|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:48 am
So you really want to play this game with me? Trust me, I'm not a person who you do that with but you decided to. Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) 12,000,000 (concentration camps and civilians WWII) http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.htmlAlso from that site: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69) 49,000,000 ("great leap forward" and "cultural revolution") Which is 8,166,666 people per year. Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1934-39) 13,000,000 (the purges) or 2,600,000 people per year. Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915) 1,200,000 Armenians which is just under the amount of fetii per year aborted. More genocides http://www.ppu.org.uk/genocide/g_genocide_intro.htmlOver 11 million people died in the systematic genocide carried out by the Third Reich. http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/features/holocaust/Well that fits in better with what I'VE been saying than you hmm? Germany during the time of the Holocaust WAS the THIRD REICH. To properally talk about that then you need to talk about what all the Third Reich HAD. But if you want to look at in a way that might favor your side only about half of the people who died were Jews. That would mean per year it's only 1,000,000. Happy now that you won? Or are you going to continue to try and play this game? Oh and as a random point to help you more: Added to these acknowledged abortions are the unreported countless millions of very early abortions caused by abortifacients such as IUDs(Inta-Uterine Devices), the Pill, and the human pesticide RU-486, that prevent implantation of the human embryo on the uterine wall. These all meet the scientific, medical, and most certainly, moral definition of abortion. http://www.knightsite.com/kc9496/unborn15.htmSo if any of you guys use that stuff you're just as bad as the people who abort because you're preventing life and supporting the abortion holocaust.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:55 am
What game? You said that the holocaust killed more people per year than abortion did. I simply proved you wrong. I'm sorry if that upset you. And if you've read some of the past threads in this guild, you know that many of us are against those forms of birth control, myself included.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:02 pm
Vivnox Oh and as a random point to help you more: Added to these acknowledged abortions are the unreported countless millions of very early abortions caused by abortifacients such as IUDs(Inta-Uterine Devices), the Pill, and the human pesticide RU-486, that prevent implantation of the human embryo on the uterine wall. These all meet the scientific, medical, and most certainly, moral definition of abortion. Whoa whoa whoa. They do not meet the scientific or medical definition of abortion or your definition or mine. You can't argue by assigning your opposition a belief they don't actually hold. And the fact that fewer millions of people died from one cause than another does not make that cause somehow better. Jeffery Dahmer isn't any less evil than Josef Stalin. They both killed people. Killing one person is killing one too many. The end.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:05 pm
La Veuve Zin Vivnox Oh and as a random point to help you more: Added to these acknowledged abortions are the unreported countless millions of very early abortions caused by abortifacients such as IUDs(Inta-Uterine Devices), the Pill, and the human pesticide RU-486, that prevent implantation of the human embryo on the uterine wall. These all meet the scientific, medical, and most certainly, moral definition of abortion. Whoa whoa whoa. They do not meet the scientific or medical definition of abortion or your definition or mine. You can't argue by assigning your opposition a belief they don't actually hold. And the fact that fewer millions of people died from one cause than another does not make that cause somehow better. Jeffery Dahmer isn't any less evil than Josef Stalin. They both killed people. Killing one person is killing one too many. The end. Very good point.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:13 pm
Because there's an actual debate going I'll say it's fine to continue. However for future reference, Vivnox, the same thing I said to Talon applies to you as well. You, like her, are a conditional member of the guild. Meaning there are certain things you must do that not everyone else has to, this includes holding your tongue in certain threads.
If you wanted to debate abortion/holocaust similarities/differences than there are a couple other threads you could have done so in. This was not a debate thread however this was a personal thought thread.
Once again if KP feels that I'm cracking down too hard than I'll step back, however until otherwise stated, you are to stick to non-abortion related threads or threads where there is an actual abortion debate being started. Otherwise you are sticking your nose where it doesn't need to be stuck.
This is the pro-life guild and there are certain pro-life thoughts and ideas that people have, we are entitled to those as you are to your pro-choice thoughts and ideas, we don't need you arguing with our ideas on OUR territory.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:20 pm
Viv, I'm not a mod, but I'm going to pretend to be one for a moment: When you joined the guild, I believe that one of the conditions was, if you are going to make abortion-related comments, be polite, and civilized. Quote: So you really want to play this game with me? Trust me, I'm not a person who you do that with but you decided to. Happy now that you won? Or are you going to continue to try and play this game? So if any of you guys use that stuff you're just as bad as the people who abort because you're preventing life and supporting the abortion holocaust. Those sound like fighting words to me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:21 pm
Er, sorry Miranda, didn't see your post. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:46 pm
I pointed out a flaw in the thing that the livejournal post stated. Also the one thing that I mentioned was taken from a pro-life site. So yeah, that is from your side's philosophy.
