|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:33 pm
Wallace is from the first timeline 10 years after FE7. Doesn't know any OCs and hadn't spoken to anyone since the events of FE7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:48 am
Wil is from the same timeline as Rath, and they're the same age. Wil also left Elibe right before FE6. In his timeline Rebecca died in childbirth and wanting his child to be raised by a Father and a Mother sent him to live with Eliwood in Phares castle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:01 am
I say Izzy is from Timeline 1, about 2-5 years after the FE7 event. I can't remember exactly when she entered Learania when I made a post during Winter '09, but what I do know is that her relationship with Harken has fallen apart due to Harken's emo post-traumatic depression and he left her again. So Izzy went through her depression about her relationship when riding her horse, unaware that she entered Learania.
I will admit I don't remember if she's aware about the Door leading her to Learania or not, but I do remember what she was going through before enter Learania.
So I will say right now, Izzy is somewhere in her mid-thirties to early forties while when she entered Learania, she was in her late twenties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:07 pm
I'd honestly say stick Rath and Wil into Timeline 1.
Timeline 4 is the same as 1, it just tells a non-canon story in between 7 and 6. And since 4's timeline has 'Mark' as the tactician, as is canon, there's nothing saying that timeline 1 and 4 can't be in the same line, really. (It's just my childhood derping around)
It's just weird for Wil to be listed in 4, when I didn't really have Wil fleshed into my story. Really, only my OCs should be in there, just like only Mallow and Danni's OCs should be in 2 and only Nils' OCs should be in 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:56 pm
So what I've decided for Hector is that he comes in 10 years after FE7, making Roy and Lilina 5 years old. He disappeared shortly after Roy and Lilina first met as kids and is 28ish at the time. He also has a beard but no 'stache.
this also ******** up all the events of FE6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:18 am
Julia is from timeline 1, vanished a year after the events of FE6 during the reconstruction of the Ilia Knights' splintering thanks to Bern. She still blames herself for being unable to continue assisting her sister and fellow knights. Is aware of Roy due to his actions in FE6 and the previous generation due to history lessons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 4:53 pm
Considering that Hector himself died in FE6, I'm not sure just how much would be affected by Hector disappearing in the interim between the two games.
We can assume that the change is not severe, though, I like to think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:00 pm
That is difficult to determine. By dying 10 years before FE6, I find it most likely that Orun would have taken control of Ostia, leaving his adviser perhaps, or just somebody else in general, in charge of Thria.
This would likely result in similar outcomes, with Orun dying in Hector's place instead of at the hands of his adviser. Sue may not have been helped by Orun as an outcome, so who's to say what would happen to her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:14 pm
Couldn't Oswin take Hector's place as Marquess? I think he became the steward at the end of FE7 or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:30 pm
gabriel sama Couldn't Oswin take Hector's place as Marquess? I think he became the steward at the end of FE7 or something. No. If Oswin is a steward, then he's in no position to lead the Ostia. I think they may find the next oldest male relative to lead Ostia. I highly doubt they let female rule. >>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:40 pm
Lyn ruled Caelin.
But Lyn wasn't five years old.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:59 pm
Nomad Rath Lyn ruled Caelin. But Lyn wasn't five years old. I'm aware that her grandfather was ill, but he was still the ruler of Caelin, even though Lyn was taking his place so he could recover. But after he died, Lyn abdicated the throne to Hector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 8:18 pm
....Uh, yeah, out of choice, not necessity. Nobody made her abdicate because she was a woman. She returned to the plains because that's where she felt home was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:27 am
Perhaps we can assume that Orun taking over Ostia is precisely the reason why Sue was held as prisoner in Thria; Orun was away on Ostia, and though he could leave instructions for his stewards and other officials all he wanted, as soon as the messages stopped when he was killed in Ostia, they immediately held Sue as a captive instead of as a guest in order to ward off Bern's intents on attacking them?
It's an idea, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
