|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:36 pm
Westboro has been counter-picketed before (they even got rick-rolled >.>) While I am glad that the First Amendment was upheld, I'm not so happy that Westboro gets another reason to puff up. So long as Westboro is on public land when they picket, and do not physically molest someone, they are (unfortunately) allowed to demonstrate like anyone else. I'm a little leery of government regulating morality, even if the subject needs a little "help" to understand what is moral.
I do believe that if a funeral is private, then Westboro could be thrown out of the graveyard proper, but not off the sidewalk outside. I would have "accidentally" pointed a 21-gun salute at them, but I'm just a vindictive b***h. I almost, *almost* wish that they would deface a gravestone or something, because then they would be in such a world of legal hurt. Too bad they aren't that stupid (though it is better for the families that they don't).
And yes, I do know that hate speech is a terrible, hurtful thing, but the government cannot be allowed to decide what is too far. The second that Westboro does something to turn hate speech into hate crime, they're screwed. Until then, the whole family (and it is mostly a family, most of which are lawyers) will continue to picket and sue people when their picketing gets the desired effect, i.e. a bystander gets pissed and throws a punch. Fight them a different way, with hilarious counter-protests or by forming a human wall between the grieving family and the picket line. Sing a hymn or just show your solidarity. Don't blame the legal system for acting as a decider of law instead of as outraged human beings. They have to be impartial, otherwise what's the point?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:09 am
erinnightwalker Westboro has been counter-picketed before (they even got rick-rolled >.>) While I am glad that the First Amendment was upheld, I'm not so happy that Westboro gets another reason to puff up. So long as Westboro is on public land when they picket, and do not physically molest someone, they are (unfortunately) allowed to demonstrate like anyone else. I'm a little leery of government regulating morality, even if the subject needs a little "help" to understand what is moral. I do believe that if a funeral is private, then Westboro could be thrown out of the graveyard proper, but not off the sidewalk outside. I would have "accidentally" pointed a 21-gun salute at them, but I'm just a vindictive b***h. I almost, *almost* wish that they would deface a gravestone or something, because then they would be in such a world of legal hurt. Too bad they aren't that stupid (though it is better for the families that they don't). And yes, I do know that hate speech is a terrible, hurtful thing, but the government cannot be allowed to decide what is too far. The second that Westboro does something to turn hate speech into hate crime, they're screwed. Until then, the whole family (and it is mostly a family, most of which are lawyers) will continue to picket and sue people when their picketing gets the desired effect, i.e. a bystander gets pissed and throws a punch. Fight them a different way, with hilarious counter-protests or by forming a human wall between the grieving family and the picket line. Sing a hymn or just show your solidarity. Don't blame the legal system for acting as a decider of law instead of as outraged human beings. They have to be impartial, otherwise what's the point? but the government DOES police hurtful threats" Your going to hell, simply isn't one of them yet. try to say the word " Bomb" in an airport... there are many things we cannot legally say. Do most people get arrested for them? no, but it is still ILLEGAL. That and the fact they are using a "religion" to run a money making scam. Choosing people who are emotionally damaged, and PUSHING them, just to get the grounds for lawsuit. I'm not a lawyer, but i am pretty sure that is illegal too... or i am soo in the wrong line of work... Besides the moral issue, They are preying on the friends and families of fallen soldiers. People who get death benefits, it's a CASH COW, not a moral issue. So you would think the government would do SOMETHING about it... but they won't. (also pointing weapons at them, is a automatic lawsuit and possible criminal charges... )
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chieftain Twilight Captain
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:28 pm
before I read the rest of the replies, I am going to post my initial responce to reading those articles.
first of all, I've always stood by my support of the 1st Amendment. everyone has the right to peaceful assembly, the freedom to worship as they choose, the freedom of speech and of the press, and this right should always be protected.
however, the westboro baptists have not assembled peacefully. they have repeatedly attempted to incite violence, an when they failed to start wars they would make up that they were attacked. they have done this in person and through cyberspace.
their right to assemble peacefully would not be taken away if the Supreme Court ruled against them because their protests were violent, not peaceful. They can believe whatever they want, and they can say all the hurtful things they want, but they deserve to be persecuted to the full extent of the law for their crimes against others' freedoms.
