|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:25 am
Hinote Tosatsu BluewolfofMibu Oh, alright...so long as it doesn't get too crazy. If I see things getting out of hand, I'll lock this page...kay pumpkin? blaugh That's my job! Fun stealer! scream ~ Personally, I wouldn't sue anyone. Seriously, suing people helps nobody but the lawyers. The guy you sue loses not only money, but if they're a big group, they get bad publicity, possibly losing more money. You lose money paying the lawyer fees, to the point where by the time you win you've spent more than you get. But the lawyer? He loses nothing, and gains everything. It's a retarded cycle. James Sokolove should be ---- ... Nevermind. Edit: Plus, in that example, the guy's already locked up someplace for doing it, why throw salt in the wounds? ~ How is left leaning and right leaning derogatory? If you're left leaning, you probably don't care that someone thinks you're left leaning. Actually very few times the person who said it will ever be procesuted by the police and arrested. And suing in this respect isn't a waste of money. The person who broke the law will go to jail, recieve meals, and a home, The person who was trampled and is now in the hospital doesn't have to worry about being out of work, and having to pay all the doctor bills, and sadly, the lawyer does get paid, but alteast they brought justice. It is their job after all. Also, I didn't have a problem with those terms, but greg pmed me, and if we negate the use of those then there can be no " Left leaning ~!$@&" Or " Right leaning !($@# " It is a measure to keep people from arguing, and takes away one of their weapons.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:26 am
iAkura-kun Hinote Tosatsu Edit: Plus, in that example, the guy's already locked up someplace for doing it, why throw salt in the wounds? To make it hurt more? blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:27 am
@ havik
Actually, I have no problem being labeled. you find one that fits, and i'll accept it. I'm an unaffiliated, I switch sides more than Italy. ( Heh, WWII joke. )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:28 am
-o-Havik-o- iAkura-kun Hinote Tosatsu Edit: Plus, in that example, the guy's already locked up someplace for doing it, why throw salt in the wounds? To make it hurt more? blaugh Oh really? - Gets a knife and some salt - :3 @ Zetsu: That makes two of us XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:31 am
iAkura-kun -o-Havik-o- iAkura-kun Hinote Tosatsu Edit: Plus, in that example, the guy's already locked up someplace for doing it, why throw salt in the wounds? To make it hurt more? blaugh Oh really? - Gets a knife and some salt - :3 @ Zetsu: That makes two of us XD No Akura!!! nuuuuuuuuu!!! * runs outside and starts running toward akura IRL * This might take a while!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:36 am
TvIaMsOqTuHeYz Hinote Tosatsu BluewolfofMibu Oh, alright...so long as it doesn't get too crazy. If I see things getting out of hand, I'll lock this page...kay pumpkin? blaugh That's my job! Fun stealer! scream ~ Personally, I wouldn't sue anyone. Seriously, suing people helps nobody but the lawyers. The guy you sue loses not only money, but if they're a big group, they get bad publicity, possibly losing more money. You lose money paying the lawyer fees, to the point where by the time you win you've spent more than you get. But the lawyer? He loses nothing, and gains everything. It's a retarded cycle. James Sokolove should be ---- ... Nevermind. Edit: Plus, in that example, the guy's already locked up someplace for doing it, why throw salt in the wounds? ~ How is left leaning and right leaning derogatory? If you're left leaning, you probably don't care that someone thinks you're left leaning. Actually very few times the person who said it will ever be procesuted by the police and arrested. And suing in this respect isn't a waste of money. The person who broke the law will go to jail, recieve meals, and a home, The person who was trampled and is now in the hospital doesn't have to worry about being out of work, and having to pay all the doctor bills, and sadly, the lawyer does get paid, but alteast they brought justice. It is their job after all. Also, I didn't have a problem with those terms, but greg pmed me, and if we negate the use of those then there can be no " Left leaning ~!$@&" Or " Right leaning !($@# " It is a measure to keep people from arguing, and takes away one of their weapons.
