and telling them when they are not exhibiting said attitude and can act like a decent person again and speak without the huffing and the eyerolling they can come speak to you.
But you can't punish out "attitude." You can NOT make your child not feel helpless, frustrated, and angry and they're going to have to show those feelings and if throwing a fit on the floor in their room is how they deal with anger at two years old, WHICH IS NORMAL (hello terrible twos anyone?) that's fine.
Hell, I tripped over my husband's travel coffee mug which he left sitting by the hall IN FRONT OF THE DOOR and coat closet and got so pissed because I was carrying McDonalds and the baby I kicked the damned thing across the room and said "GOD DAMN IT!" Not my most shining moment. But hey. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:10 am
Nopenname Look all I was saying about the meltdowns is it is behavior that is typical, expected, and NORMAL of a child OF A CERTAIN AGE. If the child is a two year old and can not express themselves with the same sort of vocabulary as a five year old, and like my child can not reach light switches or faucets, or doorknobs (she's a bit short), or unbutton buttons. BUT wants to. DESPERATLY WANTS TO. Because ALL Two year olds DESPERATELY want to do do EVERYTHING by themselves as their lives are all about power and who has it and how to get more of if, It is NORMAL for their AGE to have low patience. AND you simply can't spank or time out patience into them. They will have to learn it. Patience is LEARNED. You can certainly "not reward" them for it. It's like telling a certain aged teenager (around 14-16) to drop the attitude. You're better off just ignoring their attitude and telling them when they are not exhibiting said attitude and can act like a decent person again and speak without the huffing and the eyerolling they can come speak to you. But you can't punish out "attitude." You can NOT make your child not feel helpless, frustrated, and angry and they're going to have to show those feelings and if throwing a fit on the floor in their room is how they deal with anger at two years old, WHICH IS NORMAL (hello terrible twos anyone?) that's fine. Hell, I tripped over my husband's travel coffee mug which he left sitting by the hall IN FRONT OF THE DOOR and coat closet and got so pissed because I was carrying McDonalds and the baby I kicked the damned thing across the room and said "GOD DAMN IT!" Not my most shining moment. But hey. xd see i agree with this statement but i think that it is important that at this age you start teaching them to work through their emotions with their "i" statments and their words because the longer you wait to teach them these things the harder it will be to teach them i mean look at the situation im in my daughter is 4 and we have waited to teach her these things and now we have spent the last 6 months teaching her these things and half the time it dosent work but with my oldest son i started doing these things with him when he was 2 and it only toke me about three weeks of constantly reminding him to use his words and he caught on so my advice is to start early and stick to your guns or nothing will work
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:22 am
Well, with what you've said, that's the crux of discipline. The upmost core is consistency and having ALL caretakers on the same page as well.
While I like my son to use his words, his being speech delayed, that would eventually start his frustration to kick in because if I were to do that, it would be constant correction. Which the speech therapist said, yes, we have to work on at home, but not to make it a totally unenjoyable experience. If the child isn't speech delayed, then sounds pretty good.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:45 pm
RinoaRose Nopenname I deal with whining and meltdowns by looking at her and saying: CALM DOWN. And not helping her until she does and when she asks for it etc. im not saying by any means that you should yell at her im just saying that if you dont teach her now how to deal with her emotions rather than having a melt down it could come back to bit you in the a** like it did me but now that we have taught alyssa to use her words and her "i" statements we have fewer meltdowns and let me tell you its wonderful now i can take her out and not have to worry about her feaking out I actually think that Nopen IS punishing tantrum behaviour and discouraging it. She is with-holding the desired (be it thing, action, whatever) from her kid until they calm down. Thus they learn that tantrums solve nothing and that it's best to control their emotions and approach the problem in a way that WILL get it solved. wotfan We do a little bit of bribing but its not to stop negative behavior its to make good behavior more appealing. EX: "If you clean your room all by yourself daddy will bring you home a treat" Eh, in my house, cleaning my room was something that I, as a member of the household, had to do. It wasn't a good thing worth rewarding any more than the fact that I went to school today means that I deserve a treat. I am a student, going to school is just the basic thing that I am supposed to do. If I did something above and beyond my base chores (like, say cleaned