hate-groups are allowed to believe what they do, but not to act on it. hate-crimes are illegal. I am disgusted by the ruling.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:53 pm
shandrel erinnightwalker Westboro has been counter-picketed before (they even got rick-rolled >.>) While I am glad that the First Amendment was upheld, I'm not so happy that Westboro gets another reason to puff up. So long as Westboro is on public land when they picket, and do not physically molest someone, they are (unfortunately) allowed to demonstrate like anyone else. I'm a little leery of government regulating morality, even if the subject needs a little "help" to understand what is moral. I do believe that if a funeral is private, then Westboro could be thrown out of the graveyard proper, but not off the sidewalk outside. I would have "accidentally" pointed a 21-gun salute at them, but I'm just a vindictive b***h. I almost, *almost* wish that they would deface a gravestone or something, because then they would be in such a world of legal hurt. Too bad they aren't that stupid (though it is better for the families that they don't). And yes, I do know that hate speech is a terrible, hurtful thing, but the government cannot be allowed to decide what is too far. The second that Westboro does something to turn hate speech into hate crime, they're screwed. Until then, the whole family (and it is mostly a family, most of which are lawyers) will continue to picket and sue people when their picketing gets the desired effect, i.e. a bystander gets pissed and throws a punch. Fight them a different way, with hilarious counter-protests or by forming a human wall between the grieving family and the picket line. Sing a hymn or just show your solidarity. Don't blame the legal system for acting as a decider of law instead of as outraged human beings. They have to be impartial, otherwise what's the point? but the government DOES police hurtful threats" Your going to hell, simply isn't one of them yet. try to say the word " Bomb" in an airport... there are many things we cannot legally say. Do most people get arrested for them? no, but it is still ILLEGAL. That and the fact they are using a "religion" to run a money making scam. Choosing people who are emotionally damaged, and PUSHING them, just to get the grounds for lawsuit. I'm not a lawyer, but i am pretty sure that is illegal too... or i am soo in the wrong line of work... Besides the moral issue, They are preying on the friends and families of fallen soldiers. People who get death benefits, it's a CASH COW, not a moral issue. So you would think the government would do SOMETHING about it... but they won't. (also pointing weapons at them, is a automatic lawsuit and possible criminal charges... ) this catches my eye, and I am even more thoroughly disgusted tha before... I know this much: Words have alot of power. the law only matters if you can enforce it. and money can buy anything. that said, consider the possibilities that the westboro baptists have some kind of influence over the Justices. maybe it's a bribe, or perhaps even intimidation. whatever leverage they weild is kept behind closed doors, so the police don't know about it unless they also can't do anything about it. this is just a theory about one of the ways it could have gone down. point is, regardless of legality, illegal things happen all the time. criminals get away with it. I don't understand how some people can drain others like that... to prey on the suffering mourners for the only compensation they can get for the death of their loved ones... it's the lowest level of greed and spite that I can think of.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Chieftain Twilight Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:29 pm
shandrel I've met plenty of nice, honest Baptists, who truly believed their faith and had not a bone of hate in their body. These people are in this for publicity, lawsuits, and who knows what. You know the funny part about that is it's mostly true. There are a lot of nice honest baptists out there. But their dogma has a ton of hate as I found out by getting on the proverbial "Sh!t List". Don't forget it was a baptist pastor that threatened to shoot me a year, two weeks and five days ago. Their faith doesn't have any hate in it. However, the people do. Remember that it's people make dogma and therefore their dogma is what continues on to shape their faith and beliefs. People have flaws and therefore the Dogma is flawed. The odd part is that people can't choose to be a Christian without choosing a dogmatic formula that suits them. Therefore Christianity in it's "religious" form is flawed. On the other hand, I believe that the Bible is it's own dogmatic formula to believe in. Big difference right? It comes down to this: man made theory and dogma VS what the Bible really says. Westboro on the other hand is no where close to following what the Bible really says. They are despicable because like you said they do this for their own benefit (whatever that could possibly be). Not only do they have worse dogma that generates more hatred than most baptists. They "show their @sses in public" if you will. I'm sure if any of them chose to read the book that they so highly prize they would change their denomination post haste. Cheiftain twilight their right to assemble peacefully would not be taken away if the Supreme Court ruled against them because their protests were violent, not peaceful. They can believe whatever they want, and they can say all the hurtful things they want, but they deserve to be persecuted to the full extent of the law for their crimes against others' freedoms. This is absolutely correct. The military and the families that are picketed should sue for libel and slander. While peacefully assembling and picketing is allowed, slander and libel are punishable offenses and if nothing else Westboro is guilty of them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:11 pm
A really good blog about this issue.Apparently (if I'm reading this right) since the protest wasn't aimed at the specific family and was undertaken on public land according to police direction... they get First Amendment protection same as everyone else.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:23 pm
erinnightwalker A really good blog about this issue.Apparently (if I'm reading this right) since the protest wasn't aimed at the specific family and was undertaken on public land according to police direction... they get First Amendment protection same as everyone else. And when they protest at funerals they usually do it before and after the procession and are on a different lot. They'll be right across the street on some other land, and since they aren't in the cemetary thay figure they aren't doing any harm.
