|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:52 pm
I don't understand how people can actually do this. T__T It blows my mind.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:40 pm
Page Boy Photo realism is somewhat of a crowd pleaser. People just basically want to see themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:14 pm
ficklefiend Page Boy Photo realism is somewhat of a crowd pleaser. People just basically want to see themselves. ? i was talking about photo-realism in general, not just portraits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:09 am
Page Boy ficklefiend Page Boy Photo realism is somewhat of a crowd pleaser. People just basically want to see themselves. ? i was talking about photo-realism in general, not just portraits. No, themselves as in human. Show people realistic looking humans- themselves- and they'll be happy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:40 pm
ficklefiend Page Boy ficklefiend Page Boy Photo realism is somewhat of a crowd pleaser. People just basically want to see themselves. ? i was talking about photo-realism in general, not just portraits. No, themselves as in human. Show people realistic looking humans- themselves- and they'll be happy. i suppose, but again, i wasn't speaking soley of portraits. People seem to be impressed with even non human photo-realism: nature, animals, landscapes, still lifes. actually, i think people accept stylism more easily with human and animal subjects, than with inanimate objects or scenes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:31 pm
Page Boy ficklefiend Page Boy ficklefiend Page Boy Photo realism is somewhat of a crowd pleaser. People just basically want to see themselves. ? i was talking about photo-realism in general, not just portraits. No, themselves as in human. Show people realistic looking humans- themselves- and they'll be happy. i suppose, but again, i wasn't speaking soley of portraits. People seem to be impressed with even non human photo-realism: nature, animals, landscapes, still lifes. actually, i think people accept stylism more easily with human and animal subjects, than with inanimate objects or scenes. Yeah, it's funny how a picture that looks like a photograph, or more often, slightly more perfect than a photo could be, is most visually pleasing to people. You could put just as much work and effort and detail into an abstract or stylised piece as a realistic one and still most people would go for reality...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:12 pm
I posted this topic like a year ago, and someone decided to post in it.
you guys are crazy, yo.
You know, I look at this picture and I think of all the memories from last year. Which is cool, kinda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