my parents' room as well), then I would earn a treat. But looking back, I see what a hypocrit I am. I did say that no one strategy works for every child and, if it works for you, it obviously can't be all that wrong. lunashock I think it's a bit unrealistic to say that a child should never have a tantrum or a meltdown. I know people like Kukushka don't like children who scream in restaurants and the such, but I refuse to give my child the attention, negative or otherwise, when he is being like that. It annoys me, yes. But I don't blame anyone if a small child has a tantrum (in some cases, I am extremely forgiving -- for example, I will NEVER get angry or in any way phased if a kid cries during take off or landing on a plane because I know that it can't be controlled at all). But really, the tantrum itself usually doesn't bother me as much as how it is handled. For example, while I am all in favor of the "I will ignore you until you stop tantruming" strategy, I think it's inappropriate for parents to use that mode of discipline in, say, a movie theater when other people are trying to watch a movie. There are some behaviors that are NOT acceptable in some situations and, if that behavior is going to happen (as I know it does and will), then the behavior should be removed from the situation in which it is inappropriate. Ie: take the kid outside and ignore it there until it stops tantruming. Otherwise, you are just ruining the movie-watching experience for 20-30 other people just to prove a point to your kid. And, as I said, I'd almost rather just sit there and listen to a toddler scream for an hour than hear a parent say something like "if stop screaming, I'll buy you a toy." Sorry, wotfan! I just can't get over that. The bribery really gets to me, lol. lunashock Well, with what you've said, that's the crux of discipline. The upmost core is consistency and having ALL caretakers on the same page as well. I agree 100%. Fine something that works and be CONSISTANT. A child is never going to learn if X is ok with uncle Harry but not with mom, or punished with dad but ceasing the behavior is rewarded with grandma. Kids are having to build their knowledge of the world from scratch. Telling them that mrgreen is a smile one day but a frown another is only going to confuse them and make it take that much longer to learn.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:12 am
as i think everyone here will agree no matter what form of disipline you use it has to be consistant but here's a quick question for you do you think it is acceptable to have you babysitter spank your kids?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:49 pm
RinoaRose do you think it is acceptable to have you babysitter spank your kids? No. I don't. I was a babysitter for a long time and that was a can of worms I was not about to mess around with. Physical punishment (or really, any kind of harsh punishment) should be left to the primary caregivers. I did time outs but that was it. I wouldn't raise my voice, threaten with anything more severe then "I will let your parents know you did this," or raise my hands. I just never felt it was a babysitter's place to do something like that. For my own children, I do not trust a babysitter to physically punish my children without going too far. Even if he/she is trustworthy and good, there is just such a fine line between acceptable punishment and abuse that I wouldn't leave it up to someone who wasn't a primary caregiver to determine where that line is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:06 pm
RinoaRose as i think everyone here will agree no matter what form of disipline you use it has to be consistant but here's a quick question for you do you think it is acceptable to have you babysitter spank your kids? Nope. If I have kids one day, I will ask that the baby-sitter use a different method of discipline. Or I will tell the baby-sitter what I consider to be appropriate methods of discipline for my kids, and I will ask him/her to use one of those methods.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:15 am
ok so what if your babysitter was a family member would you consider it ok to have them spank your kids?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:14 am
RinoaRose ok so what if your babysitter was a family member would you consider it ok to have them spank your kids? No, I wouldn't unless it was my husband. I think it's one of those things it depends on each individual family member, but I'd never allow a caregiver to spank my child.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:59 am
lunashock RinoaRose ok so what if your babysitter was a family member would you consider it ok to have them spank your kids? No, I wouldn't unless it was my husband. I think it's one of those things it depends on each individual family member, but I'd never allow a caregiver to spank my child. and why is that do you not trust them enough or what?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 11:19 am
Child care providers and consistancey... if you spank and do not want your care giver to spank then there is no consistancy. All in all it makes using a different form of dicipline from the beginning. There are soo monay good methoeds that do not need physical dicipline!