The trampled person would also be able to give there employer the doctor note, and police report showing they were injured and wont have to worry about getting fire.
If they have a lawyer then they most likely have some type of insurance as well which will cover there doctors bill.
Lawsuits have become a joke, and the following is a prime example:
A man broke into a lady's home, she got back early from shopping and arrived mid robbery. The man trying to steal all her stuff when to hide in her garage, she made it into her house and locked all the doors and went about her business not knowing the man TRYING TO ROB HER was stuck in the garage. For two days she didn't leave her home and the man was stuck in the garage and apparently ate dog food for two days.
Well when he got out of her garage he sued her... and won....
@Tv: Then that statement was not directed toward you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinote Tosatsu Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:41 am
Havik:
1. It's sad to think that such things actually happen.
2. That guy must have been retarded.
3. olololololololololololol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:47 am
@Tosatsu : Lol My thoughts exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:49 am
TvIaMsOqTuHeYz iAkura-kun -o-Havik-o- iAkura-kun Hinote Tosatsu Edit: Plus, in that example, the guy's already locked up someplace for doing it, why throw salt in the wounds? To make it hurt more? blaugh Oh really? - Gets a knife and some salt - :3 @ Zetsu: That makes two of us XD No Akura!!! nuuuuuuuuu!!! * runs outside and starts running toward akura IRL * This might take a while!!! Where do you live?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:56 am
The person who was trampled would naturally look and see the person yelling. there fore they would have recollection of who yelled it. the cops don't want to have to deal with it, because they could work on something else that is more pressing, but if a lawsuit is engaged, then they actually have to find the person. clear and present danger isn't enforced all too often.
Yeah, but the time without pay, mixed with the doctor bills, that makes it extremely bad for that person as they had no income and they were spending money.
Lawyers are paid out of pocket, and insurance doesn't cover everything. Depending on your insurance plan, you have partial coverage, this is why most people who can afford it double up with two different insurance companies to get everything covered. Like some insurance won't cover any scans of any sort, so a cat scan, X-ray, blood test, or anything like that would cost you out of pocket, and each costs about 300-1000 dollars. Insurance is the true joke now. It used to cover everything, but since it started losing money, it changed.
Also, what did he sue her for, and if she HAD been inside her home the entire time, chances are she would have heard him in the garage. Also, I doubt that the man ate dogfood after only two days. also, doors unlock from the indside, so unless she has a door to the garage that locks things inside the garage, then he could have gotten out, there was probably an access door in the garage to the attic, which he could have used to get out, and she probably didn't counter sue him for breaking and entering, tresspassing, larceny, or many of the other hundreds of things he might have done against the law, like being in the garage, she could have counter sued for attempted theft, or grand theft auto if she had her car in there and he tried to get in it.
Truely, either she had a crappy lawyer that didn't like her, or the entire plot of that case was fake, and made up by someone. If you find me a newspaper article about that case then i'll believe it. But she also has to have not counter sued, otherwise if she had been smart about it, she would have walked away with probably all of that man's money, plus whatever she had to pay him.
Also, I can see why he won because of this. " Justice is Blind. " That is the golden rule of law, if someone does an injustice, Justice will judge them and do what she sees fit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:58 am
iAkura-kun TvIaMsOqTuHeYz iAkura-kun -o-Havik-o- iAkura-kun Hinote Tosatsu Edit: Plus, in that example, the guy's already locked up someplace for doing it, why throw salt in the wounds? To make it hurt more? blaugh Oh really? - Gets a knife and some salt - :3 @ Zetsu: That makes two of us XD No Akura!!! nuuuuuuuuu!!! * runs outside and starts running toward akura IRL * This might take a while!!! Where do you live? Oooooooooklahoma where the wind comes... Ok, I'm not typing the entire song...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:10 pm
You must of never been in a situation were there was a large crowd of panicking people you trampling you... you would not have seen the person who yelled, or for that matter just automatically know who they are.
Aflac cover almost everything you need covered... It is pretty cheep to.
