|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:46 am
Well, attraction can imply more. You just know that person will be imagining things like kissing and t3h sex0rz and they'll touch themselves later at night. xd
Honestly, when I think of the nitty gritty reality of the mechanics of kissing and sex, I'm kind of grossed out...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:45 am
LOL
Never think of the "nitty gritty reality of the mechanics" OF ANYTHING !!!
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
(though I can understand your sentiment)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:20 pm
blaugh Yeah, it's pretty gross stuff when you get down to the mechanics of it. But oddly, the simple thought has never bothered me that much.
For instance, I often hear coworkers comment on the "grossness" of seeing certain people make out (usually old people and fat people xp ). But, although it's not something I'm gonna stare at, it really doesn't bother me to see it. It's like when someone complains about seeing a fat person in a bathing suit or something. They always say something like "People that big shouldn't be allowed to wear that." That makes me think "Why should you be allowed to wear it just because you happen to be 50 lbs. lighter?" If they made laws to protect everyone from seeing anything "gross," no one would be allowed outside ever. xd So I just don't let the human body, or what people might do with it, bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:35 am
Purple: "If they made laws to protect everyone from seeing anything gross"
-----
Sadly they already do that.
It's called "laws that restrict pron" >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:38 am
I can't believe I didn't mention this earlier purple but WTF is up with your sig? xd lmaolawlandsuch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:11 am
I gave her the purple wings ^.^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:20 pm
Dude: That's not about grossness. That's about perceived morality and relative appropriateness. The very people who cry "Protect the children!" love sex. Trust me.
Iakun: Do you like it? whee It was a Thanksgiving avi art. It's supposed to be my avi (at that time) as a turkey! I love it. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:43 am
Seems kinda "double standard" to me.
(very hypocritical)
To like something, but tell others they can't enjoy it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:53 am
It isn't hypocritical to love sex and yet realize such content is not appropriate for minors.
Murder generally is not good but if you have to you will do it to protect a loved one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:37 pm
{
Except these people tell EVERYONE (even those over 18 ) that enjoying such content is wrong just because they themselves are too lazy to get off their own asses and tell the those that ACTUALLY are under 18 that they should wait.
Instead of keeping it from just those that they should be telling what to do (AKA - their F'ing brats), they tell everyone else that they can't enjoy it. Basically turning everyone into babysitters for their own damn children.
Sorry, but I refused to give up MY rights just to do the job that those control freaks should be doing for themselves.
That's why technology has "parental controls" in the first place.
They're just too stupid to realize that that's what they should be using.
I waited 18 damn years for the right to look at porn,
(regardless of the fact that I can't really remember when I started)
so I'm not going to let anyone take it away from me now.
} <---Hidden
Sorry, but this is how I feel about censorship.
And no one is going to change my mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:31 pm
It is a little hypocritical. But the world is full of such double standards.
Duuuuuuude, you started watching cable porn when you got your tv in your room. xd You were 12 or 13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:13 am
Cable porn? WTF cable do you americans have? Christ sake...
I saw my first porn at like... 14 I think. It was straight porn of course, at a straight friend's house. lol I was horrified, excited and intrigued all in one.
I dunno what you're suggesting dude. Are you saying we should have t3h pr0nz just floating around regular tv channels for the sake of viewer freedom?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:36 pm
Purple: I did?
OK, thanks for putting a timeline to it ^^;
Iakun: Oh, yes.
Channels like "HBO" "Cinamax" (I think I spelled it right) and "Showtime"
They have awesome stuff after midnight ^.^
Umm... I don't think I was ever "horrified" about it.
I have always been "excited" and "intrigued"
No, I realize that that wouldn't be good either.
But I would like it to have it's own channel where almost anything could be shown without fear of being banned/sued by every parent on the planet that's too stupid to know how parental controls work. A channel with pr0n 24/7 - maybe two. One for JUST animated and one for JUST LA (live action - for those whose first thought was los angeles)
That is my dream... LOL ^.^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:24 pm
I wouldn't be opposed to that. But if we're making separate channels for types, shouldn't there be one for gay pr0n, one for lesbian pr0n, one for S&M, and one for dude? rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:16 pm
Porn networks could be separated into straight, gay, lesbian, kinks. But seriously, it wouldn't be nearly as good as the stuff you can find online. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