Ya many of us have issued the swat on the but either out of frustration, or anger or just nothing else seemed to work, or because we felt it was right to do at the time. But if we all say no spanking from the sitter or caregiver then we need to think about that.
You want dicipline to work from one place to another, be it redirection, praise for good behaviour, time out for negative reinforcement, 123 magic, or teaching self dicipline as kids get older. I have three, two teen boys and a 6 yr old girl. The older two were often spanked by my ex and weaning them off the agression and violance they suffered took years of therapy! (he was far worse then the occational smack on the bum... but not as far as official abuse, CPS did caution him on a number of occations about use of inapropriate dicipline) I vowed NOT to use physical dicipline... and now I have three kids that do not throw tantrums, are polite and well manered, kind to others, share willingly, and generaly win them compliments from freinds and family members alike (even the odd stranger will come up to me and tell me how well behaved my kids are... feels weird but good too. Just strange lil old ladies comming up to me saying "you have such nice well mannered boys!" or "What a sweet little lady you have there." Mostly when one of my sons has offered to hold a door or carry groceries out to a car.)
I hated it when social workers expecting their first baby tried to tell me what I should be doing to raise my kids... when they did not fully comprehend the situation. However I concidered the source, and made a specific request for a worker who had raised a few children! This was the last worker I ever met, and she was a dream come true!
The bottom line is use what works and stick with it, bearing in mind that children need to be treated as people with feelings that they are entitled to and that need to be acknoleged! To get respect you do neet to give it, but spoiling a child does them no favours!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 1:55 pm
I work as a caregiver at a daycare. I would NEVER want the responsibility of spanking a child that isn't my own. If you want the consistency, tell the caregiver that is the punishment, and to tell YOU, so you can administer the spanking when you get home. Not only are you taking a risk (not everyone has the same idea of what force to use when administering a spanking) you're tossing something on the babysitter they probably don't want.
As for when I have my own kids, I've learned firsthand that the same things don't work on all kids, but, there are some things I've found don't seem to work on ANY of the kids. There's probably exceptions out there, but these seem to be pretty basic.
1. Giving in to tantrums/rewarding bad behavior. I think a reward for a normal, good behavior is okay, it's a pretty strong reinforcement, as long as it doesn't happen ALL the time. But, you can't bribe a child out of a tantrum, at least an "asking for something" tantrum. You can redirect one in a "Mommy! He stole that from me!" type tantrum, though. In fact, that seems to be the best thing for the age group I work with (k-5).
2. Not following through. You give a "last warning", make that the real last warning. If you don't, your child learns that you don't mean what you say, and will run right over you. At where I work, you can TELL, at least when they start at the daycare, which childeren are from homes that discipline their children, and which let their children run right over them.
Those two are the big basics. There are other, idealistic ideas I have, but... they are idealistic. And, like I said, I don't have children, those two come from experience working in childcare.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 1:35 pm
Krystlanna Child care providers and consistancey... if you spank and do not want your care giver to spank then there is no consistancy. I disagree. Consistancy doesn't mean that everyone your child meets needs to be either spanking him/her or not doing so. What it means is that the primary care givers need to be consistant in their own methods. For example, I have sex with my fiance but I don't have sex with his parents, my parents, or strangers on the street. That doesn't make me "inconsistant." All it means is that it's appropriate to behave in certain ways towards certain people, but not towards other people. It's appropriate for a parent to spank a child, but not for a 15-year-old babysitter or a teacher. Krystlanna I vowed NOT to use physical dicipline... and now I have three kids that do not throw tantrums, are polite and well manered, kind to others, share willingly It's absolutly fantastic that you've found discipline that works for your children. However, every child is an individual. What works brilliantly for some children doesn't necessarily work for every other child. As long as the results are good (not just well-behaved, but emotionally stable and happy as well), then how the parent achieved that should not matter. NOTE: I know you said pretty much the same thing in your last paragraph, I just wanted to draw attention to it. I do have to agree with RoseRose. While there may be exceptions, I have never met a single child who responded well to either of those two actions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|