The article was on the front page of Yahoo about 6 months ago, seeing as there story's come from reporters I would say it is a safe bet. Everything you listed on why she could have lost was just a slew of Bs that people use to put reason on unreasonable things. The simple fact of it shouldn't of happened and it did is the only thing that matters. Trying to explain why it happened doesn't change the fact that because suing people has become a sport it mostly does more harm than good.
Dog food isn't that bad, and two days of NOTHING to eat... go two days with nothing around but something that is only bitter, you'll eat it.
Also you say also a lot...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:23 pm
I know I say also quite often I can't tink of a better word for introducing my next thought.
Actually I have, And i saw the person, because people don't just get up and start running, they look first to see what is wrong. basic reflex. and no I didn't know the person, but I could easily describe him afterward. Trampling actually often happens to the people who get up first. because they'll stop in a hallway or something and say where is the fire, and everyone else who completely got the message will suddenly overtake that person and trample them. so look before you act.
Almost being the operative word. some doctors will keep doing what aflac doesn't cover. Alfac only covers one, about once a month. If you have to get blood tests every day, not to mention room and board ( Yes hospitals do charge you for staying there. ), Hospitals can get rather pricy.
Well, It actually should happen, because any injustice should be punished. It is like when a wicked individual takes over a country, he should be punished. But when a specific person murders that person, they should be punished. that's why Justice is blind. She can not see the impurity in those who she saves, and can not see the good in those she judges. It is that simple. No, you think it does harm, but look on the flip side, for that man it did good. you just don't think that way because you
and actually, I often go longer without eating... He would have had to deal with thirst more than hunger. You die from three or more consecutive days without water. ( assuming you are a regular human and you only consume 8 glasses of liquid daily. ) Let's see... On the medicine I'm on... I've had to go to the hospital once for half a day because I hadn't eaten in about four or five days.
In this post I abused Actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 1:42 pm
Question, what is left leaning, and right leaning?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 2:27 pm
If the person trampled does see the person then they would report it to the officer and the officers would be just as likely to capture the person. Thus putting them in jail and have no need to be sued.
The person who got hurt need to take responsibility for there own things, yes it is shitty they got hurt but the person who's fault it is should be in jail if they took the proper action to inform the police. They should also take the proper action in there hospitable stay. Doctors can't do anything if you don't let them, people allowing doctors to run up there medical bill is there own fault.
The women had no idea the man was in her house hold, she was not responsible for him, his action put him were he was not hers, she shouldn't have had to pay for it the man should have taken responsibility for his own actions, but he didn't instead he sued her for something that she had no control over. If she locked him in there on purpose and didn't call the cops then yes she would need to be held responsible but that wasn't the case the man hid from her, kept hiding until she needed to go out again. (Which happen to be two days later) and then he snuck out of her house and sued her. There was nothing the women could have done to prevent that.
You can go a month without eating and up to two weeks without water if your not in the elements and keep your self from wasting energy. If you are constantly stop yourself from eating and don't do much physical activity ( Which you can't do if you don't eat... not with out passing out.) then hunger pains aren't the same for you as they are from someone who eats regularly the way you are supposed to. So using yourself as a comparison doesn't show anything. I used you because I thought you ate like your supposed to, if you had made it known that you often go with out food for several days on your own accord then I wouldn't have used you for a comparison due to it not have any purpose.
Everything you keep countering with are just ways to let people not take responsibility for there own action, or take responsibility for there own well being. If most law rooms took into account a person own personal responsibility then when someone goes to sue someone else thing would be judged reasonable. That isn't how things are anymore, if someone does what you say then they should be charged with clear and present danger, and disturbing the piece. If someone gets hurt they should also be charged with reckless in-danger meant and serve there due time. They should not however be held responsible for the injured person not having insurance, or for the person letting doctors run up there medical bills.
In what I brought up the man should have been held responsible for his own action simple as that. He put himself in that situation, he chose to not bring his presence in the womens house to her attention and he should be held accountable no her.
People who don't bring personal responsibility into the equation are part of the problem and only make things worse for the people who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