You guys continue to argue against a point that I now validated through site then there's asinine there. Plain and simple.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:53 pm
So wait. You said,
"Just because I am a dork and I was curious I worked out the math here.
Okay Holocaust (I'm starting it in 1939 [even though Kristalnaucht was in Novemeber] and ending in 1945) killed ~2,000,000 people each year. Going with the idea of 12,000,000 people total were killed.
Abortion (from 1973-2006) has killed ~1,212,121 fetii per year.
So I'm going to request from now on that people do not say that abortion is worse than the Holocaust (not saying anyone here ever has, but the livejournal post did and when you break it down by years the person is incorrect). "
Okay. So you put forth that mathematically, the holocaust killed more people than abortion did.
I showed you that it did not.
And somehow there's a flaw in the thing the livejournal stated?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:55 pm
La Veuve Zin Vivnox Oh and as a random point to help you more: Added to these acknowledged abortions are the unreported countless millions of very early abortions caused by abortifacients such as IUDs(Inta-Uterine Devices), the Pill, and the human pesticide RU-486, that prevent implantation of the human embryo on the uterine wall. These all meet the scientific, medical, and most certainly, moral definition of abortion. Whoa whoa whoa. They do not meet the scientific or medical definition of abortion or your definition or mine. You can't argue by assigning your opposition a belief they don't actually hold. And the fact that fewer millions of people died from one cause than another does not make that cause somehow better. Jeffery Dahmer isn't any less evil than Josef Stalin. They both killed people. Killing one person is killing one too many. The end. I agree with La Veuve Zin on this. It has no relevance which one kill/killed more, both of them kill/killed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:01 pm
Vivnox I pointed out a flaw in the thing that the livejournal post stated. Also the one thing that I mentioned was taken from a pro-life site. So yeah, that is from your side's philosophy. You guys continue to argue against a point that I now validated through site then there's asinine there. Plain and simple. Um, where I'm standing, Kate is still right. Abortion kills more per year then Germany did Jews. If you are going to add in other things on the side of Germany's Holocaust, more than the 1 mil Jews, other things must be added to the side of Abortion. I don't know what you would add, especially since things like executed criminals wouldn't be thought of as horrible by all Pro-Lifers, and also doesn't have quite the same quality of "bad" as the other parts of the Holocaust. Also, why should the number of abortions be limited to those of the United States? I don't understand that. Abortion happens everywhere; Why shouldn't all abortions be counted? Just because more countries are doing Abortion then did the Holocaust doesn't make it a lesser evil. In fact, that makes it worse. Last, even if we conceded that Abortion might kill less per year then the Holocaust, it has been going on longer. Just because Hitler didn't ration out his killings quite as well as abortionists do doesn't make the number of abortions any less significant then the Holocaust. Actually, all this just makes me think of a way to make the message more powerful: More countries participate in abortion then did in the Holocaust, and more deaths are caused by Abortion worldwide in two years then were killed by Hitler, Stalin, Ze-Dong, and Enver combined.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:52 pm
Vivnox I pointed out a flaw in the thing that the livejournal post stated. Also the one thing that I mentioned was taken from a pro-life site. So yeah, that is from your side's philosophy. You guys continue to argue against a point that I now validated through site then there's asinine there. Plain and simple. I don't care why you were arguing, it wasn't a debate, it was a thought. I will repeat this this once more.
Do not argue pro-life thoughts, unless they are being used in an abortion debate context. If you do I will delete your post. It may seem unfair that this rule only applies because you are pro-choice however as I have said you are a conditional member of the guild, there are certain things expected of you to stay a member and until I am told differently by KP this is one of them.
This is OUR territory and arguing for the sake of arguing when you're in a guild that holds the exact opposite views as your own, only serves to upset people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:53 pm
I.Am Er, sorry Miranda, didn't see your post. sweatdrop S'ok even if I say something you're allowed to back it up, even if you don't realize you're doing it. XD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 3:05 pm
Simmer down children.
It's actually a void debate from the start, Wiki (which I DO trust, so everyone shutup) cites a debated range of 9 million to 26 million. When something varies by SEVENTEEN digits, it is far from concrete.
Therefore, i'm sure the person mentioned in the original post used a source that supported her point of view, while Viv used one to support her's. Technically, with the proper source, you could be right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust#Aftermath
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|