In the Snyder case the lawyer pulled out some nifty tricks. They said that it was an indirect attack of a sort. I forget the whole deal, but they actually did win the case because of the way the lawyer worded it. He said that they were attacking a private person, which is different than attacking a public figure, therefore providing a claim.
The whole case can be found here
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 8:37 am
Daily ShowRelative part to this discussion. Clip in questioni love his little rant, that's about how i feel.... So, who wants church's chicken? razz
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:21 am
"God" Bless Jon Stweart! This is amazing that he has done this on his show! Especially with such foul language towards them! XD Yes! Something may actually happen now that Jon Stewart said something. I'm sure Colbert has something comming up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:02 am
Aakosir "God" Bless Jon Stweart! This is amazing that he has done this on his show! Especially with such foul language towards them! XD Yes! Something may actually happen now that Jon Stewart said something. I'm sure Colbert has something comming up. I think he is waiting for the response to the Daily show lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chieftain Twilight Captain
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:42 am
xd Gods, I love the Daily Show! heart
by the way, just putting this out there, that BYU part, great. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 3:15 pm
What really irks me is the fact that not all sections of the 1st Amendment are being looked in to. Sure, the first Amendment says Freedom of Speech. That is so. But, another thing within freedom of speech is the right to not SLANDER anyone. Meaning? You can't hurt anyone's reputation without proof. Meaning lies. Westboro not only has no proof, but they are slandering every dead soldier within America, and has now slander another man at a funeral. That's just wrong.
Another topic within the 1st Amendment which is Freedom of Assembly. Meaning? Anyone has the right to assemble peacefully. The only thing I hate about that last part is that the government doesn't look into speech as such. They find that actions should only matter. You can hold a KKK rally and talk about hating blacks all you want, but you wont get in trouble unless you start talking about hurting black guys or actually DO start.
However, that doesn't mean us citizens can't take a stand. Half of us are complaining what the meaning of this protest really is. Their points don't stand well. We allow homosexuals in America, so soldiers are killed? Apparently the idea of WAR killing our soldiers don't make sense. But the two ideas just don't click.
We discussed the topic is class briefly today. I noted "I'm surprise no one is standing against them." My old veteran teacher who fought in Nam said " Oh, I'd stand against them. With a bat."
What can we say what is right when laws stand for the wrong?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:21 pm
Governments should fear their people........ This country was founded on the principle of the common man being able to question the actions and hold their government RESPONSIBLE for abuses of power and of the citizens. We simply have been brainwashed to accept everything the government does is infallible.
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Thomas Jefferson
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. Thomas Jefferson
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness. George Washington
Laws made by common consent must not be trampled on by individuals. George Washington
Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government. George Washington
A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats. Benjamin Franklin
Hear reason, or she'll make you feel her. Benjamin Franklin
Constitutions should consist only of general provisions; the reason is that they must necessarily be permanent, and that they cannot calculate for the possible change of things. Alexander Hamilton
Here, sir, the people govern; here they act by their immediate representatives. Alexander Hamilton
In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this: You must first enable the government to control the governed, and in the next place, oblige it to control itself. Alexander Hamilton
Words from the founding fathers.... and what are we doing with their goals? their ideas? we're sheep...afraid to question our own government, lest we be persecuted, and branded "traitor"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:47 am
I am a sucker for great quotes, thanks for posting!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:13 am
WBC is one of THE MOST DISGUSTING examples of humanity in this country. That's how I see it.
The right to assemble is meant for demonstrations to show support or disdain for ideas or practices. It was meant to be an outlet for a group of people to share their strong feelings and allow others to join them without things turning to violence. It wasn't a right that was meant for people to personally attack anyone, and Westboro has made their demonstrations very personal. They have definitely crossed the line.
If they wanted to make a statement, they should be picketing in front of the Pentagon, or around military bases, not at an individual's funeral. What in the hell is a dead man going to do about what they are gathering for anyway? Funerals are for the families of the deceased anyway, and the families aren't the ones who sent their boys and girls off to war, the soldiers made their own decisions.
What do the picketers think they are going to do? Block the soldier's soul from crossing to the pearly gates? .... Oh damn, I guess I can't go anywhere, it's a sin to cross a picket line... I guess I'm damned if I do, damned if I don't...
Yeah, Westboro isn't hurting our soldiers who died, and it's kinda a bit late to change their mind anyway... They aren't making our politicians think any harder about bringing our boys and girls home... They aren't breaking any terrorists' hearts... They are just grievously hurting those people who are putting their family member in the ground, more than they are already hurt by their loss... It's disgusting.
And, i am sorry if the points have already been made, but I will have to read through all of the posts in this topic later. I am spent, and off to bed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|